Community Wishlist Survey 2019/Admins and patrollers/Partial "Pending Changes" Reviewing

Random proposal ►◄ Admins and patrollers The survey has concluded. Here are the results!

Partial "Pending Changes" Reviewing

Problem: Pending Changes protection becomes increasingly unwieldly once more than one editor's changes are pending. If both (at least) one desired post and one undesired post are pending it requires vastly more effort to ensure the article only gains the desired content. This discourages reviewers from handling it, which allows for an even larger edit queue to build up - causing a vicious cycle
Who would benefit: Any Pending Changes reviewer, and editors altering a PC-protected article
Proposed solution: Provide the ability to individually accept or decline non-clashing pending edits.
More comments:
Phabricator tickets:
Proposer: Nosebagbear (talk) 20:13, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

This dovetails really quick into the discussion for T113004. --Izno (talk) 20:52, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Voting

Support PC is increasingly used on moderate and high activity pages and this would make it far more viable in this enviroment - reducing the need for semi-protect Nosebagbear (talk) 19:47, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:35, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wugapodes (talk) 05:47, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kpgjhpjm (talk) 07:35, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 11:07, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hadibe (talk) 22:05, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Keith D (talk) 23:20, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ciao • Bestoernesto • ✉ 06:55, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Newslinger talk 07:55, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Absolutely — multiple pending changes that should have different statuses is a hugely confusing barrier to action. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 11:34, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bruce1ee (talk) 18:11, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support FR30799386 (talk) 07:07, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support The current process inhibits the use of Pending Changes, this solution would reduce the need for Semi-Protection Waddie96 (talk) 07:35, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support ONUnicorn (talk) 16:03, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support One of the biggest pain points in a process with more than its share of pain points. FeRDNYC (talk) 10:08, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Novak Watchmen (talk) 22:57, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Laboramus (talk) 07:20, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~Cybularny ^Speak? 15:42, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Redalert2fan (talk) 12:40, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support DannyS712 (talk) 08:11, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support — AfroThundr ^{(u · t · c)} 01:35, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:14, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support DMacks (talk) 18:47, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Whispering (talk) 21:18, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Denver20 (talk) 15:27, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ldorfman (talk) 20:40, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]