Merchandise giveaways/Nominations/Archive 1

The Earwig

Nominated by: Legoktm (talk) 20:52, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?

User:The Earwig is awesome for a lot of reasons. He is active in the Articles for creation project writing bots to help the process along, wrote the bot which maintains the Dispute resolution noticeboard, and is currently working on a tool that helps editors find copyvios faster and easier. All-around, Earwig is a great editor and an awesome Wikipedian. Legoktm (talk) 20:52, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support

Support Very active in AFC. He is in the house for a long time and has done lots of good works. He has a nice userpage (that's not a reason to support, but, I like it). --Tito Dutta (talk) 19:42, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done Moved to Who has shirts (Which is still kinda draft and ugly if anyone has ideas :) ). Will archive nomination in 48 hours Jalexander--WMF 00:18, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Legoktm

Nominated by: -— Isarra ༆ 20:45, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?

He just is. He let me kidnap him for Uncyclopedia. Wikipedians are astoundingly helpful folk, but that just takes it to new levels of... whatever it is. I'm sure he does lovely stuff on Wikimedia projects, too, but I'm less familiar with that, though he is also getting started with OTRS... -— Isarra ༆

Support

Support Yep. AutomaticStrikeout 02:28, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good editor! --Tito Dutta (talk) 03:10, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Helpful; uses Python. --ori (talk) 10:12, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Why the heck shouldn't I? Thine Antique Pen (talk) 22:21, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done Moved to Who has shirts (Which is still kinda draft and ugly if anyone has ideas :) ). Will archive nomination in 48 hours Jalexander--WMF 00:19, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Worm That Turned

Nominated by: Beeblebrox (talk) 22:56, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?

Well known as the most patient mentor on en.wp. Willing to try and help users that grouchy old bastards like myself have already given up on. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:56, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support

Strongest possible support I don't really know what the protocol is for supporting or opposing these, but I think a t-shirt is the least we can do to thank Worm. I couldn't agree more that he's the most patient admin on the project (at least that I've come across). Go Phightins! 23:16, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Best editor by far - undisputed and uncontested! ツ Jenova20 ^(email) 00:17, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support - WTT is a very worthy nominee for their efforts in many areas but, in particular, their work with adoptees. - Sitush (talk) 19:01, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Big hugs all 'round. Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:05, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Rcsprinter (Gimme a message) @ 17:45, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Maybe the best editor we have. AutomaticStrikeout 18:12, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support for definite.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 23:55, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
--Andreas JN466 01:59, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nikkimaria (talk) 12:46, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Malleus Fatuorum 14:32, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Exceptional editor and admin who had done a great deal with new editors, editor retention and to promote a more fair environment for everyone here. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 13:05, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Outstanding Hobit (talk) 20:42, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Begoon ^talk 02:24, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
FiachraByrne (talk) 02:43, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 13:59, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Excellent editor! --Tito Dutta (talk) 22:13, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fine chap.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 01:23, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
For work with the Adoptions project. - jc37 19:01, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done Moved to Who has shirts (Which is still kinda draft and ugly if anyone has ideas :) ). Will archive nomination in 48 hours Jalexander--WMF 00:19, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, too late to support - but delighted to see he's Got The T-Shirt. PamD 16:32, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moonriddengirl

Nominated by: Dcoetzee Dcoetzee 21:48, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?

In both her role as a community volunteer and her new role, Moonriddengirl has tirelessly worked to fix serious problems that no one else will, and to mentor people who have struggled to become positive contributors, while maintaining a superhuman level of patience and friendliness. COI notice: she is a friend of mine, but I can't imagine anyone on the project disagreeing with this assessment.

