User talk:Hu12
Add topic151,042 / /matrix
| Archives |
|---|
| /Archive |
| If I start a conversation on your talk page, I'm watching it. Please leave responses on your talk page. Thanks. |
Welcome
[edit]Welcome to the talk page --Hu12 21:34, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Adsense related
[edit]Hi, the user involved in placing the adsense related sites I blacklisted (per your request, which I fully supported) has requested delisting. He says he was not aware of the external links policies on the various wikipedia projects and offers to clean up (which has already been done by you). He appears to have been acting in good faith (although warned in november 2008) and he appears to be very knowledgeable. I do not think he should use his own links as a reference, but could you have a look Talk:Spam_blacklist#genetherapynet.com_etc? EdBever 20:46, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
Admin?
[edit]Hi Hu12. Ever thought of requesting admin rights to edit the spam blacklist yourself? Regards, Trijnsteltalk 21:01, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Trijnstel. Thanks for the suggestion. I should take the plunge..Cheers;)--Hu12 (talk) 21:54, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
--Joan quidlat (talk) 05:28, 3 December 2014 (UTC)== Replied ==
[1]. πr2 (t • c) 03:32, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Please correct wrong Spamblaclist entries "klassik-resampled.de" and "s-fahl.de".
[edit]The only reason you namend for those entries was the number of links to this site, ignoring totally any qualitative relation of the certain link to this site. Since klassik-resampled contains for instance more than thousand totally uncomercial recordings of 100 different historical composers with hours of never before and no where else recorded Compositions of less known composers. It is no wonder if a site like that could contribute a lot to many Wikiarticles about those composers. And since it is music, the content is totally independent of any language indeed still useful in many different language versions and in so far no spam at all no matter how much articles could be enriched with it. Most of the links you "deleted" without any regard of their quality has been approved in all those different language versions for years!!! The complete action agains all uncommercial Content on "klassik-resampled.de" / "s-fahl.de" still appeares to have been a completely blind action without any real founded reason. So please be so kind and correct this big mistake and remove "klassik-resampled.de" aswell as "s-fahl.de" from the blacklist.--Fahl5 (talk) 17:51, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- Hi!
- fyi, Hu12: I asked at w:de:Portal_Diskussion:Klassische_Musik#externe_links_zu_fahl for opinions about these domains. -- seth (talk) 22:01, 25 September 2013 (UTC)