Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2016/Votes/Tufor

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Tufor

[edit]
ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: pl-N, en-2
  • Personal info: (English)
    Serwus!

    My wikiname is tufor and I would like to serve global community as a steward.

    I have been pl.wikipedia administrator for year and a half now. I also have sysop rights on pl.wikimedia. Once in a while I like to answer an e-mail or two in OTRS system (I have an access to info-pl and info-pl-baninfo queues). For some time I held global rollbacker rights but in June 2015 I requested to have them removed.

    I might be known from my presence on IRC channels, most notably #wikimedia-stewards, where I often idle. And when something action-worthy catches my eye, I report it there to those with global mops.

    As a steward I would like to continue doing what I've been doing for about a year – but by myself :-) That means dealing with LTAs, spambots and handling IRC requests. Moreover, I might come in handy with handling requests on meta and renaming user accounts.

    Even though I surely won't be the most active steward (I'd describe my planned activity level as 'moderate' ;) I think I still might be useful.

    Well, it's up to you, dear community, if you would like me to have these rights ;) May the Force be with you,

    tufor (talk) 20:56, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Withdraw: I withdraw my candidature from the elections as it has no chance of succeeding and there is no point in further continuing. I really appreciate every bit of support I was given and acknowledge reasons of those who voted against or neutral. Thank you all! See you around ;-) tufor (talk) 09:43, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2016/Questions#Tufor


Yes

[edit]
  1. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 • --Gereon K. (talk) 14:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  User often makes valid requests for steward assitance. Electing him could reduce the workload for stewards and since we lost a lot of stewards this/last year I do believe the other stewards could use his help. Also, giving up rights when you are to busy/not using it enough is a great quality so this can only be an plus. Natuur12 (talk) 15:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Holder (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 • --Holder (talk) 15:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Vituzzu (talk) 15:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. RadiX (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  RadiX∞ 15:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Żyrafał (talk) 15:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       GodeNehler (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter) •  GodeNehler (talk) 16:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Arbnos (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Arbnos (talk) 16:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Wieralee (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Wieralee (talk) 17:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Sevimleribo (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter) •  Sevimleribo (talk) 17:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Ejensyd (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Ejensyd (talk) 18:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  ~Cybularny Speak? 20:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. OlEnglish (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Net positive. OlEnglish (Talk) 20:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Per Natuur12 and OlEnglish. Miniapolis 20:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Euphydryas (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Euphydryas (msg) 21:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Emptywords (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Emptywords (talk) 22:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Doctore (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Doctore→∞ 22:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Nedops (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Nedops (talk) 22:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Mo Cuishle (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Mo Cuishle (talk) 22:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. White Master (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  White Master (es) 22:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Pnapora (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Pnapora (talk) 23:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Zeljko (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Zeljko (talk) 00:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Myopic pattern (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Myopic pattern (talk) 01:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. NickK (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  A bit prematurate in my opinion but I found answers pretty convincing — NickK (talk) 02:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Hedwig in Washington (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Hedwig in Washington (talk) 04:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Hamsterlopithecus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Hamsterlopithecus (talk) 05:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Michał Sobkowski (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Michał Sobkowski (talk) 07:13, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  eurodyne (talk) 08:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Andrzei111 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Andrzei111 (talk) 08:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Mkw98 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Mkw98 (talk) 09:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Sir Lothar (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Active, reliable person. Great knowledge of Wikimedia projects. Sir Lothar (talk) 11:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Babymissfortune (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Babymissfortune (talk) 11:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Vinckie (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Vinckie (talk) 12:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Ellery (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Ellery (talk) 13:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Definitely. One of those helpful users on IRC. Him being granted stewardship would reduce the workload for the others. Trijnsteltalk 13:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Buggia (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  --Buggia 14:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Ptjackyll (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Ptjackyll (talk) 15:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Zbrnajsem (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Zbrnajsem (talk) 16:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       "Coreytaylor" (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley) •  "Coreytaylor" (talk) 17:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Don't see why not. Agree with Trijnstel. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Elfhelm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Elfhelm (talk) 19:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Micpol (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Micpol (talk) 20:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Silvanka (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley) •  Silvanka (talk) 20:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Rzuwig► 21:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Halibutt (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Halibutt (talk) 22:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Risk Engineer (Not eligible, checked by Vogone) •  Risk Engineer (talk) 00:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  cyrfaw (talk) 12:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Veleius (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Veleius
  45. Stanko (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Stanko (talk) 13:51, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Kolega2357 (talk) 15:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Rxy (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  per Trijnstel. Active at IRC. Maybe helpful when urgent. rxy (talk) 17:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  48. MikeZah (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016 •  MikeZah (talk) 22:37, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Павел Петро (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Павел Петро (talk) 06:44, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No

