Jump to content

Wikimedia Foundation elections/2021/Apply to be a Candidate/pt-br

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
This page is a translated version of the page Wikimedia Foundation elections/2021/Apply to be a Candidate and the translation is 97% complete.
Other languages:

A eleição terminou em 31 agosto 2021. Não serão aceitos mais votos.
Os resultados foram anunciados no 7 setembro 2021. Por favor, considere enviar qualquer feedback sobre a eleição de 2021 na página de análise de pós-eleições.

Eleições para o Conselho 2021
Página principal
Candidatos
Informação de votação
Voto Único Transferível
Resultados
Discussões
Perguntas frequentes
Perguntas
Organização
Tradução
Documentação
Esta caixa : ver · discutir · editar

Obrigado aos candidatos que se auto-nomearam como candidatos a curadores do conselho. Os candidatos preencheram o modelo para se apresentarem como candidatos à eleição do Conselho Diretor 2021. Aqui está um exemplo de um formulário de inscrição preenchido.

As inscrições foram aceitas entre 00:00 9 de junho de 2021 (UTC) e 23:59 de 29 de junho de 2021 (UTC). Os candidatos só podem alterar sua inscrição até 3 dias após o envio ou até o encerramento do período de indicação às 23h59 de 29 de junho de 2021 (UTC). Pequenas correções ortográficas ou de tradução são aceitáveis fora desses horários. (Veja a nota sobre as correções de envio.)

Os "recursos dos candidatos" estão disponíveis para apoiar os candidatos durante a eleição de 2021. Fique à vontade para entrar em contato com os facilitadores eleitorais do Conselho Diretor para obter mais informações.

Perguntas da comunidade para candidatos

De 9 a 29 de junho de 2021, membros do movimento Wikimedia enviaram perguntas através desta página a candidatos ao Conselho Diretor. Os membros da comunidade podem fazer suas perguntas em qualquer idioma.

Além de enviar uma pergunta, os membros da comunidade também podem endossar ou comentar as perguntas enviadas por outras pessoas.

Em 30 de junho de 2021, o Comitê Eleitoral agrupará as perguntas da lista e as apresentará para os candidatos responderem a partir de 7 de julho.

Este método está sendo usado para tornar este processo mais acessível e gerenciável para os candidatos, tradutores, Comissão Eleitoral e eleitores. Pedimos que as pessoas respeitem o tempo de todos os envolvidos e não use as páginas de perguntas para fazer links para outras páginas com mais perguntas, ou contatar os candidatos em suas páginas de discussão, ou via e-mail. Agradecemos antecipadamente por seu respeito e cortesia.

Candidatos

Não comece a responder às perguntas antes do Comitê Eleitoral publicar uma lista agrupada em 2 de julho de 2021.

É altamente recomendável que as respostas às perguntas não excedam aproximadamente 1600 caracteres por pergunta (sem contar os espaços). Não crie um link para outra página que contenha uma resposta extensa, embora links relevantes usados para fins descritivos sejam adequados. Devido ao número de eleitores e candidatos, isso é necessário para manter essas páginas legíveis, informativas e, portanto, úteis para os eleitores.

Perguntas enviadas

Obrigado a todos que enviaram perguntas para os candidatos. O período de envio de perguntas está encerrado. A lista de perguntas que o Comitê Eleitoral selecionou para os candidatos responderem pode ser vista na página de Perguntas e Respostas do Candidato.

