Meta:Requests for adminship/Svartava 2

Svartava

Svartava (talk • contribs • deleted user contributions • logs • block log • abuse log • CentralAuth • stalktoy) Bureaucrats: user rights management.

Not ending before 8 March 2025 18:26 (UTC)

Hi all. I am once again starting a request for Meta adminship.

At my first request, it was suggested that I could have a better chance if I applied later. The main concern was about the timing of the RFA, which has hopefully been taken care of by now.
I have almost 5000 edits (including ~ 1600 deleted ones) here and as before, I regularly do a lot of work for which having the admin tools would result in a better efficiency and productivity.
I am also active cross-wiki and as of now, I believe I have decent experience with adminship on my home wiki.

My primary usage of the admin tools would be, predictably, to help out against vandalism and other disruptive edits and monitoring speedy deletion requests. I am also interested in gaining a new experience and learning from it, which would overall help me in constantly bettering my contributions across different wikis. Svārtava (t ɕ) 18:26, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support - since the first RfA, you've made around 680 edits on Meta with little or no concerns. Clear need for the tools and issues from the previous, borderline RfA have been resolved --Arcticocean ■ 18:44, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I have checked all your recent edits and have not found any issues. – DreamRimmer (talk) 18:54, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sounds fair enough, also lot of deleted edits. --aqurs ❄️ 19:00, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've opposed their first adminship request due to the timing concerns. Some time passed, over the last months I've seen a bunch of deletion requests and rollbacks, all of them were substantiated. Therefore I'm happy to Support this request now. --TenWhile6 19:15, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Meruleh {talk} 22:36, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ten; 4 months is more than enough time. Given this user's extensive anti-vandalism history, no reason why not to support. //shb (t • c) 22:50, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support happy to support this time around. thanks for your help here! Ternera (talk) 01:52, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mtarch11 (talk) 02:17, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Codename Noreste (talk) 02:57, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 07:14, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support thanks for volunteering! --Wüstenspringmaus _talk 07:39, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support - XXBlackburnXx (talk) 09:19, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support - the kerfuffle around their first request was unnecessary. Leaderboard (talk) 09:40, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --M/ (talk) 11:21, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 12:29, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mobashir - 🇧🇩 (talk) 06:49, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]