Interwiki synchronization/Apple vs. Malus domesticus
The interwiki links in hsb:Jabłuko and hsb:Zahrodna jabłučina were mixed, although the first one has the topic apple (like a fruit, not a species) and the second one has the topic Malus domestica (a species). Yesterday I manually repaired this in the upper Sorbian articles only.
I found three groups.
Group 1
[edit]They are in hsb:Jabłuko (the fruit of trees in Malus genus).
- cs:Jablko
- da:Æble
- el:Μήλο
- es:Manzana
- et:Õun
- eu:Sagar
- fr:Pomme
- gd:Ubhal (I am not sure, if this is correct here. --Tlustulimu 17:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC))
- hak:Phìn-kó (I am not sure, if this is correct here. --Tlustulimu 17:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC))
- ia:Pomo
- ksh:Appel (för ze esse)
- la:Malum
- lb:Apel
- lt:Obuolys (maistas)
- lv:Ābols
- mg:Paoma
- oc:Poma
- ru:Яблоко
- sco:Aiple
- sk:Jablko
- sl:Jabolko
- sw:Tofaa
- uk:Яблуко
- wa:Pemî
I removed all interwiki links, which now are in the second group and have to be in third group and not had to be corrected in the second group.
Subgroup 1.1
[edit]A wider botanical concept of a type of fruit (i.e. the fruit of Apple tree, pear, etc.)
Group 2
[edit]They are in hsb:Zahrodna jabłučina (the species Malus domestica)
- ar:تفاح (I can not read the letters, and that's why don't know its topic. The article don't have a taxobox. --Tlustulimu 17:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC) The article is about en:Apple. --Meno25 19:06, 28 March 2009 (UTC))
- as:আপেল (I can not read the letters, and that's why don't know its topic. The article don't have a taxobox. --Tlustulimu 17:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC))
- ast:Malus domestica
- az:Alma
- bat-smg:Vuobelis
- bg:Ябълка
- bn:আপেল
- bs:Jabuka
- ca:Pomera
- cv:Панулми
- cy:Afal
- da:Almindelig Æble
- de:Kulturapfel
- en:Apple
- eo:Pomo
- es:Malus domestica
- et:Õunapuu
- eu:Sagarrondo
- fa:سیب
- fi:Tarhaomenapuu
- fr:Pommier domestique
- fur:Miluçâr (I am not sure, if this is correct here. --Tlustulimu 17:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC))
- gl:Maceira
- hak:Phìn-kó (I am not sure, if this is correct here. --Tlustulimu 17:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC))
- hi:सेब (I can not read the letters, and that's why don't know its topic. The article don't have a taxobox. --Tlustulimu 17:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC))
- hr:Jabuka
- ht:Pòm
- hu:Alma
- id:Apel
- is:Epli
- it:Malus domestica
- ja:リンゴ (I am not sure, if this is correct here. I found in the article the science name Malus pumila. Thus, it could be a fourth group. --Tlustulimu 17:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC))
- jv:Apel
- kk:Алма
- ko:사과
- ku:Sêv
- ml:ആപ്പിള്
- ms:Epal
- nn:Eple
- pt:Maçã
- ru:Яблоня домашняя
- qu:Mansana
- simple:Apple
- sk:Jabloň domáca
- sl:Jablana
- sr:Домаћа јабука
- sv:Äpple
- ta:ஆப்பிள்
- th:แอปเปิล
- tr:Elma
- uk:Яблуня домашня
- vec:Malus domestica
- vi:Táo tây
- yi:עפל
- zh:苹果
- zh-min-nan:Phōng-kó
- zh-yue:蘋果 (I am not sure, if this is correct here, because the article has not an taxobox. --Tlustulimu 17:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC))
I removed some interwiki links, which was in it and has to be in the first group:
- cs, el, ksh, la, lb, lv, lt, mg, oc, ru, sco
I corrected some interwiki links, whose old ones are now in the first group:
- da da:Æble (frugt) into da:Almindelig Æble
- es es:Manzana into es:Malus domestica
- et et:Õun into et:Õunapuu
- eu eu:Sagar into eu:Sagarrondo
- fr fr:Pomme into fr:Pommier domestique
- sk sk:Jablko into sk:Jabloň domáca
- sl sl:Jabolko into sl:Jablana
And I removed some interwiki links, which has to be in the third group. I corrected one link only.
- sr sr:Јабука into sr:Домаћа јабука
Group 3
[edit]Some interwiki links where in both pages, but they have to be in the page hsb:Jabłučina, because its topic is the genus Maluṡ. But I am not added them there yet.
- he he:תפוח
- nah nah:Mazatexocotl
- nds-nl nds-nl:Appel (vruch)
- nl nl:Appel (vrucht)
- no no:Epler
- sr sr:Јабука
- uk uk:Яблуня
- ru ru:Яблоня
- en en:Malus
Discussion
[edit]I only corrected the articles hsb:Jabłuko and hsb:Zahrodna jabłučina in the upper Sorbian wikipedia and the Uppersorbian interwiki in de:Kulturapfel (an article about the fruit is not there). I hope, that anybody can help to correct this muddle. Greetings --Tlustulimu 17:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Conclusion
[edit]<rishabh>