Talk:Global AbuseFilter/Archives/2019

Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in 2019, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion or the archives index.

About Global AbuseFilter 163

Latest comment: 5 years ago8 comments2 people in discussion

On simple Wikipedia, I triggered the abuse filter when trying to reverting another user's edit on w:simple:Temperature,Filter description: ** vandalism. Then every time I submit my edit I would encouter the warning and my autopromote is blocked. Pages include w:simple:Hangzhou, w:simple:Wikipedia:Simple talk and even my talkpage. I turned to the local sysop but she/he tell me that most of my edits hit global filter 163 so I come here. Can anyone help me check Global AF 163 log? I do not think I am doing something wrong. Thank you.--94rain ^Talk 02:13, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

@94rain: shortly after you hit GAF 163, adjustments to it were made and you appear to have stopped hitting it. Can you try again now? — xaosflux ^Talk 02:43, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

@94rain: additionally - that 'phrase' you redacted above - don't mention it in the edit or edit summary. — xaosflux ^Talk 02:43, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

@Xaosflux:OK,I have tried on w:simple:Hangzhou, almost the same edit as the previous one.I successfully submitted my edit. So is the problem solved? Thank you. --94rain ^Talk 02:56, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

@94rain: appears so, let us know if you run in to it again. If you keep editing at simplewiki you should become autoconfirmed there in about 9 days. — xaosflux ^Talk 03:02, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

@Xaosflux: Oh,that is a little long, but thanks anyway.--94rain ^Talk 03:06, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

If you are being held up, you could ask a simplewiki bureaucrat to manually confirm you, but its usually not worth the trouble. — xaosflux ^Talk 03:16, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your kindly advice, but I do not think it is necessary. I will just wait. Thank you.--94rain ^Talk 03:22, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Special:AbuseFilter/72

Latest comment: 5 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion

Hi,

Could you please fix this filter so that it doesn't match "page" after any word ending with "y", e.g. "Larry Page"?

Thanks,

Orlodrim (talk) 20:24, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

@Orlodrim: Can you please reference who made the edit attempt. The filter isn't that naive, there are a number of components that would take place, so if we can at least mention the editor, then we can look at the issue. This is predominantly a filter that catches spambots, so it is very busy, and finding a false positive in among the stream of real p+ves can be a challenge. — billinghurst sDrewth 01:45, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Noting that I have made a tweak to the filter to look for a phrase termination, however, the above information would be good to allow for a re-test. — billinghurst sDrewth 01:49, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

@Billinghurst:

Thanks for updating the filter. It works for the edit that was initially reported as a false positive, namely fr:Special:AbuseLog/2409751. However, due to normalization, "phrase termination" is basically "page termination", so it might prevent good detections too.

On the other hand, is the "y" really useful? I tried to understand why it was there, and I found more false positives: Special:AbuseLog/552157, Special:AbuseLog/552298.

Orlodrim (talk) 07:12, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

There was also a coding error in /72, which I have amended. In the second batch of errors, I will see what we can do about the first, the second doesn't concern me, that is just junk edits. Let us keep watching, it will never be error free. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:13, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Just to be clear, the main point of my previous message was that I suspect that your first fix could decrease the efficiency of the filter. For instance, Special:AbuseLog/551215 is no longer detected. The second half was a suggestion of another possible fix in case you decide to undo the initial one. Orlodrim (talk) 12:14, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Undid the termination aspect. I am guessing that it was link to "y" as referring to "my", so we could be more specific in that regard. — billinghurst sDrewth 21:29, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

ready steady girls stopped by spam filter

Latest comment: 5 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

(cross-posted from https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Project_chat)

I wonder if readysteadygirls.eu - a pretty good blog on European female 1960s pop singers imo - is stopped by the spam filter for actual abuse, or if it's caught by some "suspected porn" heuristic based on the domain name? Not a huge deal, but personally/anecdotally I've found this to be a well-kept and information dense website dedicated to female musicians. Moebeus (talk) 16:34, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

@Moebeus: I can try to look this up for you. Did this block an edit you tried to make? If so on which project, to which page, and when? — xaosflux ^Talk 18:06, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

@Xaosflux: I only noticed it when I tried to link an artist in Wikidata to an article about her on the readysteadygirls.eu site using the https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P973 ("described at URL"). I was not allowed to save with the UI displaying a red error box explaining that the domain was blocked by the spam filter. It happened yesterday. Thanks in advance! EDIT: The exact page I was trying to link to was http:// www.readysteadygirls.eu /rosalia/ 4544298600 but even the editor here won't let me save it ;) Moebeus (talk) 18:12, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

@Moebeus: ok I looked up your block, it is:

2019-02-18T18:18:26 Moebeus (talk | contribs) caused a spam blacklist hit on Rosalía (Q5394851) by attempting to add http://www.readysteadygirls.eu/rosalia/4544298600 http://www.readysteadygirls.eu/rosalia/4544298600.

This was not a Global Abusefilter hit, it is a global Spam blacklist hit. See the header at Talk:Spam blacklist for how to proceed. — xaosflux ^Talk 18:58, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

@Xaosflux: Aha, thank you for investigating! Moebeus (talk) 19:02, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Special:AbuseFilter/171

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Hello, there are several reports of false positives for this filter on frwiki :

Is there any problem with these modifications or is this a false positive of filter ?

Thank you for any information... --Shawn (talk) 14:30, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

There is also a complaint about this filter on Estonian Wikipedia. Abuse log shows 40 disallowed edits by 5 anonymous users over the past week. Among these 40 edits I find only one abusive edit. User:علاء, I see you were the last one to modify this filter, so could you please have look. Pikne 08:18, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello @Shawn and Pikne: fixed --Alaa :)..! 10:20, 11 July 2019 (UTC)