Support

Agree, she pretty much is the COPYVIO investigations arm of en.wp. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:58, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, one of the top editors we have, and someone I truly look up to and respect. Moonriddengirl is the best example of a selfless Wikipedian I can think of. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 01:35, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
per beeblebrox, and I like how she is always happy to discuss anything to come to mutual understanding. - jc37 04:50, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Like Dennis Brown says. - Sitush (talk) 19:05, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely. Maggie does awesome work, with or without her WMF hat. Steven Zhang ^{Help resolve disputes!} 19:42, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Buy her two. --Floquenbeam (talk) 03:15, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing to add. Irreplaceable. Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:05, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
—Deor (talk) 13:31, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And the little black dress, and something comfortable but stylish for winter, and maybe some expensive shoes. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 16:27, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely invaluable for her volunteer copyright work, and again as a WMF link. JohnCD (talk) 18:11, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This was an obvious choice. Moonriddengirl is awesome. Silverseren^C 20:41, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Anyone who deals with Copyvios deserves acknowledgement and MRG is the person I know best from that area.--Peter cohen (talk) 21:54, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
MRG for da win. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:39, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Of course. Thehelpfulone 01:36, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
+1. Andreas JN466 01:58, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like the editors above have enough confidence that I don't mind agreeing. AutomaticStrikeout 02:37, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious. Nikkimaria (talk) 12:46, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Never had a direct encounter, but seen her around and based on the supports from Floquenbeam, Dennis, Steven, and Beeblebrox, * I have sufficient confidence that the times I've seen her around weren't isolated incidents. Go Phightins! 13:06, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Malleus Fatuorum 14:31, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
--j⚛e decker ^talk 16:37, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely. Garion96 (talk) 20:10, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutley agree, the go-to person for copyvio issues, and unfailingly helpful. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:16, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Does yeoman work on a difficult and contentious problem. Service above and beyond the call of duty. She helps keep our standards where they must be. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:52, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely! LadyofShalott 23:34, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No question at all. Very awesome. - Bilby (talk) 01:27, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Piling on. Begoon ^talk 02:24, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
One of the few people standing between us and an infinitely long Wikipedia:Copyright problems. MER-C 12:31, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 13:57, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Her work on copyright issues alone, and there's much more. --SPhilbrick (Talk) 14:05, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
She bravely faces the frankly terrifying issue of COPYVIO on a daily basis. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 14:39, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutley agree, the go-to person for copyvio issues, and unfailingly helpful. Maggie does awesome work, with or without her WMF hat. No question at all. Very awesome. Absolutely! Drmies (talk) 16:15, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Helpful, friendly, tireless --Tito Dutta (talk) 19:38, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Wait, I didn't support MRG already? What was I thinking? — Coren ^(talk) 03:13, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Per Coren. Hiding T 17:29, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Strongest possible support here. Wizardman 03:17, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Without a doubt one of the most significant contributors in the history of Wikipedia. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:37, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No need to think this one over. Strongest possible support. --Dweller (talk) 18:20, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Shrigley (talk) 04:17, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
--Sonicyouth86 (talk) 14:27, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely --Hu12 (talk) 05:47, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Because copyright matters! PamD 16:29, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Torreslfchero (talk) 13:12, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Of course. Bencherlite ^Talk 00:28, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kumioko (talk) 02:52, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done Moving to Who has shirts (Which is still kinda draft and ugly if anyone has ideas :) ). She has quite a bit of merch from me already (and a watch award from Jimmy! However, we will find something special for her ;) . Will archive nomination in 48 hours Jalexander--WMF 01:46, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dennis Brown

Nominated by: David1217 ^{What I've done} 01:18, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?

Dennis always has a great perspective, and isn't afraid to give a frank answer even if it's not what someone wants to hear. In addition, he's a great admin who is knowledgable and helpful. He deserves a shirt! David1217 ^{What I've done} 01:18, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support

Support If Worm is 1, Dennis is 1A. Go Phightins! 01:28, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with Worm and Dennis' noms ...but now horribly afraid how far down the list I am! (✉→BWilkins←✎) 11:41, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support - a one-off variation of the "I edit Wikipedia" shirt that appends the word "calmly" would be particularly apt but the vanilla edition will have to suffice ;) - Sitush (talk) 19:04, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
is keen...why not? Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:05, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Deserves a wardrobe of them. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 16:25, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support What Phightins! said. AutomaticStrikeout 18:13, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Role model user.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 23:57, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thehelpfulone 01:38, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nikkimaria (talk) 12:46, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Malleus Fatuorum 14:31, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks to everyone who was kind enough to voice an opinion here, but I have a conflict of interest here and have to withdraw my name for consideration. I can't be here and at the same time promote the program at WikiProject Editor Retention. The sincere and kind comments are appreciated, and perhaps some of you can join us at WP:WER, helping us promote great projects like this, and helping us find new ways to reward and keep quality editors here at Wikipedia. So please, there are an abundance of exceptional editors here, please show them your appreciation and don't vote for me. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 13:02, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Even though he's withdrawn from consideration, I'll add my support: one of the most patient people I've encountered on Wikipedia, and a standard by which tendentiousness and disruptiveness can be measured: if Dennis loses his patience, the editor is clearly not neing beyond hope. Even if he doesn't get a t-shirt ("I edited Wikipedia, and all I got is this lousy T-shirt"), I encourage him to keep it up. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:20, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Dennis may feel he shouldn't be considered, but he is very deserving for all his patient work. LadyofShalott 23:37, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I can't see any provision for withdrawal, Dennis , so I guess you'll need to let us Support... Just donate it to your favourite charity if you win. Begoon ^talk 02:24, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Just send me the shirt, Dennis. You're a great asset as an editor and an admin. Drmies (talk) 16:25, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed! Joefromrandb (talk) 03:57, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Wasn't going to comment here since he has struck his name. But since the reason doesn't appear to be that he doesn't want it, but rather merely due to (what seem to me to be) humility reasons, I think all the more reason to give him a shirt despite himself : ) - jc37 18:54, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Very wise and fair. Gandydancer (talk) 01:08, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
support anyways --Hu12 (talk) 05:47, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Great guy, huge asset. — sparklism ^hey! 15:22, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Goes way, way, way out of his way to make sure that he is communicating clearly and politely. Always considers the possibility he is mistaken (though he rarely is). If half of editors conducted themselves on talk pages the way Dennis does, AN/I would be closed for lack of participation. In the future, either once he's un-recused himself or been overridden in that recusal, I know no editor (bits or none) more deserving of the community's esteem. ☯.Zen Swashbuckler.☠ 21:51, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Very well put!! Joefromrandb (talk) 03:01, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done Moving to Who has shirts (Which is still kinda draft and ugly if anyone has ideas :) ). Will archive nomination in 48 hours Jalexander--WMF 01:47, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Meno25

Nominated by: Anonymous user

Why is this user awesome?

