Jump to content

MediaWiki talk:XTools-AutoEdits.json/Archive 1

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

RenommageCategorie on fr.wikipedia.org

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Florian COLLIN (talk) 20:43, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, I wanted to propose this, too. Per fr:Spécial:Balises, there are over 800 thousand edits with the RenommageCategorie edit tag. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:28, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 11:51, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

BandeauxPortails

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:51, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 11:52, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

BandeauxEbauches

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:51, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 11:52, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

easy peer review on en.wikinews.org

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

This has two descriptions, the "via EzPR" one and the "(Using easy peer review)" one. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:15, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 15:54, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

RedWarn extension

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

The RedWarn regex in the enwiki configuration should be adjusted per w:Special:Diff/1010640916/w:Special:Diff/1011320713/etc. 

\[\[(WP|Wikipedia):REDWARN\|\(RedWarn|\[\[W:en:WP:RW\|\(RW

should be replaced by 

\[\[(WP|Wikipedia):REDWARN\|\(RedWarn|\[\[W:en:(WP:RW|Wikipedia:RedWarn)\|\(RW

to account for a "W:en:Wikipedia:RedWarn" link as shown in the linked edits. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 09:36, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Per Special:Permalink/1023287984#Tag not always applied, this is unlikely to change in the near future, so I am implementing this. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:51, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:21, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Twinkle@mswiki

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

Posting here for transparency. Checked all 14 mswiki sysops; nine of them have used the gadget and seven have a decent number of edits with it.

Now adding to config. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:53, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Similarly for trwiki; out of 24 admins, 23 have used the gadget.
~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 15:34, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:17, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Request to add JWB to the tool

Latest comment: 3 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion
  • Wiki: en.wikipedia.org
  • Name of tool: JavaScript Wiki Browser
  • Links to example edits: [6]
  • Link to the tool's documentation or homepage: en:WP:JWB

CX Zoom (talk) 17:47, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

JWB is pretty much the same as AWB in functionality, and also leaves a "(via WP:JWB)" in edit summary. CX Zoom (talk) 17:47, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
@CX Zoom Already done though? ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 17:58, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
@1234qwer1234qwer4: Sorry, but I don't find JWB here, hence the request. CX Zoom (talk) 18:04, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
That's because you are only analysing mainspace edits. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:06, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
@1234qwer1234qwer4: You are right. My bad, my only JWB edit was in Template namespace, and this link is for Main namespace. I apologise for this redundant request. Thank you and cheers! CX Zoom (talk) 18:08, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:32, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Request to add typo.js to AutoEdits

Latest comment: 3 years ago13 comments4 people in discussion
  • Wiki: en.wikipedia.org
  • Name of tool: User:Uziel302/typo.js
  • Links to example edits:
  • Link to the tool's documentation or homepage: en:WP:CTIOC

Qwerfjkl (talk) 10:36, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

@Qwerfjkl Thanks. As far as I can see, the script doesn't really leave any traces in the edit summary on the CTIOC page, so are you okay with just adding a regexp for - \[\[Wikipedia:Correct typos in one click\|Fix a typo in one click restricted to mainspace (for efficiency)? ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:27, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
@1234qwer1234qwer4: I would presume that almost all edits in the CTIOC page (and it's subpages) would be made via the script, except for Uziel302 adding in more possible typos after the pages are finished. — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Qwerfjkl (talk) 17:35, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
We don't currently have a way to count edits depending on a page (in a way, this might be plausible, since tools only affecting one page usually don't do a high volume of edits). ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 17:41, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
@1234qwer1234qwer4 Looking at the histiry, all the edits seem to be:
  • X in [[Y]] was dismissed
  • X->Y fixed!
  • X was not found in [[Y]]
Qwerfjkl (talk) 10:42, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
The summaries are pretty generic, and we don't have a way to look for regexp A in namespace a and regexp B in namespace b, unfortunately. @MusikAnimal Any thoughts on this? ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 10:52, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Yes, this would be tricky to get right. I suggest asking Uziel302 to add some unique identifier to the edit summaries. A common way to do this to add i.e. (using [[WP:CTIOC|CTIOC]]) to end. This also helps advertise your script to other editors. — MusikAnimal talk 16:25, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
@MusikAnimal This is already done in summaries of the edits in mainspace (as said above), and whoever is looking up edits on the WP:CTIOC page will already know what this is about, so I do get why this isn't done there from an "advertising" point of view. I think implementing the regexp I suggested above would do for now as long as the script is left unchanged, and it will catch at least part of the edits made by the tool. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:17, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
User:1234qwer1234qwer4, Qwerfjkl, I don't know what AutoEdits are, I can add anything you want to summaries in the project pages, but it would be helpful to know why. Uziel302 (talk) 07:55, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
@Uziel302 This is an example; it counts automated edits. Qwerfjkl (talk) 20:10, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
@1234qwer1234qwer4 Sorry for the late reply! I think going off of \[\[Wikipedia:Correct typos in one click\|Fix a typo in one click should be fine. A quick search suggests the script has somewhat widespread use. — MusikAnimal talk 05:27, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
For now, I've added my proposed regexp to catch the edits in mainspace. If there is any change about the edit summaries on the WP:CTIOC page, please let me know. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:49, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:50, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

