Requests for new languages/Wikipedia Dutch (real)

Real Dutch Wikipedia

submitted	verification	final decision

	This proposal has been closed as part of a reform of the request process. This request has not necessarily been rejected, and new requests are welcome. This decision was taken by the language committee in accordance with the Language proposal policy. The closing committee member provided the following comment: This discussion was created before the implementation of the Language proposal policy, and it is incompatible with the policy. Please open a new proposal in the format this page has been converted to (see the instructions). Do not copy discussion wholesale, although you are free to link to it or summarise it (feel free to copy your own comments over). —{admin} Pathoschild 01:03:23, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Proposal summary
Language details: Real Dutch ([no code]) Editing community: Waerth (P) List your user name if you're interested in editing the wiki. Add "N" next to your name if you are a native speaker of this language. Relevant pages: — External links: —
Please read the handbook for requesters for help using this template correctly.

Although no iso code I want to request this because of the growing habit to name articles and names in any language but Dutch. When trying to correct this they complain that in their language that they are studying the name is written like that, totally forgetting that we are the Dutch wikipedia. They are not open for any change on that and slowly but surely we see all kinds of strange eastern european names popping up. When addressing the point and moving thai articles to a Thai name as per their rationale they get upset. So I want to request a new Dutch wikipedia in which Dutch will really be the language we use. Waerth 17:55, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Sorry, but this sounds like utter nonsense. By the way, I don't get your point. Do you refer to exonymes like Beijing for Peking? Or Usâmatu-bnu-Lâdin fot Osama bin Laden? Or just Uganda instead of Oeganda. In the latter case, the etymological spelling is just the most usual one. In the former cases, things like these may irritate the reader, but can nullo modo make the Dutch wiki unworkable. Man, I am a frequent user myself (in the sense that I often read pages; edits are scarser) and I never had any trouble with thing like these. Your proposal is sheer obstruction of one of the most flourishing Wikipedias we have. Please drop this idea. It leads to nothing.--Caesarion 00:13, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Oppose: No sense and not references. --Taichi - (?!) 22:15, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --ARBE0 10:48, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]