Created 4th million article on EnWp.

Support

Submitted through the google doc by a user who wishes to remain anonymous! Jalexander--WMF 02:43, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support: 88,000 edits, has been editing since 2006. Hoops This editor has made 32 thousand edits in October 2012! --Tito Dutta (talk) 22:18, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done Moving to Who has shirts (Which is still kinda draft and ugly if anyone has ideas :) ). Will archive nomination in 48 hours Jalexander--WMF 01:47, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welsh

Nominated by: Anonymous user

Why is this user awesome?

A long-standing, hard-working editor who gives a lot to the encyclopedia while seldom asking for anything in return.

Support

Submitted through the google doc by a user who wishes to remain anonymous! Jalexander--WMF 02:44, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support Excellent clean up works! --Tito Dutta (talk) 19:19, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done Moving to Who has shirts (Which is still kinda draft and ugly if anyone has ideas :) ). Will archive nomination in 48 hours Jalexander--WMF 01:48, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:MrADHD

Nominated by: Lova Falk talk 09:44, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?

Works so hard on ADHD and related articles. Friendly.

Support

Good work. Nice attitude. An asset to the project. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 19:42, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done Moving to Who has shirts (Which is still kinda draft and ugly if anyone has ideas :) ). Will archive nomination in 48 hours Jalexander--WMF 19:24, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Anthonyhcole

Nominated by: Lova Falk talk 09:49, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?

Many years of good service, dedicated, always looking for consensus. Friendly.

Support

Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:05, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely. --Andreas JN466 01:59, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nikkimaria (talk) 12:46, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
--Peter cohen (talk) 13:40, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Malleus Fatuorum 14:33, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Begoon ^talk 02:24, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
FiachraByrne (talk) 02:43, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes
— Berean Hunter (talk) 14:07, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Drmies (talk) 16:20, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely --Hu12 (talk) 05:47, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Lots of passion and drive, and undoubtedly here to improve the encyclopedia. And has. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 23:31, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A solid, patient editor who always manages to be civil. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:^simple/_complex 11:50, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done Moving to Who has shirts (Which is still kinda draft and ugly if anyone has ideas :) ). Will archive nomination in 48 hours Jalexander--WMF 05:31, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wizardman

Nominated by: Anonymous user

Why is this user awesome?

Wizardman is the main driving force at Contributor Copyright Investigations, a severely backlogged but important area of Wikipedia maintenance.

Support

Submitted through the google doc by a user who wishes to remain anonymous! Jalexander--WMF 19:19, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:05, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A good editor. AutomaticStrikeout 18:21, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
CCI, sau no more. --Peter cohen (talk) 00:12, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
--Andreas JN466 02:00, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sine qua non. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 19:44, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
MER-C 12:32, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
— Berean Hunter (talk) 14:08, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
First class editor, I have not seen his works in CCI, but, I have seen his (great) work in some other spaces! With my good wishes, Tito Dutta (talk) 19:48, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, please : ) - jc37 22:04, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
For some strange reason this man continues to believe I serve some function. For that alone he deserves some commiseration. GRAPPLE X 03:36, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, please. Strong work. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:12, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
GamerPro64 03:58, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Long history of making Wikipedia better, one edit at a time. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 23:33, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Secret ^account 07:20, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done Moving to Who has shirts (Which is still kinda draft and ugly if anyone has ideas :) ). Will archive nomination in 48 hours Jalexander--WMF 05:31, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hildanknight

Nominated by: — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 06:23, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
Hildanknight has been very active working on Singapore-related articles, and has singlehandedly taken a significant number of them to Good Article status.

Support

Very devoted and kind editor. I've enjoyed peer reviewing his contributions. —WP:PENGUIN · ^{[ TALK ]} 03:58, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Sadly I haven't heard back from Hildanknight for a couple weeks. However I do still have him on the list and will try to get a hold of him for a shirt :) Will archive this in a couple days Jalexander--WMF 20:42, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mike_Selinker

Nominated by: jc37 03:21, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?

There are just innumerable reasons.

MS has been active helping out with many things on Wikipedia. For merely one example, he helped with the divergent structure of our category system back when it was mostly a gaggle of threads/chains. Doing many mass group nominations to help bring some sense of consistency of naming and structure in categories.

He is so humble, too often thinking that what he does is not as important as what others' do.

And is consistently and constantly a "go to" person for other editors.

As a "help out" person, I think we could all look to him for example.