VFC

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, I have performed a bunch of edits with VFC, but Xtools omit all of them. Would you mind adding the File namespace for Commons? Thanks in advance. Unnamed UserName me 07:30, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

As in the section just above, you were only analysing mainspace edits. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 09:15, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:50, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Request to add Convenient Discussions

Latest comment: 2 years ago7 comments4 people in discussion
  • Wiki:
  • Name of tool: Convenient Discussions
  • Links to example edits:

[11:11, 24 August 2021 | 1040400518]
[08:03, 24 August 2021 | 1040380828]
[07:56, 24 August 2021 | 1040380075]
This edit - [7]

  • Link to the tool's documentation or homepage:

c:User:Jack who built the house/Convenient Discussions Qwerfjkl (talk) 20:07, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

@Qwerfjkl I had this idea a long time ago already, but then questioned how much worth there is in adding more discussion-aiding tools, given that DiscussionTools is getting popular as well. As far as I can tell, the only similar tool we currently analyse for is reply-link (which is local to enwiki), and that appears to have an outdated regexp as well. As with that tool, we would use contribs = true for each of these, so it is not an actually automated tool anyway, and implementing both (as global tools) might significantly affect performance. Maybe @MusikAnimal has any comments on this one as well? ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:19, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Hmm yeah I could go either way. If usage is widespread I'm sure it's probably fine to add, since the regex isn't too complex. If CD were to ever use a tag, then we shouldn't hesitate to add that at least, as tags are efficient to query. In either case, do remember to use the "talk_namespaces": true option, assuming it makes sense here. — MusikAnimal talk 05:23, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
@MusikAnimal, CD is already using a tag where it exists (ruwiki and Commons; I've also created a tag here on Meta per the developer's request, though the configuration is yet to be updated). The "talk_namespaces" parameter will probably be true in most cases, though of course some discussions can also happen in project space. Maybe @Jack who built the house has an opinion on how useful adding this tool to XTools would be? ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:33, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
As far as I could understand the purpose of this tool, it shows a list and stats of edits for a given user distributed by tool. I don't see how this could help me as a maintainer of CD, I guess it's more of a question to users how this could help them. Jack who built the house (talk) 18:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Since there does not seem to be an apparent need, Not done. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:31, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:31, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Shortdesc helper (enWiki)

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Primefac (talk) 12:32, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Fixed. I wonder whether the tag was renamed or I had just misspelt it initially. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 12:35, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:48, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Scope?

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I've recently added a Commons user script to the configuration, and while that was pretty clearly useful for the tool, having almost 200 imports, I'm not sure if two other user scripts (that I am using) are widespread enough to warrant an addition. I am talking about:

@MusikAnimal, what do you think about these? ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 12:01, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

@1234qwer1234qwer4 If they are used a lot (even if it's just limited to small group of users), I don't see any issue with adding them. There was a time when we had to be really careful about keeping the AutoEdits config concise, for performance reasons. However since the new replicas were deployed, I've noticed few if any timeouts. I doubt adding these two would slow it down noticeably. However obviously we can't include every user script ever created, so the line must be drawn somewhere. I trust your judgement :) — MusikAnimal talk 21:32, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

commons:User:Sarang/cleanup.js

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Might it be possible to add that JS to the semi-automated edits? I think that it will be useful. -- sarang♥사랑 06:31, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

