Talk:Language committee/2025

Joining to the committee

Hi, I am interested in joining to the committee. Nemoralis (talk) 19:36, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

I've sent you an email. --MF-W 18:06, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Central Kanuri Wikipedia

Tracked in Phabricator:
Task T385181

The Language Committee intends to approve Requests for new languages/Wikipedia Central Kanuri. If you have any objections to that based on the Language Proposal Policy, please tell us here on this page in the next 7 days. Meanwhile, the community is asked to check (and if necessary, complete) the wiki settings as indicated on the request page. --Sotiale (talk) 14:24, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

@Sotiale I checked the request page there is no any indicated wiki settings that's need to be completed. MohammedBama123 (talk) 12:27, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

@MohammedBama123: I tried to create a ticket for the developers about this today, but I still found some empty space in the settings; Project namespace(Project:) and Project talk namespace(Project talk:). Is it correct that the timezone for West Africa is Africa/Lagos(GMT+1)? And will you request the logo separately after you create the wiki? --Sotiale (talk) 11:47, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

@Sotiale I have updated the wiki settings, as for the time zone is Africa/Lagos(GMT+1) and for the Logo we will use Wikipedia logo for the project. MohammedBama123 (talk) 13:03, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

@MohammedBama123: Could you please check if the namespace is correct? For example, the current settings: in the English Wikipedia, there is Wikipedia:Five pillars; in your project, 'Central Kanuri Wikipedia:Five pillars'. In the enwiki, Wikipedia talk:Five pillars; in your project, 'Mana kǝla Wikipedia yǝn:Five pillars'. (Project name is Wikipédia; Mana kǝla Wikipédia yǝn?) --Sotiale (talk) 13:18, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

@Sotiale I have updated the project name is correct. MohammedBama123 (talk) 13:35, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

@MohammedBama123: Could you please also check the project namespace? It is rare to put language names in namespaces. This needs to be done very carefully as once set it is very difficult to change later. --Sotiale (talk) 13:48, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

@Sotiale It's Done MohammedBama123 (talk) 14:12, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

@MohammedBama123: Sorry to keep asking questions, but could you please... fix the timezone you mentioned above? And empty the logo file. I can't do this for you(this must be done by members of the community), and if it's unclear, it will delay the creation by receiving additional questions from developers. To prevent that, please double check the other boxes so I don't have to ask you any additional questions. --Sotiale (talk) 14:28, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

@Sotiale I have updated the time zone and empty the file logo. MohammedBama123 (talk) 14:41, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

it will delay the creation by receiving additional questions from developers - for the record this is generally no longer true - new wikis get created with placeholder config and then the requested settings are applied in a later step, so only that step can be delayed. If no further changes to the settings are made what will happen is that no logo will get set (which I think means it will default to the English Wikipedia's logo), and the namespaces will be applied as they are. You can set it later through the Wikimedia site requests process. * Pppery * _{it has begun} 16:54, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

I forgot it was now after the expedited process for creating wikis was introduced. Thanks. --Sotiale (talk) 04:12, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ (talk) 13:14, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Livonian Wikipedia

Dear language committee, Livonian has been in the incubator for almost 14 years now. Since that time the amount of speakers of the language and the amount of people involved with the language has significantly grown. There are even new native speakers as of now. There is thus an active online community who would like Livonian to be an official language on Wikipedia and I think Livonian Wikipedia is now ready for it.

