補助:委員會

This page is a translated version of the page Grants:Committees and the translation is 4% complete.

Outdated translations are marked like this.

區域基金委員會

The primary role of the Regional Fund Committees (RFC, also Regional Funds Committees, Regional Grants Committees) is strategic thought partnership to help understand the complexities of Wikimedia Foundation Funding regions and to make funding decisions for grant applications in the regions, providing knowledge and expertise to applicants to support successful movement activities.

维基媒体基金会资助项目的一个重要方面是志愿者委员会在向申请人提供指导和支持以及决定如何分配流动资金方面所起的作用。根据运动战略建议，我们保留使每个区域的社区和主题专家能够在确定优先事项和为特定类型的倡议分配资金方面发挥核心作用的委员会。这些过程中的每一个都得益于现有的专业知识、新观点以及对当地社区所需技能和环境的认识。

Current members

我們有7個區域委員會來領導我們的參與過程。有關每個區域委員會的更多資訊，請查看相應的區域頁面：

Username	Regional Fund Committee	Term started	Notes
FocalPoint	CEECA	2021年10月
MikyM	CEECA	2021年10月
Reda Kerbouche	CEECA	2021年10月
Красный	CEECA	2021年8月
Nataev	CEECA	2022年2月
Justine.toms	CEECA	2022年6月
Nina1009	CEECA	2023年4月
BKlen-CEEhub	CEECA	2024年5月	non-voting member, CEE Hub
Aotfs2013	ESEAP	2021年8月
Chipmunkdavis	ESEAP	2021年8月
Exec8	ESEAP	2021年8月
Kunokuno	ESEAP	2021年8月
Alphama	ESEAP	2022年10月
22Kartika	ESEAP	2022年9月
GhoziSeptiandri	ESEAP	2022年9月
Kunirasem	ESEAP	2022年9月
taweetham	ESEAP	2022年9月
IvomarDos	LAC	2023年1月
marsebu	LAC	2023年1月
Superzerocool	LAC	2023年1月
Onica aguilar	LAC	2023年9月
PilarSaenz	LAC	2023年9月
Vanett Graneros	LAC	2023年9月
Fjmustak	MEA (MENA)	2021年8月
NANöR	MEA (MENA)	2021年9月
Ibrahim.ID	MEA (MENA)	2023年9月
Nehaoua	MEA (MENA)	2023年9月
Reda benkhadra	MEA (MENA)	2023年9月
Aristidek5maya	MEA (SSA)	2021年8月
Azogbonon	MEA (SSA)	2021年8月
Aimeabibis	MEA (SSA)	2023年9月
capitainAfrika	MEA (SSA)	2023年9月
Dnshitobu	MEA (SSA)	2023年9月
Gilbert Ndihokubwayo	MEA (SSA)	2023年9月
Iwuala Lucy	MEA (SSA)	2023年9月
Pellagia Njau	MEA (SSA)	2023年9月
Effeietsanders	NA	2021年8月
Emjackson42	NA	2021年8月
AbhiSuryawanshi	NA	2021年8月
Matthewvetter	NA	2021年8月
Redwidgeon	NA	2021年8月
Wugapodes	NA	2021年8月
Antiqueight	NWE	2021年8月
mmo	NWE	2021年8月
NickK	NWE	2021年8月
Camelia.boban	NWE	2022年10月
trondtr	NWE	2022年10月
Yger	NWE	2022年10月
Josiefraser	NWE	2023年10月
Abraham Taherivand	NWE	October 2024
Astrid Carlsen	NWE	October 2024
Quelet	NWE	October 2024
Balajijagadesh	SA	2021年8月
medhavigandhi	SA	2021年8月
Nawaraj Ghimire	SA	2021年8月
Tarunno	SA	2021年8月
आर्या जोशी	SA	2023年12月
Nabin K. Sapkota	SA	2024年8月
Ravidreams	SA	2024年8月

Inactive and past committee members

Roles and responsibilities

Contribute and provide feedback on the regional budget distribution across regions – how much goes into each regional budget.
Review proposals and make decisions on the funding amount grantees receive based on proposal evaluation. Committees are responsible for the decision-making process of the General Support Fund. Some committees, based on their capacity, are also involved in the decision-making of the Rapid Fund program.
Support the committee work by sharing knowledge, expertise and regional context with Community Resources and within committees to build needed capacities around resourcing, representation, and power sharing.

Other roles committee members may take:

Offer mentorship to grantees and support to newcomers in Wikimedia Foundation Funds.
Play a role in conflict resolution.
Support the Program Officer in communication with grantees, different movement bodies, and the Wikimedia community. Write Diff posts about projects funded by the committee.
Identifying regional opportunities and challenges and aligning them with the funding decisions.
Make recommendations about funding practices to the Wikimedia Foundation.
Recruitment of other RFC members.

