Grants:IdeaLab/Towards a New Wikimania/Outcomes/zh

邁向全新的維基媒體國際會議

成果

摘要

從2015年12月15日到2016年1月19日，維基媒體基金會的社群資源團隊舉辦了諮詢案，試圖聚焦對維基媒體運動中各類實體會議的價值、國際維基媒體年會的特殊性、以及未來設計新型態的國際維基媒體年會能夠更好的服務運動。從超過上百位參與者收集而來的回饋（來自公開維基頁或是私人回傳的問卷），結果是：

1. 國際維基年會的價值，在於提供獨一無二的機會讓全球的運動參與者能夠面對面互動，讓來自不同於我們本身背景、觀點、或經驗的人們能夠彼此提問、聆聽、與學習。
2. 維基媒體運動各類實體會議的價值，大體是在於這類會議能提供機會讓我們彼此的關係得以加強加深，透過合作、經驗分享、以及討論來處理複雜的議題。
3. 參與者們支持實驗看看新型的維基媒體會議計畫流程：
   • 國際維基年會將會兩年舉行一次（從2018年開始將會是第一個無維基年會的年度），
   • 若某年不舉辦國際維基年會，那麼當年的地區性或主題性的會議將會得到更多支援。
   • 建立不同會議之間的連結將會變得越來越重要，以更加提升這些會議已經獲得肯認的價值。

諮詢方法與參與者

回饋意見在以下兩處收集：

• Qualtrics: 82 people shared feedback in a private survey on Issue 1 and Issue 2, with some of these individuals (5 participants) only sharing personal stories about movement conferences.
• The discussion page: 37 people shared feedback in public on the same questions for Issue 1 and Issue 2, or brought up additional topics related to Wikimania and movement conferences.

Identical questions on both issues (Questions on Issue 1, Questions on Issue 2) were presented on both Qualtrics and the discussion page.

We reviewed a total of 119 responses. About 90 participants responded to the direct questions found on either the survey or the discussion page. There were a small number of individuals who participated in both channels, but after reviewing feedback, but this was unlikely to be significant.

Ensuring there were multiple channels for feedback, including an option for private feedback, was useful for participation. This methodology for gathering feedback has also worked well in past consultations that affect Wikimedia project contributors generally.

Additional information on sampling and analysis
The following groups were sampled to participate in the survey: Individuals who attended or had expressed interest in attending Wikimania 2015 and Wikimania 2014 Past attendees of regional and thematic conferences including WikiArabia, Wikimedia CEE Meeting, Iberoconf, Wiki Indaba, Wikisource Conference, and GLAM Wiki 2015 Various mailing lists, including wikimedia-l and wikimania-l Wikimania Steering Committee We qualitatively coded responses from all response channels (survey and IdeaLab) together in order to identify the most relevant types of information as well as themes or topics that were frequently brought up. We used codes to: group quotes about the most frequently identified themes, and then look at how many times each theme came up. identify instances of agreement/disagreement with values of Wikimedia conferences in addition to new values and unique values for Wikimania. identify instances of support and concerns for the options for Wikimania planning, in addition to identifying rationales supporting those attitudes. In this report, we use some numbers to identify how often different themes and types of feedback were found. We do think the numbers are useful to help us understand the aggregated feedback at a high level, but we've used language like "about" to describe frequency since qualitative coding is not an exact science. We had two people coding the responses to get more consistency in how the codes were applied, and to catch inaccuracies. When looking at the discussion page feedback, we grouped comments that came from the same user as one response. We tried our best to limit coding within each comment by not coding related or redundant items. If a similar or same point was brought up on the discussion page several times by the same person, it may have been coded only once.

議題1：建立維基國際年會的共享新價值

維基國際年會的獨特價值

Wikimania provides a unique opportunity for us to engage with the global movement face to face, to ask questions, listen and learn from people who have different backgrounds, perspectives and experiences than ourselves.