Support

Support. I've not come across Mike that I can recall offhand, but a look at his contribution history (which goes back to 2005) definitely shows that he's put a lot of time and effort into editing Wikipedia, especially when it comes to the "behind the scenes" type of stuff.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 14:46, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Sadly I haven't heard from Mike for a couple weeks. However I do still have him on the list and will try to get a hold of him for a shirt :) Will archive this in a couple days Jalexander--WMF 20:44, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Malleus Fatuorum

Nominated by: Sitush (talk) 01:09, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
Yes, I realise that this nomination may cause some fireworks. However, for all the faults that are ascribed to him by some, Malleus Fatuorum has been and remains a prolific and knowledgeable contributor whose work here spans a huge range of our content and is rarely ill-informed. His work in fettling FAs and GAs must surely rank with the best and his accommodation and encouragement of new users - including the oft-maligned student programs - is self-evident on his (voluminous) talk page. His copyediting is absolutely outstanding, as is his continued presence and work to the Greater Good, despite occasional doubts and in the face of what is fundamentally little more than a systemic culture clash. No one, not even his detractors, can deny that this man has been a substantial asset to the real purpose of Wikipedia, which is the building of an encyclopaedia that is accessible to all. Would he wear a t-shirt? Well, I'm not so sure that it would be his style - but he deserves one even if he just frames the thing. (And I assume that, being US-centric, there will be a suitable size. Joke.) I rather suspect that this may be one of those issues where the WMF has to intervene and make a decision because I can hears the howls of protest from the regular Us vs. MF camps already. If this is how it has to be then it is how it has to be. I do know that Malleus was overcome with emotion when he attended a Wikimeet early on this year and realised, as previously he had not, that he was accepted by those whom he met for what he was: a highly productive Wikipedian of enormous integrity who has a genuine desire to make this project as good as it can be. For those who disagree with his methods, let's just admit that there is method, based on much consideration of the greater good, in what they consider to be his madness. - Sitush (talk) 01:09, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support
*There are times when I think blocking Malleus and throwing away the key would be a good idea. But then I come to the realization that Malleus, as this nomination said, truly does strive to improve the encyclopedia and do what he thinks his best. I don't always agree with his methods, but he is one of the most resilient Wikipedians on the project, and for that, he deserves a shirt. Go Phightins! 01:54, 16 November 2012 (UTC) This tells me there's no reason to waste a t-shirt for this purpose. I don't dispute that Malleus is dedicated and resilient, but there's no reason to give him a t-shirt solely so he can burn it. Go Phightins! 02:25, 16 November 2012 (UTC) Changed my mind again. Give him the t-shirt. Go Phightins! 17:40, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm simultaneously a little horrified, and deeply impressed, by this idea for a page. But since it exists, I can think of few more deserving. Don't worry, he's not really going to burn it. He's just being a grump. --Floquenbeam (talk) 03:13, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, I can think of few whose efforts deserve recognition more than Malleus, but I think giving him a t-shirt to burn would be poor resource management :) If he wants it, I say go ahead, but if he doesn't, there are at least five other users who've been nominated that we could give them to. Go Phightins! 03:19, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:05, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Deserves the T-shirt. What he does with it is up to him. (I plan on making a cushion-cover out of mine.) Anthonyhcole (talk) 16:22, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Lots of high quality content but lots of help given to people through copy-editing. Deserves recognition for his efforts at creating an encyclopedia.--Peter cohen (talk) 22:17, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Per Anthony H. Cole. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:40, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 23:53, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Puerile by every measure of the definition, yes, but can you say he's ever any less than entertaining? Give him his T-shirt, on condition that he does indeed provide a freely licensed video of him burning it in the street. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 01:30, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thehelpfulone 01:40, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ace copyeditor. --Andreas JN466 02:02, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
One of the most helpful Wikipedians out there. He's earned it. Nikkimaria (talk) 12:46, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'd consider myself fortunate were I a tenth the editor Malleus is. --j⚛e decker ^talk 16:35, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Great writer and cares deeply. Hobit (talk) 20:43, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Malleus and I have not always got on; whether he would welcome my endorsement of him I do not know and will not speculate. But while he has been known on occasion to be intemperate in his language I am quite certain that he has always had the best interests of the project at heart, and if he has sometimes caused debate, occasionally acrimonious, that is no bad thing. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:16, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Malleus has contributed to this encyclopedia with much writing, copyediting, and guidance to other editors new and old. Very deserving. LadyofShalott 23:41, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Begoon ^talk 02:24, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Malleus and I have disagreed on several things and each time it has been a positive learning experience for me. When I'm mistaken, his direct and honest input is always helpful. He goes out of his way to help others, and to return the same respect given to him, even when he disagrees. I've learned a great deal from him, and found him to be an excellent teacher to others who truly want to learn. His work to improve the quality of Wikipedia is noteworthy and he has clearly demonstrated he is one of our best assets when it comes to developing articles, the real reason we are all here. Wikipedia is a clearly a better encyclopedia because of his efforts. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 14:31, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What the Lady says... Drmies (talk) 16:14, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
His content development is legendary. How can i not support? ツ Jenova20 ^(email) 16:50, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I wouldn't blame Malleus for wiping his arse with it before he burns it. Joefromrandb (talk) 23:09, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
He's a fantastic content creator and copy-editor, who has done an incalculable amount of good for the encyclopaedia. the wub "?!" 01:00, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, this man deserves a free t-shirt.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 00:44, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
While I, like some others, wish that Malleus had a slightly different discourse style, I'm inclined to believe that he is, without a doubt, a true Wikipedian, who really does intend to make this a viable, useful, and accurate reference tool. And if he thinks that the best use of the t-shirt upon receiving it would be to burn it, because that would make Wikipedia better, well, then, I'm inclined to let him have it. We need our gadfly, our Socrates. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:01, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I doubt that he would wear one, but if the stash were in my house, and I could afford the postage, I would send him 366 – one every day of the year. His work on Moors murders, which IMHO is a paradigm of our policies, shows his true qualities. These also include his intolerance of foolishness. Malleus has never refused my requests for help and advice, and his responses have always been honest, productive and valuable. A most worthy recipient of a probably unwanted gift, but it's the thought and accolade that counts. Graham Colm (talk) 22:43, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Intelligent, honest and kind, and one of the best editors here. Gandydancer (talk) 00:59, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly not the most appropriate bit of merchandise for him. Never met him in real life and may have got this wrong, but I'd have thought an engraved tankard would be more his style. But whatever the physical object is I'm sure he deserves it. Ϣere SpielChequers 23:12, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your support, but an engraved tankard would be just about the most inappropriate gift I could imagine. I've never been one for a pint of foaming best ale with mine host down at Ye Olde Pork and Scratchings. Think instead of 16 pints of Stella with the Gallagher brothers of Oasis. Not that I've ever done that of course, but it's far more likely than me even owning an engraved tankard. Sorry to disappoint. Malleus Fatuorum 00:03, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the clarification, I shall adjust my mental image of you appropriately. Perhaps what is generally needed is for the WMF gift to be a choice for the recipient to make. Including something fire resistant for yourself. Some would choose a Tshirt, others an engraved glass, sandals with [citation needed] in the tread or having a star named after them. I appreciate it is looking a gift horse in the mouth, but on a global project it seems odd for such a gift program to be so culture specific. Ϣere SpielChequers 14:18, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Helped me with an article a while back. Deserves the shirt no matter what he plans to do with it! Ruby 2010/2013 02:46, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Awesome contributor. Binksternet (talk) 03:30, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I've waited a long time on this, mainly due to Malleus's stated intentions to burn the shirt should he get it, but there is no denying that Malleus has done a lot for Wikipedia. AutomaticStrikeout (Evidence) 00:04, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support: useful, helpful, and clued-up editor. We need more like him. PamD 16:33, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support poor reward for his work but a token of the respect that many have for him. Bencherlite ^Talk 00:28, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - An excellent but grumpy editor who deserves to get more than naught for his works to Wikipedia. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 03:53, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sadly NotDone I'll archive this in a couple days, the user has declined but the shirt is up for him to grab later if he desires Jalexander--WMF 20:33, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Thekohser