申请将Gadget-afchelper.js加入自动编辑

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

--Yining Chen (Talk) 11:08, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

@Yining Chen Thanks and sorry for not responding earlier. Looking at intitle:"common.js"?ns2=1 this search, the script is widespread enough to warrant addition; I am going to take a look at this within the next couple days. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:36, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Excuse me. Have it been completed? --Yining Chen (Talk) 08:10, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

The word "внаслідок" in the Ukrainian language

Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Ян Альбертович Дененберг (talk) 20:33, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

(non-administrator comment) @Ян Альбертович Дененберг: Sorry, but I don't understand. Can you specify what you are requesting for, please? NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 20:39, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
Насколько я понимаю, это малая правка, выполняемая массово, но вручную. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:13, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:28, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

“Marked for translation” edits

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
  • Wiki: meta.wikimedia.org
  • Tool name: “Mark for translation”, with Translate extension (Special:PageTranslation?do=mark)
  • Liens vers des exemples de diff: [11] [12] [13]
  • Tool pages: extension overview, help page

--Pols12 (talk) 19:22, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

@Pols12 See phab:T226230. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:12, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

AFCRHS @ enwiki

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

It also edits namespace 1. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 08:44, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Thanks. There appears to be a bug which causes the namespace restriction to be ignored unless you perform the edits analysis specifically in one of the namespaces not listed, though. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 17:52, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
I fixed the configuration in the meantime; see also User talk:MusikAnimal/Archive 1#Namespace restriction ignored in autoedits-contributions?. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:31, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

sirwan.akrawi

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion

i do like to be one of members in wikipedia to share the my business here Sirwan.akrawi (talk) 20:43, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, but this is not what Wikipedia is for. Besides, this page is not related to your request. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:46, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:49, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Bnwiki Twinkle

Latest comment: 1 year ago5 comments2 people in discussion

twinkle tags are added to all Twinkle edits. I request to add this tool. —MdsShakil (talk) 17:50, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

@MdsShakil, done. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:11, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
Thanks 1234qwer1234qwer4 :) —MdsShakil (talk) 22:02, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
@MdsShakil, another one. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:11, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:40, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Don't show RW and TW edit in Undo

Latest comment: 1 year ago9 comments4 people in discussion

A lot of the items on my list of Undo edits are from RedWarn. I think edits from RW should be removed from Undo, as they weren't made using the Undo tool. Aaron Liu (talk) 22:20, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

@Aaron Liu: The edits from RedWarn and Twinkle on enwiki do indirectly use the undo tool, though, even if it wasn't directly. SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 11:36, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
But the user didn't use the undo tool, another semiautomated tool did, so these shouldn't be the user's edits under the undo tool. Aaron Liu (talk) 14:02, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
Yeah, my point is the semiautomated tool uses the undo tool, which is why MediaWiki tags those edits as "Undos". SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 21:42, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Well could they be excluded to offer a better representation of semi-automated edits? Aaron Liu (talk) 01:21, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
I tried adding the RedWarn tag into the exclusion list for undo, but it doesn't seem to change anything: https://xtools.wmcloud.org/autoedits/en.wikipedia.org/Aaron%20Liu?usesandbox=1 vs https://xtools.wmcloud.org/autoedits/en.wikipedia.org/Aaron%20Liu. @MusikAnimal, any idea? ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:04, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
@1234qwer1234qwer4 There's a chance I broke the sandbox functionality in XTools 3.17.0 which was a major refactor. I swear I tested it though! Did Special:Diff/25161815 work as expected using the sandbox? — MusikAnimal talk 21:24, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
Yes, it did. I assume it's an issue with the tag exclusion functionality. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:27, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
I will look into it. Would you mind filing a Phab task? Thanks! — MusikAnimal talk 22:49, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Requesting addition of RefRenamer to xtools.wmcloud.org/autoedits

Latest comment: 4 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Thank you!

Cl3phact0 (talk) 16:36, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

@Cl3phact0, Done Per a quick search, this does seem to be quite extensively used, so this is added now, thank you! ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 01:32, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:53, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Add Checkty as a semi-automated tool on hewiki

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Checkty is an editing tool widely used on the Hebrew Wikipedia. It allows users to make automated edits like the removal of trailing whitespaces, fixing common grammar mistakes, assuring consistency in the placement of punctuation marks relative to adjacent references, etc.

