User talk:2600:387:5:80D:0:0:0:7F

Unblock request declined This blocked user has had their unblock request reviewed by one or more administrators, who has/have reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Request reason: I was unaware of any abuse. One or two bad actors should not result in millions being blocked.--2600:387:5:80D:0:0:0:7F 18:02, 9 December 2023 (UTC) Decline reason: Already dealt with, see User_talk:2600:387:15:2D16:0:0:0:8. --M/ (talk) 18:52, 9 December 2023 (UTC) বাংলা | English | español | français | magyar | italiano | 한국어 | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | українська | 中文 | edit

block log gblock log blocklist stalktoy guc unblock gunblock contribs: +/-

Unblock request declined This blocked user has had their unblock request reviewed by one or more administrators, who has/have reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Request reason: There is too much collateral. Note per w:en:WP:/64, these blocks can affect multiple customers so hard blocking a range like this for a month is too much collateral. Please lift the block.2600:387:5:80D:0:0:0:7F 15:35, 21 January 2024 (UTC) Decline reason: per statement below --Johannnes89 (talk) 21:22, 1 March 2024 (UTC) বাংলা | English | español | français | magyar | italiano | 한국어 | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | українська | 中文 | edit

block log gblock log blocklist stalktoy guc unblock gunblock contribs: +/-

Comment you may wish to consider creating an account so that you don't hit this problem. It seems that there are some bad actors in the range that we are needing to manage.  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:21, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

@Tegel: This and another on the range has also requested an unblock. Seems that there may be some static IPs in the range.  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:21, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

@Tegel: Are you intending to respond to this? --Ferien (talk) 19:23, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for reminding me. My block has expired and I haven't checked what the IP-address has been up to after that so I have no comment on the current block. -- Tegel _(Talk) 15:59, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

It seems like all of those unblock requests were coming from the same person (not the first time they were complaining about a range block citing en:WP:64) – likely the same LTA targeted by this range block. Yes this range block affects many IP addresses, but in practice the number of individual users affected (except the LTA) seems to be low. Given that this seems to be a dynamically assigned IP (so they are likely using another IP now), there is no reason to unblock this IP, even if my previous statements were wrong. -> declined. --Johannnes89 (talk) 21:22, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

---