Jump to content

Talk:Proposals for closing projects/Closure of Nahuatl Wikipedia 2

Add topic
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Dear community, If you need about more information you contact with me. Thank you very much; if need to contact with Native Speakers in this languages you can to write User:Tepoxteco and User:Teòtlalili. --Marrovi (talk) 19:10, 15 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

A little respect

[edit]

Dear Sysops and Stewards, with all due respect:

How is it that you allows a user to modify the editions of other users, creating a manipulated and distorted version?

How do you allow a user to make text-wall with long strings of signed comments that only come to confuse the participants?

Dear Sysops and Stewards, I humbly ask you to reverse the editions of user Marrovi (10/13/2017 between 01:15 and 03:49 UTC) that alters and vandalizes my comment. Please make him respect my opinion by not changing my comment. I do not want to go into edit warring for that. --Akapochtli (talk) 23:10, 13 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Please @Liuxinyu970226: notify it. --Akapochtli (talk) 00:27, 14 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

(Notes: Requests for comment/Global ban for user Marrovi, Talk:Requests for comment/Global ban for user Marrovi, en:Talk:Teotlalpan)--Marrovi (talk) 19:30, 15 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Rename the URL to https://nci.wikipedia.org ?

[edit]

In the Oppose section I saw the first comment which proposals to rename this Wikipedia to be nci:, I don't know if this would be suitable for better splitting than closing. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:32, 16 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Liuxinyu970226: I guess the problem here, as it were, is that the current code of the project (nah) is a collective code. That makes it not kosher by current rules. So if the project is really Classical Nahuatl (or mostly that), then nci is its proper code. Once this PCP is resolved one way or the other, then we can worry about what its url should be. And at that, you know well that changing the url of an existing project is a very difficult thing to do. So I'd leave this alone for now. StevenJ81 (talk) 13:57, 16 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
Good idea, to change nah by nci, ISO code nah is for many nahua languages; lifes or deaths. Nahuatl languages there are diferent ISO codes as soon as nhn, nch, ngu, and others. nci: is about Classical Nahuatl an academic language, a death language without Native nahua speakers. Other nahuatl language ISO code is very dangerous, for life Nahuatl languages is very necessary Native speakers. Regards. --Marrovi (talk) 00:28, 18 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
nah code is a soup opera, bad articles mixed with many Nahuatl languages, invented words with fictional concepts; I learned Classical Nahuatl, now I'm learning Modern Nahuatl languages. A bad project in Huiquipedia now, but to change an ISO code can be to help us because an new articles will be only Classical Nahuatl, similar to Sanscrit wikipedia, Latin wikiepdia, Classical Chinese wikipedia and Classical Greek wikipedia.--Marrovi (talk) 00:37, 18 October 2017 (UTC)Reply