Participants indicated that Wikimania has similar outcomes as all movement conferences (collaborations, sharing of experiences, discussion of issues), but 1/3 of respondents also noted that the unique value of Wikimania is it provides an opportunity for attendees to engage with the diverse global movement, in a way that is substantially harder (or perhaps impossible) to do otherwise.

This opportunity leads to conversations and collaborations that cross projects, languages and geographical boundaries, at a scale that could not be achieved simply through regional or thematic conferences alone, and it may also promote more unity across the movement. Those responses have been used to build a unique value statement for Wikimania (above).

Wikimania...has [the] unique value of putting our very diverse community together, with people of different countries (from Global North editors of English Wikipedia to Global South editors of small local wikis), different backgrounds (from tech experts to education and GLAM specialists), different experience and interests etc. There is no way to achieve this in any other way.

— 

Anonymous

At Wikimania in Mexico City I discussed very different subjects, from forming regional groups in my country (something I am interested in as a chapter member) to discussions on global rename policy (something I am interested in as a bureaucrat), including a lot of things from translations to Wikidata. I could have [only] achieved this by attending probably 5 or 6 other conferences otherwise.

— Anonymous

概括而言維基媒體運動各類實體會議的價值

Gathering together and meeting face to face at a movement conference helps to deepen and strengthen our relationships with one another, both within our communities and as a global movement.

We do this by:

1. Collaborating together in new or existing projects and groups (e.g. User Groups, Committees), both at and after the conference.
2. Sharing our experiences and learning from the experience of others.
3. Discussing the issues of every day wiki life, how those issues could be addressed, and sometimes making progress toward resolution.

Most participating community members indicated that the proposed value statement and associated outcomes were consistent with their experience. Less than 10% disagreed with the proposed value statement. A few proposed adjustments, additions or clarifications; these improvements have been incorporated into the updated value statement (above).

• Improvement suggestions: Most common suggestion was that the value statement should emphasize how face to face interactions are the foundation for relationship building at the conference; without these relationships, the primary outcomes – statements #1-3 above – would be less likely to happen.

• Concerns: The most concern or disagreement (about 10%) was expressed around statement #3, previously stated as "Resolving issues, or making progress toward resolving issues". While many recognized the value and importance of discussing issues, most also emphasized the difficulty in actually resolving issues, due to the short timeframe of the conference and the absence of broader community involvement.

Yes, [these values] are generally consistent, although I think these statements apply to small conferences and local meetups more than large international conferences.

— Anonymous

I believe the face-to-face contact at a global event helps tremendously in making an excellent connection that you can refer to in the future when the right circumstances arise.

— Anonymous

議題2：重新思考維基國際年會的整體形式

選項1：改為全球輪流舉辦	選項2：改為舉辦地區性或主題性的會議	選項3：在全球年會以及地區性或主題性的會議之間輪流舉辦
主辦地的選擇	不再競標 Instead, move to global rotational schedule, set 3-4 years out WMF and Steering Committee select location and invite local communities to participate, plans are developed collaboratively with prospective hosts	Stop holding one big Wikimania for everyone Instead, do more Regional / Thematic Conferences each year. Bids are replaced by grants process, where increased Conference Support funding can be made available for communities organizing these. Consider how we can build more connections between these regional/thematic events	每兩年舉辦全球性的維基國際年會 In years without Wikimania, increased funding and logistical support for regional/thematic conferences instead Build more connections between these regional/thematic events
Program Setup	Program Chair is appointed by Steering Committee, taking location into account Program Chair selects Program committee	Programming for regional/thematic conferences decided by local hosts and attendees
旅運支援	Similar to current form.	WMF offers significantly more logistical & event-planning support for regional/thematic conferences

Results

Participants expressed the most support for Option 3, followed by Option 1.

• Analysis of responses showed there were about 55 instances of support (61.1%) for Option 3, and about 47 instances of support (52.2%) for Option 1. There were only 16 instances of support (17.8%) for Option 2.

Participants were most frequently concerned with Option 2.

• There were about 36 instances of explicit concerns (40%) raised about Option 2 , whereas concerns were raised for Option 3 only 9 times (10%), and for Option 1 only 13 times (14.4%).