  1. O que os candidatos pensam sobre o aumento do número de voluntários nos projetos da Fundação Wikimedia e como fazer isso acontecer?
  2. Onde você pessoalmente deseja ver o Conselho Diretor em relação a outras entidades do Wikiverso (comunidades, afiliados, etc.) no futuro (por exemplo: Ensure Equity in Decision-making)?
  3. Como os candidatos se conectarão com a comunidade uma vez no Conselho Diretor?
  4. Explique sua opinião sobre transparência e comunicação.
    1. Endorse. --Yair rand (talk) 23:57, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  5. O que você acha das comunidades emergentes da Wikimedia?
  6. Por que você acha que seria um bom candidato a um assento no Conselho Diretor?
    1. Endorse. --Yair rand (talk) 23:57, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Existe uma conexão entre seus interesses profissionais ou financeiros e o Conselho Diretor? Em caso afirmativo, descreva como você pode garantir que isso não interfira.
  8. Como a Fundação deve tratar os projetos administrados por uma fundação que incorrem em uma grande quantidade de oposição na wiki?
    1. Endorse. I believe this is, by far, the most serious issue the Foundation needs to resolve. Alsee (talk) 20:38, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    2. Endorse in the strongest possible terms. Seraphimblade (talk) 02:44, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    3. Endorse absolutely, "on-Wiki oppositions" and/or "over-all community disagreement"... -- টিটো দত্ত (কথা) 07:53, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    4. Endorse strongly. An important and sensitive issue. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 14:42, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    5. Endorse. --Yair rand (talk) 21:09, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    6. Endorse - Jr8825 (talk) 22:53, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Você acredita que há limites para o escopo da Fundação Wikimedia e, em caso afirmativo, quais são esses limites?
  10. Como você imagina os wikis moldando o futuro da internet e como a Fundação Wikimedia pode apoiar as comunidades wiki para tornar essa visão uma realidade?
  11. Como podemos envolver mais especialistas (pesquisadores, acadêmicos, profissionais) para se juntar ao nosso movimento?
    1. Endorse but might add "while maintaining the ability of non-experts to contribute." Smallbones (talk) 01:34, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    2. Endorse -- Llywrch (talk) 07:00, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Qual é a sua opinião sobre a reivindicação de autonomia das comunidades da Wikipedia e as tentativas da Fundação Wikimedia de regular o controle sobre a comunidade?
    1. Conditional Endorse. This is a good question in itself, but I consider #8 + #41 better. If those others are included then this question may have too much overlap. Alsee (talk) 20:38, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Qual é a sua opinião sobre a mudança da marca da Wikimedia para a Wikipédia, que está borrando a diferença?
    1. Endorse --Andreas JN466 20:21, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    2. Endorse -- টিটো দত্ত (কথা) 15:37, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    3. Endorse Alsee (talk) 20:38, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    4. Endorse -Killarnee (C•T•U) 20:44, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    5. Suggest removing "which is blurring the difference" -- that part makes this a leading question. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 00:51, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    6. Endorse with ProcrastinatingReader's suggested modification. Seraphimblade (talk) 02:44, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    7. Endorse this question in either format. -- Llywrch (talk) 07:00, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    8. Endorse – Ammarpad (talk) 08:27, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    9. Endorse strongly. EpicPupper (talk) 17:29, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Você pensa que a atual estrutura de regras e processos da Wikipédia efetivamente evita o preconceito? Como líder comunitário, o que você pensa que poderia ser feito para melhorar o combate ao preconceito?
  15. O que você acha do crescente questionamento que os projetos da Wikimedia têm globalmente e o que você faria a respeito?
  16. Existem vários movimentos por aí (especialmente aqueles fundados por uma comunidade de especialistas) que têm exatamente a mesma visão que nós (disseminação de conhecimento gratuito na Internet). Mas eles decidiram fazer sua própria plataforma (ou usando outra plataforma) diferente da Wikipédia para alcançar sua visão. Qual sua opinião sobre isso? Devemos tentar "integrá-los" à Wikimedia ou apenas deixá-los ter sua própria independência.
  17. O que você acha sobre como a Fundação Wikimedia deve se envolver de forma mais eficaz com as WikiComunidades do Sul Global em um futuro próximo (próximos 2 a 3 anos)?
    1. Endorse, global south and/or "emerging communities". -- টিটো দত্ত (কথা) 15:41, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    2. Endorse - Jr8825 (talk) 22:53, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Os projetos da Wikimedia deveriam se envolver mais com a Década de Ação da ONU (para Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável, Acordo de Paris, Metas da Convenção sobre Biodiversidade, etc...)? E que papel intermediário pode ou deve a Fundação Wikimedia desempenhar a este respeito?
  19. Quais são seus pensamentos sobre o futuro de WikiSpecies, WikiNotícias, Wikiversidade e outros projetos Wiki menores? E como a Fundação Wikimedia pode apoiá-los?
    1. Endorse, absolutely, yes please. I'll add Wikisource, Wikivoyage also. These projects often do not get the required support, and I find this question very important. -- টিটো দত্ত (কথা) 07:57, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    2. Endorse (but fix the capitalization please). --Yair rand (talk) 21:09, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Você tem metas ou resultados específicos que deseja alcançar durante seu gerenciamento como membro do conselho?
