ප්‍රජාව
|
(සිංහල) This is an essay. It expresses the opinions and ideas of some Wikimedians but may not have wide support. This is not policy on Meta, but it may be a policy or guideline on other Wikimedia projects. Feel free to update this page as needed, or use the discussion page to propose major changes. |
මෙම පිටුව ප්‍රජාව ගැනයි. එනම් විකිමීඩියා පරිශීලකයින් අතර විකි ව්‍යාප්‍රුති හරහා සිදුවන අන්තර්ක්‍රියා ගැනයි.
Body risk
කලින් ප්‍රකාශයක් වූයේ විකිපීඩියා එය ශරීර අවදානම බෙදා නොගන්නා නිසා ප්‍රජාවක් නොවන බවයි. අන්වර්ථ නාම සහ IP ලිපින සැබෑ පුද්ගලයින්ට අනුරූප නොවේ; සමහර විට අතථ්‍ය මිනිසුන් මත ප්‍රජාවක් ගොඩනැගිය නොහැක. විකිපීඩියා නොවන ව්‍යාපෘති ද අන්වර්ථ නාම සහ IP ලිපින වලට ඉඩ දෙන බැවින්, ඒවාට ඇත්තේ එකම තත්ත්වයකි.
One idea for Wikipedia is to build a free encyclopedia together through the common goal of building a free encyclopedia. However, a community goes beyond the simple sharing of a simplified vision, and includes common community values. In 2012, English Wikipedia appears to have common values as well: assume good faith, no personal attacks, NPOV disputes, and user talk templates. Wikinews also has those four attributes, but not in the same manner. In not-Wikipedia, not-Wikinews projects, NPOV disputes and user talk templates appear to be much less important.
Perhaps Wikipedia and Wikinews are more like families than communities. One does not choose a family, but belongs to it. However, a family is a cultural idea that varies worldwide, so this paragraph may be incomprehensible to some peoples.
Some users remain bothered by the notion that Wikimedians cannot constitute a community because they do not share body risks. If we only consider those Wikimedians who are humans, we are all part of at least one community: the human community. Right now, we are all sharing the risks of being hurt or killed, by war, AIDS, or by poor atmospheric quality. In biological terms, a community is a group from one species living together and strongly interrelated. Communities cause a mixture of benefits and disadvantages; communities are stable when, over time, both the whole community and the individuals that make it up benefit. Diversity and communality both play roles in community.
විකිපොත් සහ බෙදුම්
Wikibooks is a special case. The project divides itself into multiple, autonomous book projects. English Wikibooks, in particular, is lacking a mechanism to repel new book projects that are outside the scope of Wikibooks, given by a official enforced policy.
Wikisource likes uniformity: a single standard Header template on English Wikisource introduces most texts.
විකිපීඩියා ප්‍රජාවට විකිමීඩියා ප්‍රජව බවට පත්විය හැකිද?
It is already so. For example, we have IRC channel cloaks for different Wikimedia projects, and we also have "wikimedia/" cloaks. At least on Freenode, we can have a Wikimedia community.
මේවත් බලන්න
- The Wikipedia Community
- False community
- IRC channels
- File:2004 WMF Election participation2.png image showing "community"