Concerns and Support for Options

Option 1 (Change to Global Rotation)

One particular issue is "What are the regions we are rotating through?", continents could be considered too broad, and do we work harder to cover less active regions or support more organically growing areas...?

-StuartPrior, from the discussion page.

• Support: People who supported Global Rotation often pointed out that being able to meet year-to-year as a unified movement is valuable, and that this applies to individuals new to the movement in addition to ongoing projects and collaborative efforts.

• Concerns: People who were concerned with Option 1 were not convinced that the existing bidding system was problematic, or desired more information about the details of how global rotation would work in practice. Some also felt that the costs of Wikimania – in terms of finances, time demands, and other resources – are too great.

Option 2 (Change to Regional/Thematic Conferences)

A regional gathering in which many can attend (instead of some selected Wikimedians) will increase by far the collaboration between countries and Wikimedians that speak and edit in the same language.

-Anonymous.

• Support: There was a low level of support for focusing solely on regional and thematic conferences, and few explanations were provided by participants for this preference. One participant noted that for individuals who do not speak English, regional and thematic events are the only opportunity to attend Wikimedia conferences. Another individual felt there were advantages to holding conferences gradually through the year.

• Concerns: Participants overwhelmingly rejected the notion of abandoning Wikimania altogether, as it has unique value independent of regional and thematic conferences.

选项3 (可选)

I rather prefer to vote for the third option: alternate between Wikimania and regional conferences. We must not overlook thematic and regional conferences that would be a kind of pre-conference for the major event, Wikimania.

-Anonymous, translated from French.

• Support: Support for this hybrid approach was based on feedback that more can and should be done to support regional and thematic conferences. Many specifically framed this option as a balanced approach to supporting Wikimedia projects and participants through conferences. Some participants proposed that regional/thematic conferences could serve as useful precursors in preparation for the larger Wikimania conference in the following year.

• Concerns: While there were few concerns with this option, some expressed that working relationships with individuals they are accustomed to seeing at Wikimania would be difficult to maintain if they could only meet every two years. Likewise, it may also be more difficult to initiate and maintain projects and initiatives where meetups at Wikimania are useful.

Other suggestions and concerns

A number of specific suggestions and concerns about the more detailed aspects of Wikimania's organization were also brought up by participants.

This information, summarized below, will be collated in more detail at Wikimania/Consultation suggestions, for handoff to planning committees and future organizers of Wikimania and other conferences.

Comments regarding specific Wikimania considerations and other movement conferences matters
A number of ideas were advanced on the matter of host selection for Wikimania to address the problem that the conference is not accessible to many. They included some measurable suggestions to use for a rotational schedule in addition to a general suggestion to focus on mid-sized locations rather than on very large cities. Also related to accessibility, some participants called for more scholarships for regional/thematic conferences. The increasing number of WMF staff attending the conference, in particular at Wikimania 2015, as well as the proportion of presentations given by WMF Staff, was concerning to some participants. A variety of considerations were offered on programming decisions at Wikimania, such as more focus on issues related to content creation and content curation issues, more opportunities for volunteers to present or discuss their work, and various suggestions on the responsibilities of the program committee. Some participants also suggested holding a training session or facilitating mentorship for Wikimania speakers/presenters to help in preparation. A few participants noted that there is considerable benefit to having a local professional event organizer for Wikimania, and that local teams should be able to choose this organizer.

下一步

Based on the above findings from this consultation, the following next steps are now under consideration:

Timeline for changes

2016年	Wikimania in Esino Lario, as planned. Setup WMF Conference Support systems for improving grants and other resources to regional/thematic event organizers
2017年	Wikimania 2017 in Montreal, as planned. Setup and planning for "option 3" experimentation with community input, including plans to address key concerns identified for this option
2018年	Year of no Wikimania; Increase support and connections for regional and thematic conferences
2019年	Wikimania under experimental rotational model, including any suggestions/revisions from Wikimanias 2016 & 2017

Feedback

Got questions or other thoughts to share about these reported outcomes? Please post them on the discussion page!

References