I would hereby like to request for the Livonian Wikipedia to be created if possible. Kamrat ett (talk) 18:44, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi, Wp/liv hasn't had a consistent contributor for almost 2 years according to the active user statistics. If there are many speakers, please encourage them to join the project and become contributing users. Since you made 25 edits in January and there were no other active users, and you didn't contribute anything in December, it doesn't satisfy the sustainability of the community, so it can't be approved at the moment. However, I think if you continue to contribute enough with other users, this will be resolved and approved. Thank you for your contributions! --Sotiale (talk) 07:46, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: (talk) 10:39, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Santali Wiktionary

Tracked in Phabricator:
Task T386619 resolved

The Language Committee intends to approve Requests for new languages/Wiktionary Santali. If you have any objections to that based on the Language Proposal Policy, please tell us here on this page in the next 7 days. Meanwhile, the community is asked to check (and if necessary, complete) the wiki settings as indicated on the request page. --Sotiale (talk) 09:50, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

@ᱤᱧ ᱢᱟᱛᱟᱞ: Hi. I recommend that you review all of the settings on this page over the next 7 days. Project name, Project namespace, Project talk namespace, etc.. Project logo is recommended, but if you don't, it will become the default logo. If you need to change this later, you have to do it yourself, and langcom won't be involved. --Sotiale (talk) 09:50, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Okay, thank you ᱤᱧ ᱢᱟᱛᱟᱞ (talk) 10:35, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Approved. See phab:T386619. --Sotiale (talk) 11:15, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Great news, Thank you. ᱤᱧ ᱢᱟᱛᱟᱞ (talk) 13:20, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

wikt:sat: launched so

This section was archived on a request by: Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:52, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

Santali Wiktionary approval request

Greetings! Dear language committee, Wikimedians of Santali Language User Group and it's Wiki club dedicatedly and actively working for Santali Wiktionary. It is being continuously 5 month our community member are contributing for growth of this project. Every month there is a double digit user are active and we create very good quality of content. We can say currently Santali Wiktionary is the among most active incubator project.

• test page
• Wiki Activity

So I request the language committee for approval of this project.ᱥᱟᱹᱜᱩᱱ ᱗ (talk) 15:50, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

I have just started discussions for approval. Good luck. --Sotiale (talk) 12:20, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Thank You for the appropriate action.

Community members will be happy to know this.☺️ ᱥᱟᱹᱜᱩᱱ ᱗ (talk) 16:50, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Thank you Sotiale. ᱤᱧ ᱢᱟᱛᱟᱞ (talk) 16:00, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

@ᱤᱧ ᱢᱟᱛᱟᱞ: Hi. According to these statistics, there is a need for translation of MediaWiki messages(Most important messages: 93.68 %) in your language. Could your community help translate this? --Sotiale (talk) 07:43, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

Ok ᱤᱧ ᱢᱟᱛᱟᱞ (talk) 08:19, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

Done ᱤᱧ ᱢᱟᱛᱟᱞ (talk) 08:42, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

See above. --Sotiale (talk) 10:05, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: (talk) 14:53, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

Proposal for Restructuring Wikinews Incubation

Dear Langcom,

I find the current approach of incubating Wikinews projects in the Incubator problematic, as these projects are primarily written and read by the contributors themselves. The extensive Incubator URLs are not shareable, and the short links are unreliable and lack trustworthiness for wider audiences. Additionally, while a Langcom member questioned why Wn/shn focuses on templates, I believe these templates offer long-term utility compared to news articles written in the Incubator, which often become stale before the project even has a chance to graduate.

One reason larger-language Wikinews projects struggle is due to competition with numerous free and monetized news outlets and portals. Smaller and medium-sized language communities, however, lack such resources and could benefit from this proposal if a Wikimedia-hosted multilingual platform available to share their news.

I propose moving Wikinews incubation to a multilingual platform at wikinews.org, similar to Multilingual Wikisource. This would provide a reasonable and shareable URL structure, addressing many of the current challenges while empowering smaller communities to publish news effectively. -- ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ (talk) 07:48, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Request for Bengali Wikinews

The Bengali Wikinews project is now ready to come out of incubator. Over the past five months, it has maintained consistent activity with regular contributions and the support of a dedicated, sustainable community. If there are any concerns, please let us know. Otherwise, we kindly request the final approval from the language committee. Thank you!--Sajid Reza Karim 19:34, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

