Meta:Requests for checkuser/Mardetanha

Mardetanha

Hello all,

There is continued disruption at Meta, particularly from the cross-wiki vandals/trolls, yet the CheckUsers at Meta have in some cases been slow to keep up with the need for CU data. I'd like to ask you to add Mardetanha to the Meta CU team. He has experience as a CU on other wikis, and is currently a steward. Mard is still involved in SWMT, which is ideal for Meta CUs in particular.

Thanks, – mike@meta:~$ 17:51, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the nomination , i would be happy to serve as CU in meta, i hope i could have community's trust for this role on meta :) Mardetanha ^talk 18:28, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Err - who has been slow at responding? (not a comment on Mardetanha btw) --Herby ^{talk thyme} 18:14, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
What Herby said. --dferg ^{☎ talk} 18:56, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Me! Maybe others, but certainly me – mike@meta:~$ 20:51, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Question: - Mardetanha, you are a CheckUser at commons but are very rarely active. If you were promoted here would you plan on being active? Tiptoety ^talk 18:53, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
As i already mentioned in commons page , due commons block in iran i have really restricted access to commons that is why i am not really in active in commons , though apparently from yesterday blocking was lifted in some parts of country but it's still blocked in my town . Mardetanha ^talk 18:58, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In fairness I encouraged Mardetanha to retain the rights on Commons knowing his situation. Things change and hopefully he will be able to be active there again. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 07:52, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Mardetanha is a trusted user with CheckUser experience, and after their response to my question I am confident they will put the tools to good use. Tiptoety ^talk 19:17, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per gents on the above. I even think we at meta community can make ourselves an exemption of steward policy "not to use the power on your own community". We've been doing so on desysoping already, and in the earlier days stewards promote admin candidates without being "promoted" to local bureaucrats. --Aphaia 08:50, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support, sure. Meta is not a project that can have too many of any kind of user group, as the project is the host of global vandal fighting and therefore full of people who know what they're doing. The more people have the rights the faster things are going and the easier all people can find time to do other things on their respective home wikis. :) --თოგო ^(D) 11:00, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Trusted person. Diego Grez ^{return fire} 20:54, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - If people with this tool are needed, so we should give it out to trusted users. -Barras 20:59, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Trusted user with plenty of experience (judging by the user rights log). No concerns here. Jafeluv 21:01, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support. PeterSymonds 10:36, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support, trusted user, active steward, have my support. Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:05, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support fr33kman ^{t - c} 04:26, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jan eissfeldt 11:59, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Trusted to do a good job. Pmlineditor ∞ 11:38, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
support —DerHexer (Talk) 16:40, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support certainly --Herby ^{talk thyme} 16:56, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Certo che sì! --M/ 16:58, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sure, he's trustworthy ;) --Church of emacs talk · contrib 18:32, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support, because a current checkuser indicates that they could use the help and Mardetanha is an excellent candidate. --Erwin 20:00, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - @lestaty ^discuţie 23:34, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Trust is nice, sure, and he has that, but importantly I think he's got the experience to use the tool correctly. Kylu 00:13, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support. User with plenty of experience as steward. Ruy Pugliesi^◥ 19:38, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support --dferg ^{☎ talk} 22:20, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
sure --Mercy 08:05, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Trusted user. –BruTe ^talk 18:04, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Maximillion Pegasus 01:56, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Of course. Kanonkas 09:36, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Why not? -FASTILY ^(TALK) 20:38, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

25 supports as needed for passing RfCU. No objections. Closed as successful. -Barras 20:46, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]