Nominated by: 76.191.143.69 (talk) 00:49, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?

He's done far more to make Wikipedia's content better than almost any WMF employee. Period.

Support

Deserves at least the T-Shirt. --Andreas JN466 02:06, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And appreciation for steadfastly holding up the mirror. (Goes for you too Andreas.) --Anthonyhcole (talk) 02:24, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Note that, for what it's worth, this user has been banned. AutomaticStrikeout 02:25, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
So what? Are the contributions of banned users considered to be of no value once they've been banned? Malleus Fatuorum 02:37, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A banned user can be worthy of a shirt regardless of his current Wikipedia status. I agree with Malleus Faturoum (talk · contribs), that banned user's contributions still have value even if they are blocked. But it would seem to be very unlikely that a now-banned user makes wonderful edits, because then the user would probably not be blocked most likely other than certain situations. TBr and ley 02:42, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I was only pointing it out for those who are interested. Also, giving them a t-shirt that says "I edit Wikipedia" doesn't make much sense. They don't edit Wikipedia anymore, do they? AutomaticStrikeout 02:43, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
My understanding is that they do. Doesn't MyWikiBiz involve some editing?--Peter cohen (talk) 13:39, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Myself, I wasn't trying to go at a personal attack, just was making a statement so. Sorry if it came across as a personal attack. A note seems fine, in my opinion. Take care, TBr and ley 02:47, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Who said anything about a personal attack? I didn't take it that way. AutomaticStrikeout 02:50, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks. TBr and ley 03:17, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you take off those rose-tinted spectacles TBrandley, making "wonderful edits" is no protection at all against being blocked. I have no idea whether Thekohser made "wonderful edits" or not, I simply don't see why the contributions of blocked editors ought not, in principle, entitle them to a "posthumously" awarded T-shirt. In fact I can think of at least one other indefinitely blocked user who deserves a T-shirt for his many fine contributions to literature articles. Malleus Fatuorum 03:03, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I have never reviewed this user's contributions either or ever spoke to him/her. I was just claiming why would a wonderful user be blocked, but I do also know of good blocked editors. TBr and ley 03:13, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(Edit conflict.)I'd still like to know why we should encourage a banned editor to wear a t-shirt that says "I edit Wikipedia" when they're banned? If they're banned, we don't want them editing Wikipedia. Giving them the t-shirt sends a very conflicting message. AutomaticStrikeout 03:14, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
We don't want to send conflicting messages, as I'm sure User:Jayen466 will agree. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 03:37, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Only one of the designs on offer says "I edit Wikipedia". Malleus Fatuorum 03:41, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well, if that is the case, then maybe it wouldn't be a big deal. Still, recognizing members that have been ejected from the community seems a little contradictory. AutomaticStrikeout 03:59, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - There is a difference between being blocked, and being banned. If the community has chosen to ban, then no. - jc37 03:47, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Though I agree that there are better editors to whom we could give free merchandise, I agree with Malleus that an oppose section is unnecessary. This doesn't need to turn into a mini-RFA. Go Phightins! 04:29, 17 November 2012 (UTC) [reply]