I'm very surprised at the primary contributors there, but I think that if other users' activity dropped in December and then increased again in January, if the same level of contributions continues in February, the approval process could start smoothly. Thank you for your contribution. --Sotiale (talk) 14:40, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Madurese Wikisource

Dear Language Committee, the Madurese Wikisource project has been active for 7 months. We would like to request to review the project for final approval. Thanks -- Johnstad ^{Wanna Talk?} 09:35, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Phabricator task about adding monolingual language code apc-latn

Hi, I had created this task about adding monolingual language code apc-latn, but I see no activity on it. Who could I notify for that? Thanks in advance. TheJoyfulTentmaker (talk) 02:51, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Seems like it's being done now. --MF-W 19:45, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

Tagalog Wikisource

The Language Committee intends to approve Requests for new languages/Wikisource Tagalog. If you have any objections to that based on the Language Proposal Policy, please tell us here on this page in the next 7 days. Meanwhile, the community is asked to check (and if necessary, complete) the wiki settings as indicated on the request page. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 12:23, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

I wish you will approve Wikisource Tagalog soon. Jumark27 (talk) 09:03, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

@Satdeep Gill Dear Language Committee, we wish to get updates on the approval of Tagalog Wikisource. --Filipinayzd (talk) 08:45, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

Tracked in Phabricator:
Task T388639

This section was archived on a request by: MF-W 10:45, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

Tagalog Wikisource

Dear Language Committee, the Tagalog Wikisource project has been active for 8 months. We would like to request to review the project for its final approval. The local edition was proposed in 2010 and there has been a revitalization efforts to build it become the newest Wikimedia project in the language spoken by 29 million native speakers (2010), 54 million second language speakers (2020) or over 83 million Filipinos. Thanks. --Filipinayzd (talk) 13:20, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: MF-W 10:51, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

Interslavic Wikipedia

Hello, dear Language Committee. The Interslavic Wikipedia has been active for the last 5 months, and the community would like the project to be approved. If I'm wrong and it's too early, please write why. Thank you! Medžuslovjanin (talk) 11:06, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Support. TutČas (talk) 11:35, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Support. SkullyWasHere (talk) 15:51, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Nupe Wikipedia Approval Request

Nupe Wikipedia have been up and doing to ensure open knowledge is achieved in the Nupe language. Attached herewith are links showcasing the need for your attention and concerns below to get the language approved:

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Nupe

https://codelookup.toolforge.org/nup

https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:PrefixIndex/Wp/nup/

With this we hope to see our language make a chance to own it's site for wider and easier usage by our existing and new editors. 787IYO (talk) 19:33, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

I'll review this as soon as I have time. Thanks for posting. --Sotiale (talk) 07:47, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Glad for the Nupe language. The community editors should be more dedicated more and more Nupemiyo (talk) 19:05, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

I have just started discussions for approval. Good luck. --Sotiale (talk) 12:20, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

We are happy for the language community efforts towards ensuring languages are preserved. We awaits to see our site gets approved Haweey7575 (talk) 09:21, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for the appropriate commitments. Our community members will be happy to hear that their efforts is noticed by langcom

787IYO (talk) 11:04, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

I would like to note here that this project is currently going through the verification process for approval. --Sotiale (talk) 10:04, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

We are glad to hear this important information. Thanks for the time and supports.14:03, 10 February 2025 (UTC) Haweey7575 (talk) 14:03, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:09, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

