Jump to content

Wikimedia Incubator/logo/archive

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

After 15 days of voting, the winner of this contest was #4 (Meddie Egg), with 67 votes, compared to 5, 4 and 0 for the others.

The following discussion is an archived debate on the permanent logo of Wikimedia Incubator. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Voting

[edit]

Only vote on the proposal you like (1, 2, 3, or 4). If the winning proposal has more than one variation, a subsequent vote will be held to determine the winning variation. Just vote for what you like. If you must say something about an idea you don't like, add your comments sto the discussions above. The vote is not official, and is just to judge consensus.

Proposal #1 (Eggs)

[edit]

  1. Support Support 555 11:52, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Support --Bertrand GRONDIN 08:18, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Support--Shizhao 16:52, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Support--Steel archer 120:58, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Support--Yrithinnd 01:32, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal #2 (Fallback meta-logo)

[edit]

Proposal #3 (Budding meta-logo)

[edit]

  1. Support Support --Marbot 18:32, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Support – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 06:38, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Support looks futuristic and not too kitsch. 216.165.37.106 03:34, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Support 69.180.128.169 21:48, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal #4 (Meddie Egg)

[edit]

  1. Support Support --Randy Johnston (‽) 06:12, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Support I assume that we will then have a new discussion over whether to have variant 4a or 4b. Daniel (‽) Check out Wikiscope! 11:31, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Support Indech 13:54, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Support. Clearly. —Nightstallion (?) 15:17, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Support Lcarsdata 15:43, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support Support. Obviously. If I hadn't liked Aliters idea most I would've never designed the other versions. NielsF 17:49, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support Support Zanimum 18:43, 30 June 2006 (UTC) Unique imagery, doesn't conflict with Wikimedia's logo policy. Original, a, b all good with me.[reply]
  8. Support Support Gyre 20:53, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support Support Aeetlrsk 21:24, 30 June 2006 (UTC) I like this idea.[reply]
  10. Support Support Ben 14:22, 01 July 2006 (UTC)
  11. Support Support Red Baron 13:39, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support Support Gaudio 18:38, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support Support --Nick1915 19:43, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Support Support Rei-artur 20:10, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Support Support perfect --86.5.110.93 23:27, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support Support Archer7 08:45, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Support Support Looks professional, good. Tangotango 08:49, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Support Support Computerjoe 11:54, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support Support Vildricianus 18:49, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Support Support Jon Harald Søby 19:06, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Support Support Looks good. --Hartz 22:39, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Support Support Gary KIRK parler! 07:58, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Support Support Romihaitza 11:33, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Support with proviso that if Incubator is chosen as name, logo be edited to reflect that (may seem obvious but best to be clear) KillerChihuahua 16:14, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Support Support shaka 16:24, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Support Support --HappyDog 00:56, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Support Support, 4B. Titoxd(?!?) 01:21, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Support Support Feydey 01:25, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Support Support Quiddity 01:39, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Support Support - Trevor macinnis 03:42, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Support Support - B-101 13:27, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Support Support - Zuirdj 16:20, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Support Support - Not user yet:NilColor 20:30, 4 July 2006 (GMT+3)
  34. Support Support --Shizhao 16:54, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Support Support Smurrayinchester 17:41, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Support Support --Iamnotanorange 18:47, 4 July 2006 (UTC) Kinda looks like an embryo cross section with ectoderm, endoderm and mesoderm. Can we work in neural crest tissue?[reply]
    Of course we can. ;) —Nightstallion (?) 06:10, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Support Support Yeah, I'd go for this.Voice of All 06:15, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Support Support - the wub 11:15, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Support Support Someoneinmyheadbutit'snotme 21:24, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Support Support 4b Naconkantari 00:25, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Support Support - The Wikimedia Egg is Watching You ...--Eloquence 23:58, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Support Support --best of the lot. gren 01:21, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Support Support - It looks pretty darn good! AlexNg 05:41, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Support Support nice logo — Timichal • 11:04, 08. Jul 2006
  45. Support Support -- [[User:Maddox|Maddox]] 11:58, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Support Support Kellen 12:13, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Support Support I like it. Ek7 13:36, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Support Support Nice, nice design. 72.72.52.129 (Sorry, that was me -Cantara 16:56, 8 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]
  49. Support Support Goes with the current and proposed names, is recognizable as a Wikimedia page, and just looks good overall. --Gray Porpoise 18:32, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Support Support Really nice --Sasa Stefanovic 00:08, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Support Support --B1mbo 00:13, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Support Support --Tooby 15:52, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Support Support Messedrocker 23:13, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Support Support --Jollyroger 07:56, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Support Support --Habakuk 10:01, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Support Support simply perfect. --Elian 16:00, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Support. -- Carbidfischer 16:16, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Beautiful. -- tonync (talk) (講) 01:15, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Support Support -- Very sober, and conveys the message. Redux 02:05, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Support Support Simple and beautiful. --Aphaia 09:05, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Support Support Renice 16:03, 12 July 2006 (UTC) -- Great concept. However, I prefer the vertical half line (4b) over the horizontal breaks -- the vertical line has a more dynamic feel while the horizontal line seems static, which is certainly not the connotation that fits here.[reply]
  62. Support Support -- FlipDarius 17:11, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Support Support 4b looks best. - Kookykman|(t)(c) 18:42, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Support Support --Flyout 06:16, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Support Support --24.71.223.148 22:10, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Support Support --Utcursch 11:05, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Hopefully the final version WON'T BE IN ALL CAPS tho. -- Jeandré, 2006-07-15t12:24z
    Why not? Most of the others are. Daniel (‽) Check out Wikiscope! 13:45, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate on the permanent logo of Wikimedia Incubator. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikimedia_Incubator/logo/archive&oldid=399048"