  21. O que diversidade na comunidade Wikimedia significa para você? Como isso pode ser alcançado de forma quantificável? (Exemplo: redução nas lacunas de dados)
  22. Há um crescimento constante das despesas da Fundação Wikimedia ao longo dos anos. Quais os seus pensamentos sobre este assunto? Deve haver limites de 5 anos para os gastos?
    1. Something like this would be good, but I don't think the question should specifically ask about caps. --Yair rand (talk) 23:57, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Quando se trata de alocar os recursos da fundação, como você gostaria de priorizar os fundos entre o pagamento da dívida técnica e o trabalho em novas iniciativas estratégicas?
    1. Endorse this question. Probably the single one I would choose if only one question was asked. MarioGom (talk) 15:59, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    2. Endorse the concept but prefer wording/formulation of #50. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 00:47, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  24. What do you think about the WMF using funds for purposes not related to Wikimedia projects?
    1. Endorse. --Yair rand (talk) 21:09, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    2. Endorse - I should note that this should be interpreted as "clearly and directly", as our inherent nature means everything could be claimed to be vaguely related Nosebagbear (talk) 21:12, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Do you think the WMF should take any active role in relation to undisclosed paid editing?
  26. What do you think about Wikimedia_Enterprise? Do you think its criticsm is justfied?
    1. Endorse -Killarnee (C•T•U) 20:44, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Given recent comments by ex-staffers, should the new Board conduct an investigation about management misconduct at the WMF, including but not limited to bullying, union busting and discrimination based on sex, race or disabilities?
    1. Endorse. Especially given that multiple individuals raised such complaints, this needs to be investigated and resolved. Seraphimblade (talk) 02:59, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    2. Endorse -- Llywrch (talk) 07:00, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    3. (I recommend excluding the "including" part, to keep if brief.) --Yair rand (talk) 21:09, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    4. Endorse - Jr8825 (talk) 22:53, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  28. How should the 4 community board seats due to be selected in 2022 be filled?
  29. Have you, or any members of your immediate family, received any financial benefits from the WMF or a WMF affiliate in the past 5 years?
  30. How did you contribute to the Movement Strategy process, the Movement Brands Project, the UCOC process, the proposed Bylaws amendments, and the call for feeback on community board selections?
  31. Under what (if any) circumstances should the board extend the term of community-selected trustees?
  32. When should Foundation projects require explicit approval by the community and how should that approval be assessed?
    1. Conditional Endorse. This is a good question in itself, but I consider #8 + #41 better. If those others are included then this question may have too much overlap. Alsee (talk) 20:38, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  33. If you had been a Board member in 2019, would you have supported the Board's statement on the ban of Fram from the English Wikipedia? Would you have proposed any changes or additions to this statement?
  34. Allegations of a hostile workplace environment at WMF have been made by former employees here and here. What is your reaction to this and is there anything that you would do as a board member to change this?
  35. Katherine Maher recently floated the idea of paying contributors. Should the Foundation start discussions on what a model of compensation would look like?
    1. Endorse -Killarnee (C•T•U) 20:44, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Given the amount of work stewards do, do you think stewards should be paid? Why (not)? If yes, how much?
  37. Should there be a waiting period between the time a Board member leaves the Board, and they take on an employee, consultant, or other paid role with the Foundation?
    1. Endorse. Chico Venancio (talk) 19:44, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    2. Endorse --Andreas JN466 20:21, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    3. Endorse -Killarnee (C•T•U) 20:44, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    4. Endorse. Seraphimblade (talk) 02:50, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    5. Endorse -- Llywrch (talk) 07:00, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    6. Endorse --RaiderAspect (talk) 12:57, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    7. Endorse -- though I'd prefer How long should be the waiting period... rather than Should there be a waiting period.... AllyD (talk) 06:07, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    8. Endorse -- B25es (talk) 16:57, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    9. Endorse - Jr8825 (talk) 23:06, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  38. To reduce the possibility of conflicts of interest or the appearance of conflict of interest do you commit to not accept any employed or remunerated position with the Foundation for at least the duration of your stay on the board and 6 months until after leaving the board?
    1. Endorse --Andreas JN466 20:21, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    2. Endorse. Seraphimblade (talk) 02:50, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    3. Endorse -- Llywrch (talk) 07:00, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    4. Endorse -- AllyD (talk) 06:07, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    5. Endorse -- B25es (talk) 16:57, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Non-affiliated volunteers (i.e. volunteers who are not members of any Wikimedia affiliate) do most of the work on the wikis, yet elect only a quarter of board seats. Do you think this is right?