Lenape Wikipedia

I have made a serious proposal to the Lenni Lenape groups at Facebook to join forces and request a Wikipedia project in the [en:Lenape] language; please see my [proposal on the web] and let me know if I have misunderstood some part of the process. Since I'm not a speaker of the Lenape language myself, I'm dependant on Lenape spekers to embrace this idea and make it their project, thus I will not issue a formal request for the project to be created unless they themselves agree it would be a good idea and come here to voice their support, hence the detailed webpage, A similar question relates to the name of the project, have I understood it correctly that Lenape speakers are free to suggest an appropriate name and orthography for "Wikipedia" in their language, such as "Sixi Nitaato" which I derived from a 17th-century vocabulary of the language compiled by Swedish clergyman [en:John Campanius] as part of his translation of Luther's Little Catechism into the Lenape language, given the words "nitaato" or "nitáto" (orthography appears to vary) meaning approximately "knowledge" or "skill" ("knowing how to do something well") and "sixi" meaning "quick", "fast"; hence "fast knowledge". I will of course defer to Lenape speakers to say whether this is indeed a proper way of forming a name or compound word in Lenape. I may have made an error suggesting that the name of "Wikidata" can likewise be translated, please let me know if this is not so and I will remove it from the proposal.

With respect to my contribution, what would my role be in this, given that I don't speak the language, well, I'm a keen Wikidata editor, eager to see more languages supported in its lexicographic project. I happen to have a personal relation to the Lenape ever since I took a [en:mitochondrial DNA] test back in 2013, and was genuinely surprised to see a few close American matches in my K1a2c haplogroup who both listed their matrilineal ancestors as Native American, knowing that cross-Bering Native American haplogroups typically begin with letters A-D or X, K had to be post-Columbian, but as both matches traced their ancestries at least back to the 1700's, they could not be explained by the late 19-century wave of migration from Scandinavia, so another explanation must be found, and when I saw that one of them had traced her ancestors back to Virginia in the early 1700's, the [en:New Sweden] colony in present-day [en:Delaware] immediately came to my mind. Therefore I believe I probably have distant cousins among the Lenape, sharing my Forest Finn ancestry from Savo, Finland, with them. This is what sparked my interest in their culture and language, to the point that I will contribute whatever little I can to the creation of a Lenape Wikipedia.--SM5POR (talk) 18:13, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi, you can check out Wp/del, which includes member languages. The Unami Wikipedia is available at the incubator Wp/unm, and you can start the Munsee Wikipedia at Wp/umu. For proposals regarding new Wikimedia language projects, the correct place is Proposals for new projects. -- ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ (talk) 08:43, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

@ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣThank you, the links you provided are quite useful to me and I must now go back and revise my public proposal. The reason I posted here is precisely that it doesn't constitute a formal request for a new project, but rather an inquiry as to whether I had understood the procedure correctly. For that matter could you please confirm that I'm on the right track with respect to translation of the name "Wikipedia" itself, please also comment on my suspicion that this does not apply to "Wikidata".--SM5POR (talk) 10:16, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Check your links; it should be Wp/unm and Wp/umu.--Prosfilaes (talk) 19:08, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Comment. Unami (unm) is a dead language, so Wikipedia in this language will not be created according to the policy, the request will be rejected. Wikipedia in Munsi (umu) can be requested. --Danvintius Bookix (talk) 10:28, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

I don't think that's clear. Extinct languages have been rejected, but languages like Unami, which are recently dead and where there's active language revitalization projects (e.g. The Lenape Language Preservation Project), there is a good chance it will be accepted for creation.--Prosfilaes (talk) 19:08, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

So, how about renaming unm test project to umu, to avoid policy limits on extinct languages? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:24, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

There are different languages, what a renaming? And if someone can convince the committee that the Unami language is alive, then good, but I wouldn't advise it. --Danvintius Bookix (talk) 20:36, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello @SM5POR! Thanks for reaching out.

While it is commendable that you want to introduce speakers to the possibility of creating Wikipedia / adding data in Wikidata in their own language, I think you need to be very clear on your page about who you are and what your input in this would be. On your page you say "We invite the […] community" and "together, we can build" and "we would love to hear your feedback". It is not clear who this "we" is, however. I think it would be best if you made clear this is your personal invitation/proposal/idea that such a project would be beneficial.

