Jump to content

Talk:Requests for comment/Extreme abuses at the Romanian Wikipedia

Add topic
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Pafsanias in topic Apologizes

De-collapsing content

[edit]

@Ark25: I wonder whether you can expand and de-collapse the content, so everyone can see it clearly. --George Ho (talk) 11:33, 8 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

@George Ho: - I did it, it was collapsed because I thought that it will make the page too long and it will bother the readers. —  Ark25  (talk) 16:29, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
Well... I see your point about making readability easier. Still, I'm not generally thrilled with collapsing things unless I find something inappropriate. Also, it doesn't make editing easier, especially when headers are hatted/collapsed. --George Ho (talk) 17:22, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Rename the title?

[edit]

Ark25, maybe we should rename the title to "2016 2017 issues on Romanian Wikipedia". It looks too narrow, so I want to brainstorm or widen the scope and figure out the issues with Romanian Wikipedia. Almost similar to "Requests for comment/2013 issues on Croatian Wikipedia". How's that? --George Ho (talk) 19:38, 11 July 2017 (UTC); corrected, 19:40, 11 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Well, to be honest, in my view, "Extreme abuses at the Romanian Wikipedia", is the right title since it accurately reflects the situation there. The admins at Romanian Wikipedia want the name changed, most likely because they are embarrassed about the fact that now everyone can see how far they got. For them, changing the name would be very important for the PR. But your call, of course. —  Ark25  (talk) 19:47, 12 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
Umm... what is PR, Ark25? May you please elaborate? Thanks. Also, I think my suggested title is better because it's more inviting and more neutral than the current one, regardless of accuracy. --George Ho (talk) 22:15, 12 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
@George Ho: By PR I mean Public Relations. The admins at the Romanian Wikipedia are probably worried that this title makes them look bad. But yes, you are right. Indeed, it's more inviting and more neutral. —  Ark25  (talk) 00:51, 17 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for pinging me, Ark25, and agreeing with me about the titling. May I rename the case now please? --George Ho (talk) 00:53, 17 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
Sure, please do so. —  Ark25  (talk) 00:57, 17 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Never mind. The name was reverted back to original title. --George Ho (talk) 19:22, 24 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your further statements

[edit]

Hey, Tgeorgescu. May you please move your comments from one section to a newer section please, like "More statements from Tgeorgescu"? They don't seem to relate to the stats from ro.wp, do they? --George Ho (talk) 19:22, 24 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Apologizes

[edit]

I want to say that I was completely wrong. I did a lot of wrong things at the Romanian Wikipedia. I've greatly abused the time and the patience of the community there. I am sorry and I apologize for that. They made some errors in the way they blocked me but their decision was correct: they were right to block me because I was an extreme nuisance. —  Ark25  (talk) 20:33, 23 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

And that is why you tried to evade the ban by using a new reincarnation of your old account? --Pafsanias (talk) 00:45, 15 April 2020 (UTC)Reply