User talk:Dawid2009
Add topic
Welcome to Meta!
[edit]Hello Dawid2009, and welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Wikimedia Forum (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). Happy editing!
-- 19:50, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
{{ping|Count Count I made a lot of edits in Wikipedias. Most probable some of them are good and some of them are bad. Why in my case last warning (+adding my account to pagewatch) can not be solving problem instead blocking? I never used bot, if anything just touch typing. I always assume good faith and just will hear everything what you can tell me or ask me. Best regards Dawid2009 (talk) 12:14, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
- BTW, I noted you reverted your edit recently, what do you mean by that? Just tell me, I will listen to you, but let know I am not spam bot, you can ask me anything. Cheers Dawid2009 (talk) 12:16, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
- I already removed the block request form SRG per AGF. Just stop spamming
romecitynow.comcrosswiki into Google-related articles. Count Count (talk) 12:17, 3 September 2023 (UTC)- @Count Count: Ok, thanks for explaining that. BTW, if I would like to inspire many editors (cross-wiki) to create new articles about most often rated places on google maps, then could I do that cross-wiki by pinging users on the talk pages? Is cross-wiki engaging generally right if is right with the rules and manners? There is no article on Wikipedia on most often rated places by google maps but there are about stuff which I believe is less encyclopedi, for example most followed instagram accounts, it is why I started adding that link as source. What I can know many users were doing such things and they wre more or less criticised or not. Cheers. Dawid2009 (talk) 12:23, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
- You can not engage by just adding a weblink. Weblinks are always contentious, in particular if they lead to commercial sites like the one you added. Also usually weblinks should lead to authoritative sites in the same language.
- In general Wikipedians write about whatever they want to (just like you and me) and that is just fine. They do not need to be pushed to write articles about certain subjects. Count Count (talk) 12:32, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Count Count: Ok, thanks for explaining that. BTW, if I would like to inspire many editors (cross-wiki) to create new articles about most often rated places on google maps, then could I do that cross-wiki by pinging users on the talk pages? Is cross-wiki engaging generally right if is right with the rules and manners? There is no article on Wikipedia on most often rated places by google maps but there are about stuff which I believe is less encyclopedi, for example most followed instagram accounts, it is why I started adding that link as source. What I can know many users were doing such things and they wre more or less criticised or not. Cheers. Dawid2009 (talk) 12:23, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
- I already removed the block request form SRG per AGF. Just stop spamming