  40. How can WMF deal with proposed or established intermediary liability rules in different countries and safeguard the local Wikimedia volunteers from prosecution by government agencies?
  41. The Foundation rejected repeated calls to make the Movement Strategy a consensus process. I believe none of the resulting projects have an established consensus, including the Code of Conduct. Rebranding was 92% opposed,[1] and an item to undermine our core content quality policies appears to have 100% opposition.[2] I believe those running the process clearly advanced their own agenda, disregarding all opposition. Do you consider the Strategy process legitimate? Do staff have a valid mandate to impose these Strategy projects on us? (Please to not get sidetracked on the merits of any particular project, this is a process question.)
  42. Would you be in favor of hiring an outside firm to do an independent audit of board actions over the preceding two years?
  43. As a board member, would you encourage the board to evaluate the wisdom of close relationships with specific outside groups such as the Tides Foundation?
  44. What are your thoughts on how to handle the competing representation issues between giving "seats in the room" for smaller/medium projects at the expense of reducing the "per-editor" vote of large projects, such as may be a question for the Global Council? An example of a proposal along these lines can be seen here, with issues raised on the talk page.
  45. What do you think about the problem that there are arbitration committees in a few wikis, but not in all, and so the parties can transfer their conflict to other wikis in order not to be punished there, or if the conflict was already on the other wiki, there is no independent dispute resolution body at all? What do you think of a single point of contact for all wikis? Otherwise there would often only be a) abandoning the project to avoid the bullying or b) a civil lawsuit.
  46. How important is privacy for you? Are you in favor of anonymous editors not automatically publishing their IP address, or should Wikipedia continue to lag behind in terms of privacy?
  47. Several severe communication issues have been reported with the iOS and Android mobile apps and the web client, all currently in production. Do you agree with the WMF's response to these? More generally, how can the community ensure the difficulties they experience with the software are prioritised in development resource allocations?
    1. Endorse - Nosebagbear (talk) 10:01, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    2. Endorse MarioGom (talk) 16:19, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Do you feel the current spending and available personnel on development issues (both on building new features and fixing bugs in existing ones) is too low, too high, or about right?
    1. Endorse but I would favor wording of #23. MarioGom (talk) 16:19, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Which past Board resolutions or other actions would you vote to overturn, if any?
  50. What percentage of the WMF's annual budget should be allocated among the following categories: (1) maintaining server uptime now and in the foreseeable future, (2) clearing the phabricator backlog, (3) recruiting new participants, and (4) everything else?
    1. Conditional Endorse. Another category should be added: "Improving and modernizing the interfaces for readers and editors" not limited to the current phabricator backlog. DGG (talk) 01:56, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  51. A number of board members, as well as C-level Foundation employees, have been brought onboard who never provide any clue what their opinions or thoughts about Wikimedia's mission is or should be -- neither at the beginning of their tenure nor at any time afterwards. What thoughts do you have about requiring them to provide some statement to the volunteers on this matter? -- Llywrch (talk) 07:00, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Do you believe that communication with individual editors as a Trustee is important? What are you views on how quickly, and in how much detail, Trustees should be expected to reply to individual queries by editors with regards to issues and their role (as an average across the year/term)?
  53. Do you think a community member can be an effective CEO of the WMF? Should the WMF look within the communities, rather than outside, to fill that vacancy?
  54. Do you think that a larger portion of the board seats should be directly elected by the community?
  55. Wikimedia Foundation has no dedicated accessibility team, do you think we should be doing more given both legal (Americans with Disabilities Act etc.) and ethical ramifications? Should web accessibility be a commitment by the Board of Trustees itself, like with, say, BLP policy?
  56. Name three elephants in the room. How do you propose to deal with them?
  57. From the 8 prioritized Movement Strategy initiaves (letterd A to H on Movement Strategy), the top priority is creating a Movement Charter whereby a Global Council will be created, and resposibilities will be transfered from the (Board of Trustees) of the Wikimedia Foundation to the Global Council. Please elaborate on this top priority.
  58. Should the Board wait until after the elections to choose the next CEO?
  59. What skills and qualities would you look for in the next CEO?
  60. Should the WMF fundraise in impoverished countries?
  61. Who is ultimately responsible for the Board of Trustees collective ability to follow its own procedures, policies and code of conduct?

Lista agrupada de perguntas

Em 30 de junho de 2021, o Comitê Eleitoral reunirá as perguntas para os candidatos responderem a partir de 7 de julho.

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikimedia_Foundation_elections/2021/Apply_to_be_a_Candidate/pt-br&oldid=26511833"