[edit]
  1. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  I'm sorry, but I don't see much cross-wiki activity (about 90% of edits in one wiki, and that when the candidate was a Global Rollbacker before). Also he doesn't have much administrative experience (only a sysop on one wiki), as also demonstrated in the answer to the question from Teles. --MF-W 14:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Insufficient global experience for me to support --Herby talk thyme 14:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  I'm not convinced by the answers to the questions and do not feel the crosswiki experience suffices. --Vogone (talk) 14:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 14:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Not active enough on cross-wiki activities. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Roland Kutzki (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 • --Roland Kutzki (talk) 15:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  This is a tough call. I appreciate that they are making requests that a steward would handle, and are a pl.wikipedia admin, but I would prefer two years of activity and a bit more crosswiki or functionary experience first (only other adminship is on pl.wikimedia, not a content wiki). I also have concerns about them remaining active throughout their term considering their global rollbacker resignation. Please don't be discouraged from running again in the future, if this does not succeed. Rschen7754 15:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Not enough cross-wiki activity, and only sysop on pl.wikipedia + pl.wikimedia. –Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 15:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]
  10. Ulflarsen (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Ulflarsen (talk) 15:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Mh7kJ (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Per above. Mh7kJ (talk) 15:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  O.Koslowski (talk) 16:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. SPQRobin (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  SPQRobin (talk) 16:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Per above; I would be glad to support next year with more activity in cross-wiki areas. Ajraddatz (talk) 17:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Widr (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Widr (talk) 17:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Alan (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Alan (talk) 18:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Nrautava (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  lacking crosswiki experience Nrautava (talk) 18:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Asav (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Asav (talk) 18:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Lacks experience.[reply]
  19. Flyingfischer (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Flyingfischer (talk) 18:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Armbrust (talk) 18:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Wolmar (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Wolmar (talk) 21:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. ChristophThomas (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  ChristophThomas (talk) 21:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Mar del Este (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Mar del Este:)안녕하세요 (talk) 21:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Hubertl (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Hubertl (talk) 00:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. SQL (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  SQLQuery me! 00:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Teles (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 00:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Checkingfax (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Checkingfax (talk) 02:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Alexmar983 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  I do have the feeling that many candidacies this year are premature, including this one.--Alexmar983 (talk) 02:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Legoktm (talk) 03:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Hkjacksonhk (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Hkjacksonhk (talk) 03:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Yash! (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Yash! 04:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. MarchHare1977 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  MarchHare1977 (talk) 05:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Deb (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Deb (talk) 12:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. David1010 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  David1010 (talk) 12:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Lsanabria (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Lsanabria (talk) 13:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Vincenzo1492 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Vincenzo1492 (talk) 16:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Per above. --Uğurkenttalk 16:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. DCB (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  DCB (talk) 18:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. CLCStudent (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  CLCStudent (talk) 19:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Ernstol (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Ernstol (talk) 19:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Gorlingor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Gorlingor (talk) 01:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Fikir Mühendisi (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Fikir Mühendisi (talk) 10:13, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Wikitanvir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  I would support if the global experience was a bit higher. Sorry. — T. 13:45, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Drzewianin (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Drzewianin (talk) 19:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Jose Barreto Cegarra (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Jose Barreto Cegarra (talk) 20:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Discussed with others. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. MelanieN (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016 •  MelanieN (talk) 22:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Waka Waka (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Waka Waka (talk) 01:03, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

[edit]
  1. 6AND5 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 • --6AND5 (talk) 14:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jahaza (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Jahaza (talk) 15:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Krol111 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Krol111 (talk) 16:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Ganímedes (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Ganímedes (talk) 16:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Reguyla (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Just doesn't seem to have enough cross wiki experience. They do seem to know what they are doing and seem to have a good demeanor so not going to oppose either. Reguyla (talk) 19:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. HalanTul (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  HalanTul (talk) 02:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Jianhui67 talk★contribs 12:20, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Gimmy dd (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Gimmy dd (talk) 12:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Dealt well with Wikinger, so understands that component. I don't know enough for xwiki and other decision-making to vote for.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Ghiutun (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  The cross-wiki experience might not be enough. I'm not sure. Ghiutun 22:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Vfrickey (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Not sure that the IRC activity's enough to qualify candidate as a steward, but deferring this to other editors with more insight. loupgarous (talk) 04:28, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2016/Votes/Tufor&oldid=15339237"