Also, creating a new Wikipedia is a long-term effort that can take a lot of time, not least because of the fact that for the approval of a new Wikipedia, the (basics of the) MediaWiki interface need to be translated and at least several users need to sustain activity on the Wikimedia Incubator project for at least several months. As far as I am aware, making it possible to enter data into Wikidata in a new language is far easier than starting a Wikipedia. Maybe that is something that you could take into account in your "advertisement page".

Other users have already mentioned the fact that ISO 639-3 considers the "Delaware languages, also known as the Lenape languages" to consist of two different language, Munsee and Unami, with a very low number of native speakers. For a Wikipedia project, it would be good to clarify who the speakers of the language who can contribute are, and which language they will use precisely. It is also possible that the best course of action would be to have both languages in one wiki. But again, this is something that should be discussed with speakers of the language(s).

About the translation of "Wikipedia" and "Wikidata", this is not something I would mention in the beginning. It is an unnecessary distraction. If a separate Wikipedia for the language is going to be approved, the community will be asked how they want to translate "Wikipedia", but that is not something that needs to be done at the beginning; the answer will probably develop over time with the contributions of native speakers. I don't know whether it is common practice to translate Wikidata's name, but that is something for Wikidata users to know.

-- MF-W 11:33, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

@MF-WarburgI appreciate your concerns, which I share with you, fact is I have deferred many of those issues by letting ChatGPT formulate the proposal, I would appreciate your comments on my revised text which may not yet have reached my web server... Part of my problem is that I have not yet established an ongoing discussion with the Lenape community. It may be that they are cautious about my true intentions, given that I'm Swedish and therefore a representative of the former colonists of their land, add to that my claim to share ancestors with them.--SM5POR (talk) 14:13, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

It doesn't seem to me that the text on your page has changed yet. However, given the fact that you haven't had any contact with "the Lenape community" yet, I suggest you don't do this at all. I mean, what are you trying to achieve? Yes, you can approach them and say "it might be possible to have a Wikipedia in your language, did you know that?" but you'd also have to say "but I can't really help you and it will be very hard". --MF-W 09:58, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Simplified English Wikipedia

I would like to propose a Wikipedia hosting simplified versions of English Wikipedia articles, to coexist with the Simple English Wikipedia, which hosts summaries of English Wikipedia articles. I believe that by closely mirroring English Wikipedia, the most comprehensive Wikipedia currently in existence, a Simplified English Wikipedia could provide both far superior coverage (look at some of the text only prose size differences between en and simple wiki) and better language learning utility by allowing readers who find simple English trivial but en.wiki too difficult to read two article versions in parallel, referring to the simplified English version for "translations" of sentences they find too difficult. Furthermore, I believe it would be easier to create and maintain articles for an SdEWP, as copying text and changes with only some standardized grammatical modifications can be done much more quickly and easily than creating and adapting summaries out of thin air. Is this something that would survive as an actual proposal? Kaotao (talk) 17:10, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

Why wouldn't the Simple English Wikipedia be enough for this purpose? They don't "host summaries of English Wikipedia articles" - they have their own articles which are already written in simple English. EPIC (talk) 17:18, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

My idea for a Simplified English Wikipedia involved mirroring regular English Wikipedia articles as closely as possible; meaning every single sentence on a Simplified English Wikipedia would have a counterpart sentence/sentence fragment on English Wikipedia, in roughly the same place. This would facilitate coverage and quality equal to that of ENWP for a fraction of the maintenance difficulty of SEWP. I had assumed that SEWP articles were summaries, because even major articles there are often citationless. SEWP does have its own articles, which are almost always far less comprehensive than their ENWP counterparts, completely inconsistent with simple English standards (we try to accommodate for intermediate readers in a wiki that's 90% for beginners, and we end up accommodating for neither; with the expectation of parallel reading, an SdEWP could be made in uniformly simple English at a beginner level), and often overtly dumbed down or patronizing. SEWP is over a decade old now, so made-for-SEWP articles are effectively a baked in standard, which I doubt the resident editors would take too kindly to overhauling. Hence the need for a new wiki. Kaotao (talk) 17:40, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

