Talk:Licensing update/License comparison

Translations possible?

Is this ready for translation or is it not planned for translation? --Nux (talk) 07:00, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

I'm fairly sure that the comparison is completed. May as well begin translating; thanks for any help. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 07:05, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Then again. I'll try and check with Cbrown. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 07:07, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

• I've received confirmation that would suggest that the page is not finalised. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 12:48, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Is this page ready for translations or not?--Seha 20:18, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

It's ready to go :-) --Eloquence 20:34, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Danke Erik :-) --Seha 20:38, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Open file formats query

See Talk:Licensing update#Open file formats query - courtesy link to a question about this page's table. FT2 ^{(Talk | email)} 23:14, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

101這名怎麼來的，先說我只是想讓人知道，這臺灣響魊國際的地上建築物，真正的功能應該怎麼啟動，讓當初與會人員知道，我舉個例 兵器乃兇器一樣都是傷人的，差別在那？使用者嗎？，一者存私心用一者公器不帶個人情緒波動，地表上聳立者誰也不能私藏，相信很多人都去試過，這傳賢不傳子，有本事就是你的，"江山待有人才出" 國之重器，翻成白 話，黯夜版 大陸也一套，這是同一個時間點交辦出去的，上海市那"霸企大樓"也就國際商戰時分左右手各持一把，一主攻一主守，平時就擺者，可它的權限很恐怖！部會首長以下，可先打了再找理由，包含部長，這五院院長有決策過，并認可之人，所以當確定一人後，就開始找下一個十年，"十年一大運 誰主浮沉" 今天中華民國107,03,14發表，我會讓它發展到一個極致，有機會的話，先交辦兩件事，{立院得在下個會期，將委員，議員以及國家發包工程暫定公務人員一律納入財物申報法裡， 再來臺灣海域將對外開放，歡迎國際經商旅遊背包客或航海家到臺灣運補，將採落地簽證。前提是有委員擬草...我就是要知道能不能用！ 工欲善其事，必先利其器

A85608955 (talk) 13:11, 14 March 2018 (UTC)