Talk:Requests for comment/Swedish Fork
Add topicLatest comment: 4 years ago by Adville
I copy below comments from other then Dan, which he repeately deletes.Yger (talk) 16:24, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Comment by Anhn
[edit]I just here confirm that I as an admin on svwp have blocked Dan Koehl 2 weeks for bad etiquette the 15:th of August 2020. The justification can be found here (in swedish) but can shortly be described as not following the 4:th of Wikipedias Five Pillars, namely that "Wikipedia's editors should treat each other with respect and civility". The blocking has been thoroughly discussed at WP:KAW, comments about the administration of svwp, and the only disagreement is that several users asked for a longer blocking. / Anhn (talk) 21:54, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- Anhn did a good job trying to make this soup in cronological order to make it easier to read. Unfortunately DK does not want that and reverts it to ’’hos’’ non-cronology. I Will not revert it any more, cos this only shows his way of editing. However, Dan, do not tell me what to do or not to do here. I tried to answer, but you refuses to read what I write and just rewrites it in your pov. Therefor I anseende you that it is no use to answer anything you Ask me to answer... but I Will answer other users asking questions. However, Noone seems to care about this because it is to hard to follow here above. Thats why I tried to help Anhn to keep it more easy to read. Adville (talk) 14:16, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- I have correct and politely given you answers on my talk page regarding this. Everyone else can read, and I belive so can you. Please feel free to add comments, and especially answers to my questions, in the document, without manipulating the structure of the document. Dan Koehl (talk) 16:31, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- I also hereby, once again, claim that my present block, like the previous, is against the five pillars and rules for any other Wikipedia. A lynching can never 2020 be regarded as "justification", where NONE ever discussed, or analyzed, the behaviour of the user, who asked me to get blocked. Dan Koehl (talk) 16:31, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- I have put the comments back. Adville (talk) 17:56, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- I also hereby, once again, claim that my present block, like the previous, is against the five pillars and rules for any other Wikipedia. A lynching can never 2020 be regarded as "justification", where NONE ever discussed, or analyzed, the behaviour of the user, who asked me to get blocked. Dan Koehl (talk) 16:31, 22 August 2020 (UTC)