Meta:Requests for adminship/BRPever

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

BRPever

BRPever (talk • contribs • deleted user contributions • logs • block log • abuse log • CentralAuth • stalktoy) Bureaucrats: user rights management.

Not ending before 20 June 2022 01:37 (UTC)

Hello all, I am BRPever. I have been active on Metawiki for a few years now, mostly in the SR pages but occasionally in other areas that I find interesting. When I am around, I am watching recent changes, so these tools will be helpful there. The main reason I am requesting this tool is because there are areas that I am not comfortable acting with my steward bits. Those areas involve things specifically concerning metawiki like page protection and other general tasks that I would be more comfortable dealing with in this role. Thank you for your consideration.--BRP^ever 01:37, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support LGTM. Steward, active, trusted user with a valid use case. Thank you for volunteering, Vermont 🐿️ (talk) 01:45, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Don't think there's a reason not to. The more admins, the better. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 01:49, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Mykola ^talk 01:49, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 01:57, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Very trusted user and steward. AlPaD (talk) 04:55, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rs chen 7754 05:09, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -FASTILY 07:01, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support ‐‐1997kB (talk) 07:33, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- EN-Jungwon 07:50, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support trusted user --Johannnes89 (talk) 07:51, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support reasonable use case, active & familiar with the tools — that's a yes from me! — TNT (talk • she/her) 13:50, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support --Victor Trevor (talk) 14:12, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 16:04, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. —— Eric Liu_（Talk） 16:14, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Obviously. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 17:33, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support No problems here --Ferien (talk) 17:34, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support —MdsShakil (talk) 17:37, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support I thought this is already a case. No issues => supporting --Martin Urbanec (talk) 18:27, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support, of course. Stang 19:36, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Sgd. —Hasley 04:00, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Prince 13:19, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support I have interacted with this user before and I see no issues. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 15:15, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support I see no problem with this guy being an admin, so why not? --DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 18:41, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Defender (talk) 01:58, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support, a great addition to the team. --WhitePhosphorus (talk) 14:07, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support LGTM --DannyS712 (talk) 03:51, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Sorry I am late, thanks for the offer to help. I am always thinking you will be a good addition and why you haven't asked for the access, so am happy to see this at last. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 11:20, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yay. --Sotiale (talk) 00:43, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support C'mon is this even a vote? ;-). I'm quite surprised that BRPever isn't an admin on meta. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 11:25, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Successful. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 08:25, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above request page is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Comments about this page should be made in Meta:Babel or Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat.