Community Wishlist Survey 2020/Wikisource/XTools Edit Counter for Wikisource

Random proposal ►◄ Wikisource The survey has concluded. Here are the results!

XTools Edit Counter for Wikisource

Français: Compteur de modifications très amélioré.

Problem: There are no wikisource specific stats about user wise Proofread/validation. It is impossible to know stats about proofreading task. Wikisource workflow is different from Wikipedia. It could not be done by xtool. So we need specific Stats tools for Wikisource.
Français: Il n’existe pas de statistiques spécifiques sur les correction/Validations par utilisateurs. Les processus de travail (workflow) de Wikisource diffèrent de ceux de Wikipédia. Ce ne peux être fait via par xtool. Nous avons besoin d’un outil statistique spécifique pour Wikisource.
Who would benefit: Whole Wikisource Community.
Français: Toute la communauté Wikisource.
Proposed solution: Make a stats Tools for Wikisource specific.
Français: Créer un outil de statistiques spécifiques à Wikisource.
More comments:
Phabricator tickets: phab:T173012
Proposer: Jayantanth (talk) 16:01, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

I'm initially a “Support Sure, why not?” on this, but given there is a limited amount of resources available for the Wishlist tasks, and this is both not very important and potentially quite time-consuming to implement, I'm going to abstain from voting for this. It's a nice idea, but not worth the cost. --Xover (talk) 05:56, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @Xover: I totally understand your point as I felt a bit the same way but after rethink, I don't think it's cost that much considering the impact. Better knowing a community can have a very strong effect to boost said community. In particular, I'm thinking about participation contest, who all need stats and could benefit from this edit counter. Cheers, VIGNERON * ^discut. 17:33, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting

Support Bodhisattwa (talk) 06:33, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kaviraf (talk) 16:45, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wargo (talk) 23:07, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Libcub (talk) 08:20, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alan ^Talk 12:43, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Support --Jan.Kamenicek (talk) 10:24, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 10:23, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support *•.¸♡ ℍ𝕒𝕣𝕕𝕒𝕣𝕤𝕙𝕒𝕟 𝔹𝕖𝕟𝕚𝕡𝕒𝕝 ♡¸.•*^{𝕋𝕒𝕝𝕜} 16:52, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sgd. Hasley 16:56, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support JogiAsad (talk) 13:25, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:32, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 15:38, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support 游魂 16:38, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ashok Talk 17:05, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Risker (talk) 05:04, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good idea. Since edit counter doesn't group edits by work, the resulting data is pretty meaningless for Wikisource. Pete Forsyth (talk) 00:00, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support---Avicenno (talk) 10:53, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Geonuch (talk) 11:23, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 14:33, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Harkawal Benipal (talk) 16:07, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support VIGNERON * ^discut. 17:30, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Xtools are always helpful and they should be on Wikisource. Satpal Dandiwal (talk) 21:10, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mahir256 (talk) 07:40, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Gurtej Chauhan (talk) 14:47, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support सुबोध कुलकर्णी (talk) 12:07, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ruthven (msg) 12:35, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Novak Watchmen (talk) 17:54, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]