It is the second-most popular gadget on the Hebrew Wikipedia. Having been around since 2009, edits made using Checkty are automatically marked with the צ'קטי tag since August 2015. Since that time, more than 300 thousand edits have been made with this gadget.

Checkty is a very useful tool. However, due to its simplicity and easiness to use, it frequently has the effect of making dozens (sometimes hundreds) of consecutive bot-like edits. While not a completely automatic tool, it often requires very little, if any, manual intervention by the editor. Many of the Hebrew Wikipedia editors with the largest number of edits have made a significant portion of their edits with Checkty, and it would therefore be very useful and informative to have this data included on XTools' AutoEdits interface.

As mentioned, all edits made with this gadget are tagged, so you can easily access the list of recent changes made with it.

Thanks, Guycn2 (talk) 22:18, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

PAWS new oauth

Latest comment: 3 months ago5 comments2 people in discussion
  • Wiki: all
  • Nom de l’outil: PAWS
  • Liens vers des exemples de diff: [14]

Thanks Framawiki (talk) 17:46, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

@Framawiki, added along with another tag that has been heavily used according to Special:Tags on Commons and Wikidata and somewhat on enwiki.
On another note, I can't seem to find the "OAuth CID: 905" and "OAuth CID: 919" tags anywhere, at least on those three wikis and Meta. (The very first one, "OAuth CID: 351", appears to have been barely used, but there are at least some edits with it.) Since the initial list of tags appears to originate from a comment by @AntiCompositeNumber, could I have some clarification on these? Right now these two seem a bit like clutter that's eating system resources (particularly since this is a "global" tool, being checked on every wiki). ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:58, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
@1234qwer1234qwer4. Thanks. As far I know, when developer of an app using oauth needs to update its app to change the rights requested on the behalf of the user, he needs to create a new version. New oauth customer version creates a new tag ID, and the previous one is no longer used from now. Ie phab:T338023 created a new oauth customer, so all paws edits done from this time are using the new tag ID. Framawiki (talk) 22:24, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
I've gone ahead and removed the two tags I assumed were unused, as I don't see any need in checking all edits against them. cc @Chicocvenancio, who might know if they have ever been used (though it's most likely not worth readding it if it's only a small number). ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 03:19, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:14, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

Recognizing OpenRefine version 3.7?

Latest comment: 3 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Edits by OpenRefine on PAWS, currently in version 3.7, are not recognized by XTools as (semi-)automated. Is it possible to update the configuration, please? I believe the tool is widely used and its statistics are relevant. Example of such edit: [15] PKalnai (talk) 22:11, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

@PKalnai Done, added 3.6, 3.7 and 3.8, thanks! ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 00:37, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:15, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

Add Wikiplus to English Wikipedia

Latest comment: 3 months ago4 comments2 people in discussion

The Master of Hedgehogs (talk) 17:47, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

@The Master of Hedgehogs, should this really be considered an automated tool? It seems like this is similar to w:User:BrandonXLF/QuickEdit and similar (though that leaves nothing in the edit summary), just slightly simplifying regular edits. While we can add a contribs = true parameter to count them as a tool but discount them for the semi-automatic edit count, I don't quite see the necessity unless this is needed for some sort of tracking purposes. See a similar discussion at MediaWiki talk:XTools-AutoEdits.json/Archive 1#Request to add Convenient Discussions. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 00:47, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Yeah that makes sense The Master of Hedgehogs (talk) 19:03, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:15, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

Tracking of moreIdentifiers for Wikidata?

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This is a (customizable) script that can import missing external identifiers from VIAF to Wikidata. The statistics of usage can be checked here:Wikidata:Database reports/Gadget usage statistics/wikidata PKalnai (talk) 17:55, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Tool addition request (AntiVandal)

Latest comment: 1 year ago6 comments5 people in discussion
  • Wiki: en.wikipedia.org
  • Name of tool: AntiVandal
  • Links to example edits: [16][17]
  • Link to the tool's documentation or homepage: Wikipedia:AntiVandal

Zippybonzo (talk) 07:57, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Support as they currently just get added to Generic Rollback it would be great to see the AV edits counted separately. 1AmNobody24 (talk) 07:45, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
@User:1234qwer1234qwer4 Got time to take a look at this? Thanks 1AmNobody24 (talk) 07:53, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
Support - sorry I didn't see this when I made my request The void century (talk) 18:51, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki_talk:XTools-AutoEdits.json/Archive_1&oldid=27951429"