"Is this something that would survive as an actual proposal?" I don't think so, if only for the fact that we wouldn't want to have multiple Simple-ish English Wikipedias. The idea might be better implemented as some kind of external tool that takes Wikipedia content and "simplifies" it according to "some standardized grammatical modifications". --MF-W 09:49, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Hiligaynon Wikisource

Dear Language Committee, the Hiligaynon Wikisource project has been active for 8 months. We would like to request to review the project for its final approval. The activity started in July 2024 and if approved, this would be the first Wikimedia project in the 4th most spoken native language in the Philippines. Thanks. --Filipinayzd (talk) 14:03, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

Beta Wikiversity: Challenges we face incubating on a dead platform

Dear Langcom, since last year, I have been trying to add our main page to the main template to connect with the Main Page. Unfortunately, it is still not displaying. My first request was made last year, and three months later, User:Liuxinyu970226 had to ping all administrators and bureaucrats. The request was addressed, but it still didn’t display. After checking, I realized a few more lines were needed, but no one responded afterward. I also request that admins, sysops, and others be selected and nominated from the currently incubating communities (even for shorter terms such as 3 months, 6 months, or 12 months) who can support each other. This platform should not be used solely for hat collection purposes. --(talk) 11:29, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Langcom is not responsible for administrating the wikis where projects are incubated, but if local administrators don't respond (and indeed only two have been active this year, you can ask global sysops or stewards for help, or run as an administrator yourself. --MF-W 10:50, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your suggestion and guidance. Just for the record, I have taken the following steps in hopes that this will eventually help the platform function better. I have earlier re-listed the request, started a discussion Custodians and general maintenance, later, applied for Custodianship, and reported an issue on Meta. -- (talk) 22:36, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

Finally done by myself. --(talk) 13:53, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: (talk) 13:53, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

Campidanese Sardinian elligibility

Dear LangCom, I'd like to propose a reevaluation of Campidanese Sardinian, specifically Wp/sro, elligibility status, basing myself on the third requisite for elligibility, under the Language proposal policy: «The language must be sufficiently unique that it could not coexist on a more general wiki. In most cases, this excludes regional dialects and different written forms of the same language.». In this case, I argue that, since a Sardinian Wikipedia exists, and Sardinian is considered (at least taking into account SIL's ISO 639-3) a macrolanguage, a more general wiki already exists and is capable of accomodating Campidanese (check this for instance). — Garcez (talk) 14:16, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Pinging some people that might be interested: @Liuxinyu970226, @L2212, @Ooswesthoesbes — Garcez (talk) 14:19, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

I'm not a member of the Langcom, so I have no influence over this. Instead, I'll ping User:MF-Warburg, a more active member who can put it forth on the mailing list. --OosWesThoesBes (talk) 14:23, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for the ping, I also support the reevaluation for the reasons that were also explained on previous discussions on the matter (here: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6). In short yes, Campidanese, Nugorese and Logudorese are just different orthographies of the same language, often used alongside others like LSC for one or more of the many dialects of Sardinian. The Sardinian Wikipedia already has rules and templates to use all of these orthographies, and the people that use the Campidanese one write there. The Campidanese incubator is populated by a single editor that does not even speak the language, and is creating hundreds of copy-pasted articles (with empty sections, few informations and many, many orthographic errors) to transform Sardinian into a "constellation of wikis". Before the arrival of that user, the incubator had exactly 0 articles for years. There is no need to have separate wikis for different orthographies, and that would instead just damage the sc.wiki project. L2212 (talk) 19:58, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Agree with L2212, the eligibility of Campidanese, a dialect of Sardinian should be consider to revoked, as well as Votic. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:37, 10 March 2025 (UTC)