Research talk:Community portal redesign/Opentask
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Steven (WMF) in topic Comments
Comments
[edit]- We should supply absolute numbers for first opentask funnel chart as well as percents
- We should try and get a rough baseline for comparison at the top of the funnel by using pageviews, available at http://stats.grok.se/en/latest30/Wikipedia:Community_portal
Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 20:03, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
- Absolute numbers added. I don't have exact numbers from the first stage (unique clicks), but the historical baseline is about 80k for 11 days.
- The problem with using pageviews is that they're not unique, so it's an even rougher metric to judge against. Maryana (WMF) (talk) 00:03, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- Just noticed I left off a zero in the unique clicks --> unique accepts conversion in the graph! Image fixed now. Maryana (WMF) (talk) 00:09, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- Even something slightly flawed like comparing unique clicks out of pageviews is still more insightful than nothing as a baseline. Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 18:56, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- Also, per my comment inline ("Add timespan here") we should note in the results how long the data collection went on for. Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 21:54, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- Just noticed I left off a zero in the unique clicks --> unique accepts conversion in the graph! Image fixed now. Maryana (WMF) (talk) 00:09, 31 October 2012 (UTC)