He asked nicely. :P --Vrave98 (talk) 11:42, 17 November 2012 (UTC) Note: this comment was originally in a duplicate section, which I've merged here to avoid having two sections for a single person. Nikkimaria (talk) 12:40, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If only to send out a signal that blocked/banned editors don't become non-persons overnight and their contributions up until that point worthless. Malleus Fatuorum 14:35, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Materialscientist

Nominated by: The Interior (Talk) 00:01, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
One of our hardest working volunteers, I would hate to think what we'd do without Materialscientist. The vandals would be rejoicing in the streets.

Support

Support Tough on ~~crime~~ vandalism! AutomaticStrikeout 00:27, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Invaluable. Throw in a couple of gold ingots. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 19:39, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Support User deserves it very much. He's been super helpful! --Webclient101^talk 02:16, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No Qs in supporting MS. Btw, if not now, I hope at in future even not-so-hardcore yet diligently committed volunteers like us are also viewed favourably in awarding this privilege. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 17:46, 18 November 2012 (UTC).[reply]
Yes Begoon ^talk 02:24, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Quite deserving as he is a vigilant and dedicated editor.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 14:13, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes he is. Drmies (talk) 15:20, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely. the wub "?!" 01:02, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Deserves it. Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 19:03, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Most certainly, yes --Hu12 (talk) 05:47, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, he seems to be everywhere, and always appropriate. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:13, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely. A great asset to wikipedia. Knowledgable to.--MrADHD | T@1k? 20:07, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Writing interesting and well-sourced science articles, fighting vandalism... this editor does it all. Very deserving. 28bytes (talk) 23:13, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sadly not done Materialscientist has declined for now but one is always available incase he wishes later. Jalexander--WMF 02:23, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Go Phightins!

Nominated by: Anonymous user

Why is this user awesome?
Does good work in many different areas: AfD, content work and vandalism-fighting, just to name a few. A very enthusiastic editor.

Support
Submitted through the google doc by a user who wishes to remain anonymous! Jalexander--WMF 03:32, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support Good editor. AutomaticStrikeout 04:02, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
We just met. Seems solid. ````Buster Seven Talk
When he has Maitre d duty at Teahouse, I think he never sleeps. A hard worker for new editor retention. Gtwfan52 (talk) 08:54, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done Moving to Who has shirts (Which is still kinda draft and ugly if anyone has ideas :) ). Will archive nomination in 48 hours or so Jalexander--WMF 02:23, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Doc James

Nominated by: User:Anthonyhcole (Talk)

Why is this user awesome?
Tireless patroller of medical articles, founder and president of WM:MED, driver of the medical translation project and Wikivoyage, peripatetic speaker at conferences, universities and medical schools, collaboration with the National Library of Medicine, Cochrane Collaboration, WHO, Open Medicine, etc., etc.

Support

Nikkimaria (talk) 12:46, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Malleus Fatuorum 14:30, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Per [1]. Though maybe the shirt should be custom made to include something like "I got sued for recommending Wikipedia to open content contributors and all I got was this lousy T-shirt." Wnt (talk) 04:54, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Begoon ^talk 02:24, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
FiachraByrne (talk) 02:43, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Drmies (talk) 16:22, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thehelpfulone 03:08, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A real asset to Wikipedia. Gandydancer (talk) 01:11, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Casliber (talk · contribs) 19:15, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Doc James is amazing not just for his uncanny ability to get sued :) but for all the great work he's done facilitating translations of vital medical articles into scores of different language Wikipedias. Strong support! Accedie^{talk to me} 01:25, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely yes. When I had to think of whether there was anyone I respected more than SandyGeorgia, DocJames was a very close second. Patient, fair, masterly on a talk page and he pulls bullets out of people for a living! Can we make the shirt out of gold? WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:^simple/_complex 11:56, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely. One of the most dedicated editors to the medical area.--MrADHD | T@1k? 19:49, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Lova Falk talk 08:21, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done Moving to Who has shirts (Which is still kinda draft and ugly if anyone has ideas :) ). Will archive nomination in 48 hours or so Jalexander--WMF 02:23, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lova Falk

Nominated by: User:Anthonyhcole (Talk)

Why is this user awesome?
Guardian of all articles medical/psychological. Always right (really).

