Meta:Requests for adminship/MZMcBride
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.
RfA scheduled to end at 23:30, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Nominating MZMcBride for adminship. He's an active user, very helpful. I think he'll by quite a benefit to Meta. He's an admin on enwiki. bastique demandez! 23:26, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I graciously accept the nomination. --MZMcBride 23:30, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- « nomination » ?… vous pouvez même dire « désignation », « cooptation », Cher Ami, puisque toute opinion contraire est immédiatement effacée par la Famille. --Budelberger 22:08, 13 December 2008 (UTC) (). (Félicitations ! vous êtes un Master, même ici, dans « Meta », pour profit glorieuse famille Consanguins.)[reply]
- Support Daniel (talk) 23:45, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Finn Rindahl 00:48, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Thank you for your helpful contributions on this project. Cirt (talk) 04:28, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- support. --Thogo (talk) 13:34, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support He is amazing in the MediaWiki space. MBisanz talk 16:10, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support--Nick1915 - all you want 16:30, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support OhanaUnitedTalk page 22:26, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Won't kill Metawiki or anything like that, so sure. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 05:45, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 06:15, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Marbot 19:35, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --.snoopy. ✉ 20:19, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - User mentioned (on chat) that he was concerned about his lack of opposition. Unwilling to let down a friend, I'm morally opposing his adminship, but underhandedly supporting it (see the green plussy thingy). Pretend I wrote something terrible about his [[poor [grammar|spelling]]|[lack of [morals|ethics]|[terrible [attitude|odor|interpersonal skills|acne scars]] here. Ja mata! Kylu 03:01, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support trustworthy, active, makes helpful contributions. What more could we want from an admin? Anonymous101 21:13, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support per all above --mardetanha 21:36, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Melancholie 22:32, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Fabexplosive The archive man 11:32, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Budelberger 11:48, 12 December 2008 (UTC) ().All editors with an account on Meta, at least one active account on any Wikimedia project, and a link between the two, may participate in any request and give their opinion of the candidate.[reply]
- support, of course. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 11:52, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support good interactions with the user & they should be helpful in the mediawiki namespace. --Kanonkas 16:16, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Erwin(85) 21:46, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Leinad 22:46, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Clear consensus so MZMcBride is our new admin --Mardetanha talk 23:30, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]