Conference Fund Support Committee

For the Conference Fund program, there is a separate committee consisting of different regional representatives. This committee is engaged in the decision-making process for the Conference Funds proposals and provides support to Conference organizers.

Term and tenure

Committee members commit to a minimum two-year service period and a maximum term limit of four years (with an option to extend if there is a shortage of new or experienced committee members). A rolling membership system is implemented to ensure that some experienced people are always on the committee. An additional two-year extension is possible in case continuity is required.

Selection and expertise

New Regional Fund Committee members are co-selected by the existing Regional Fund Committee and the Community Resources Team.

Selection criteria

Eligible:

Members of the Wikimedia community
Volunteer board members of Wikimedia affiliates. Previous Executive Directors and Board Members of Wikimedia affiliates.
Members of mission-aligned organisations, partner institutions (EDU, Culture and Heritage, gender, etc.)
Individuals working or having expertise in regions of interest

Not eligible:

Anyone receiving compensation as a staff through a Wikimedia affiliate or current General Support Fund, Wikimedia Alliances Fund, or Research Fund grant project. (This excludes grantee partners requesting Rapid Funds, Events and Conference Funds, and Movement Strategy Funds.)
Staff connected to projects funded by the Wikimedia Foundation within allied organisations.
Anyone receiving compensation for a paid role with the Wikimedia Foundation.
Anyone who is not compliant with the behavioral requirements for applicants to our funding programs.

Expertise desired

Understanding of Wikimedia programs, in addition to contributions to the online projects.
Strong ability to contribute and participate effectively in collaborative decision-making.
Effective communication and conflict resolution skills.
Expertise and insights related to the region of the RFC.
Alignment with the values of the 2030 strategic direction and the movement strategy recommendations.
Understanding of or willingness to learn about participatory grantmaking.
A demonstrated commitment to sharing skills and experience, and helping others grow.
Professional and/or volunteer experience and skills related to funds committee review work, such as budget management and application review skills, experience with governance of non-governmental organizations, background in common programmatic areas like culture and heritage, education, etc.
Expertise, including lived experience, related to diversity, equity and inclusion to help promote and support knowledge equity, and the increasing of geographic, gender, or age diversity.

Diversity criteria

Committee members understand and value diversity, including cultural, linguistic, and gender differences. We aim to support Regional Committees that represent and serve the needs of many communities in the movement, including those based on gender, language, ethnicity, age, and geography, amongst other characteristics.

Committee Open Calls

Composition

Size: The size of the committees varies in different funding regions with 5-10 members as of 2024.

Stakeholder Representation: Regional stakeholders can also be involved in some committees. For example, the CEECA Regional Fund Committee has a non voting representative from the CEE Hub. The committees with Community Resources can involve other stakeholders to ensure inclusion and representation.

Deliberations and decision-making

Frequency of deliberations or meetings

Committees communicate through online meetings, mailing lists, and Telegram groups. Some regional committee mailing lists also accept external communication. The work of the committee will vary from month to month. At the beginning, time for training will be required as well as during application review in the two rounds per year. Other moments would require less time focused on communication and mentorship.

Working language

Working language varies across regions. For example, the working language for the North American Committee is English, the Latin American and Caribbean committee works in Spanish, Portuguese, and French with interpretation and translation services, and the ESEAP Committee works in English, Mandarin, Japanese, and Indonesian. If the submitted application is in another language, committees can receive translation support.

Format of review and deliberations

For more details about the review process and review framework used, see: How are General Support Fund proposals reviewed for Wikimedia Community Fund?

Quorum and consensus

Committees use the gradients of the agreement scale for consensus building towards making inclusive funding decisions. Some committees use the 1-2-4-All approach for proposals reviews and deliberations. This means that there are 3-4 stages that an application undergoes that includes proposal review and deliberations. During the deliberations, Program Officers act as facilitators and provide Committees with requested additional information.

Program Officer's role

The Regional Program Officer from the Community Resources team support in administration, documentation, facilitation, coordination, communication, and serves in an advisory role.

Policies and transparency

Committee members are committed to the following policies and principles to support constructive dialogue with applicants and grantees:

Committee decisions and recommendations are published on grant talk pages. After every funding round, Committees have a meeting with their Program Officer to evaluate the completed work and identify areas of improvement.

Inactivity in the committee or not following the eligibility criteria and behavioral expectations can result in removal from the committee.

Committee surveys and feedback

Support and resources

Stipend: The regional committee members may receive a stipend of $100 every 2 months to offset costs of participation. Stipends can be used to pay for childcare, internet, transportation and other costs that make volunteering possible
Skill development opportunities: Training is provided to the committee members to support DEI, review, discussion, and decision-making. Committee members have access to skill building opportunities, including training on topics such as conflict transformation and nonviolent communication. Through their work on the tasks, members also learn by doing.

其他基金委員會

Conference Fund Support Committee