Support

FiachraByrne (talk) 02:43, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Without a doubt. This lady is a psychologist who edits extensively on articles related to psychology, possibly being the most active editor in this topic area currently. Her edits are of a high quality and show good knowledge in the subject area. She is also warm, friendly and helpful to her fellow editors.--MrADHD | T@1k? 20:55, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A tough area to edit. Great having her dedication. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 15:27, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done Moving to Who has shirts (Which is still kinda draft and ugly if anyone has ideas :) ). Will archive nomination in 48 hours or so Jalexander--WMF 02:23, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Coren

Nominated by: Delicious carbuncle (talk) 17:12, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
By deleting List of pedophiles, Coren took decisive "ignore all rules" action to quickly address what was sure to become a BLP nightmare and troll magnet. Coren's deletion prevented what might have been a divisive and drawn-out deletion discussion. Coren's acknowledgement of the effects that Wikipedia articles and lists can have on BLP subjects deserves recognition.
Support
I would like to add a proviso to this nomiation - in the event that Dr. Blofeld returns from "retirement" and successfully manages to have the article restored through a deletion review, Coren must give the shirt to Blofeld. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 17:12, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No need for this proviso. Dr B has his own nomination below. And Dream Focus, who has challenged this deletion in a few places, also has a nomination. If any of the three gets a t-shirt for their activities in connection with the article, then Coren has acted the most wisely.--Peter cohen (talk) 21:24, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nominee's help in another situation. AutomaticStrikeout 22:21, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Andreas JN466 23:16, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yep. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 05:29, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, support. Good move, and Coren's done a lot of other good stuff too. Herostratus (talk) 23:36, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Begoon ^talk 02:24, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support but not because of this one deletion. Coren's years of service, dedication and hard work are the reasons why I support giving him the swag.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 14:19, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support The deletion in question was good, but it's nothing compared to the work done by CorenSearchBot. Nyttend (talk) 15:26, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thehelpfulone 03:06, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I was very impressed with his thought-full-ness (as in "full of thought") and willingness to collaboratively discuss in the WP:V closure discussions. - jc37 22:04, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Most certainly --Hu12 (talk) 05:47, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Has done important work in various areas of WP including ArbCom. A dedicated contributer.--MrADHD | T@1k? 20:57, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done Moving to Who has shirts (Which is still kinda draft and ugly if anyone has ideas :) ). Will archive nomination in 48 hours or so Jalexander--WMF 02:23, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stuartyeates

Nominated by: LauraHale (talk) 21:06, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
They do a lot of good work regarding New Zealand in terms of article creation and currating. They also reach out to people in the NZ community to keep them up to date with what's going on. --LauraHale (talk) 21:06, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support

Support. I've come across Stuart with some articles and AfDs. He's always polite and always works incredibly hard.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 11:01, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done Moving to Who has shirts (Which is still kinda draft and ugly if anyone has ideas :) ). Will archive nomination in 48 hours or so Jalexander--WMF 02:23, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SatuSuro

Nominated by: LauraHale (talk) 21:08, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
SatuSuro does a lot of good work related to Western Australia and assists in creating collaborative opportunities for the community located there.--LauraHale (talk) 21:08, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support

Not to forget his Indonesian work. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:24, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Per what Laura has stated, He has also done a great job with photography in Australia and overseas. Bidgee (talk) 05:52, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It was he who took the time to welcome me when I was just getting started, so I'm prejudiced. Deor (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
long term contributor, Gnan garra 13:12, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done Moving to Who has shirts (Which is still kinda draft and ugly if anyone has ideas :) ). Will archive nomination in 48 hours or so Jalexander--WMF 02:23, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Newyorkbrad

Nominated by: Anonymous User

Why is this user awesome?
Despite all of the criticism that ArbCom has taken, Brad has remained highly respected and definitely should get a t-shirt.

Support
Submitted through the google doc by a user who wishes to remain anonymous! Jalexander--WMF 19:03, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - It's NYB! : ) - jc37 20:27, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes Definitely! AutomaticStrikeout 22:54, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
--Andreas JN466 02:03, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yup. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 02:25, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nikkimaria (talk) 12:46, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
We may as well split our stock room of t-shirts between NYB, Dennis, and Worm. I said if Worm was 1, Dennis was 1A, so I suppose NYB is 1B. Go Phightins! 19:42, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Very true. --Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 00:34, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I look forward to see him wearing swag. :-) — Coren ^(talk) 15:29, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Arbitrators come and they go, I agree with them and disagree with them, but Brad is almost invariably (putting aside those exceptions which prove the rule) a voice of reason. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:23, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with BMK. LadyofShalott 23:55, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fully qualified candidate. Begoon ^talk 02:24, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Deserves it. Λυδ α cιτγ 02:47, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No question. Wizardman 03:24, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Wise. Not everyone gets that, but that's always been the way with wisdom. --Dweller (talk) 18:20, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
We don't always agree, or indeed ever agree, but he deserves a shirt for his efforts. Malleus Fatuorum 03:06, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely --Hu12 (talk) 05:47, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This makes the second time I've supported you this week. Even when I disagree, I respect the logic and thought process that goes into the decision. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 23:40, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've admired Brad from afar for quite a while. I was quite surprised when our first interaction wound up with him pissing me off in a major way. But hell yeah, he deserves a shirt! Joefromrandb (talk) 04:24, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Among my first serious dealing on wikipedia were with NYB. He handled it with class, and still does. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:^simple/_complex 11:53, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A very committed editor. Does lots of very important work in dispute resolution via the ArbCom.--MrADHD | T@1k? 20:49, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Really, if anyone deserves something like this, Newyorkbrad does. 28bytes (talk) 23:11, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Always clearly expresses his thoughts. You may disagree with him, but he won't mind. A Statesman. ```Buster Seven Talk 00:03, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done Moving to Who has shirts (Which is still kinda draft and ugly if anyone has ideas :) ). Will archive nomination in 48 hours or so Jalexander--WMF 02:23, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nyttend

