Wikinews/Licensure Poll/GFDL/Oppose

Deprifry 11:22, 7 September 2005 (UTC) Please don't. Do you want to add 5 pages of licence to every print edition we publish?[reply]
Cspurrier 12:12, 7 September 2005 (UTC) en Would kill the Print Edition and Audio Wikinews.[reply]
McCart42 13:31, 7 September 2005 (UTC) en If we ever hope to be able to distribute Wikinews in print anywhere, we must come up with a solution to the 5-page license information issue. Don't vote for GFDL unless you either don't believe this is a problem or can present some practical solution.[reply]
Datrio 13:44, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
APPER 16:46, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Sblive 17:32, 7 September 2005 (UTC) It's a kind of non-sense! If we want the wikinews content to be republished, we can't force republishers into showing full list of authors etc.[reply]
Aphaia ++ 06:18, 8 September 2005 (UTC) Concur with Cspurrier; GFDL doesn't fit broadcasting.[reply]
Dan100 17:05, 8 September 2005 (UTC) Let's face it, it's rubbish. It's only used by Wikipedia as it was the only thing around at the time.[reply]
Mrmiscellanious 19:30, 8 September 2005 (UTC) I would hardly call this license a "free license". Definitely not the option for Wikinews.[reply]
Schaengel89 @me 18:12, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Kaldari 19:18, 19 September 2005 (UTC). Please no. GFDL is a terrible license for this purpose.[reply]