Nominated by: • Sbmeirow • Talk • 21:18, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this user awesome?
Very helpful and fair. Always aware of numerous policies and guidelines.

Support

Definitely! Nyttend is always helpful and extremely knowledgeable. Legoktm (talk) 22:53, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:05, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Anthonyhcole (talk) 19:50, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Smallbones_(smalltalk) 17:56, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Of course! --Tito Dutta (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely --Hu12 (talk) 05:47, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done Moving to Who has shirts (Which is still kinda draft and ugly if anyone has ideas :) ). Will archive nomination in 48 hours or so Jalexander--WMF 02:23, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DGG

Nominated by: Anonymous User

Why is this user awesome?
For his "tough, but fair" approach to substandard articles in AfC, AfD, and elsewhere. He is not easily fooled by unreliable sources or PR-speak, but if an article has potential, he often gives detailed advice that, if implemented, will almost always result in an article of acceptable quality.

Support
Submitted through the google doc by a user who wishes to remain anonymous! Jalexander--WMF 01:27, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, spot on. I used to think DGG to be too much of an inclusionist but his rational arguments, and the consistency of them across a broad range of subjects, has caused me to learn much about what really is and is not reasonably warranted here, and what level of discussion (CSD, PROD, AFD) is most appropriate for a given subject. I still do not always agree but he is a Top Man and I admire his efforts enormously. - Sitush (talk) 01:34, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't expect to voice another opinion, but I have considered DGG a mentor even when he didn't know he was. No other person at Wikipedia has been as influential in my Wikilife. I would happily buy him a dozen t-shirts for the wisdom, kindness, and even the occasional stern admonishments that he has given me over the years. Surely I can't be the only one that has benefited so much from DGG. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 01:48, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely. Go Phightins! 03:20, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely. DGG provided me with some great advice on CSD/PROD tagging which have definitely improved my skills. Legoktm (talk) 03:59, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Needs a dewey classification. :) Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:05, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
DGG is the exemplar of a Wikipedian. Hiding T 15:32, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Anyone that helped Dennis become the editor that he is today should get a t-shirt. AutomaticStrikeout 18:20, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
His talk page should be compulsory reading - one of the longest there is, but also the one with the most wisdom and useful advice. JohnCD (talk) 19:51, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
--Andreas JN466 02:02, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Of course. --Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 00:35, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Without a doubt. DGG's approach to a a few policy matters is different than mine, which occasionally has put us on opposite sides of various questions, but I've nothing but the highest respect for his work, his goals, and his collegiality. --j⚛e decker ^talk 16:18, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support, absolutely. One of the best and most constructive editors around. --Cyclopia ^talk 20:29, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Clearly one of our best. Hobit (talk) 20:42, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. LadyofShalott 23:43, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Begoon ^talk 02:24, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
DGG should get a shirt, a hat, and an honorary title. He truly is the master. Drmies (talk) 16:24, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I echo all the above, and add that he's a really great person to talk with in real life too. One would be hard-pressed to find someone better. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 18:04, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I would bet that Mrs. DGG could hold up her own in conversation as well. Drmies (talk) 15:16, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
We don't always agree, but he would seem to clearly have the project's best interests at heart. - jc37 22:04, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely. Like a number of others above, I don't agree with DGG all the time. But he has such a sound, "principled" approach to expansion of coverage of our encyclopedia, and such a pleasant and intelligent way of expressing his opinions, that his comments are always valuable. I think he does both an outstanding job of helping new editors when they deserve it, and telling those who don't belong (who are here for some reason other than building an online free encyclopedia) to find another venue. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:05, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
DGG does amazing work rescuing articles and certainly deserves the T shirt Ϣere SpielChequers 22:09, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support, as DGG is without doubt a gentleman and master of the Wiki. — sparklism ^hey! 14:29, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Most certainly --Hu12 (talk) 05:47, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, one of the best of editors, prepared to explain things clearly to all who need. PamD 16:28, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I likes me an editor who makes hard decisions. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:^simple/_complex 11:51, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Total support. I was actually thinking of nominating him myself, but I see I'm not the only person who thinks he does an excellent job!Tokyogirl79 (talk) 10:14, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
One of the best admins we ever had. Secret ^account 07:24, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
DGG....Dat Good Guy. ```Buster Seven Talk 06:38, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done Moving to Who has shirts (Which is still kinda draft and ugly if anyone has ideas :) ). Will archive nomination in 48 hours or so Jalexander--WMF 02:23, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]