Wiki Bíblia

This is a **proposal for a new** Wikimedia sister project.
Wiki Bíblia
Status of the proposal
Status	rejected
Reason	unanimously rejected and clearly redundant to Wikisource; the goals of the project are also not related to education, or even simply helping believers, but rather to religious evangelism/conversion which is absolutely out of the scope and spirit of Wikimedia.
Details of the proposal
Project description	projeto colaborativo que abriga passagens da Bíblia através da Tradução Brasileira da Bíblia
Is it a multilingual wiki?	yes
Potential number of languages	50
Proposed tagline	A Bíblia livre
Proposed URL	http://pt.wikibible.org
Technical requirements
New features to require	main page, Wiki Bíblia, Usuário, Módulo, MediaWiki
Development wiki	wb:Wiki Bíblia
Interested participants
	Wikipédia, Wikcionário, Wikilivros, Wikidata, Wikimedia Incubator, Wikiversidade
	v; t; e;

A minha proposta é divulgar a palavra de Deus através da Tradução Brasileira da Bíblia.

Proposed by

Não há nomes alternativos. O nome do novo projeto será Wiki Bíblia.

Divulgar a palavra de Deus.

(main page), Wiki Bíblia, Usuário, Módulo, MediaWiki

Oppose that's what Wikisource is for. And this is also subjective as well. SHB2000 (talk | contibs) 06:51, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note to others on this page, there's also a discussion on the talk page about this project too (see Talk:Wiki Bíblia) SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 06:09, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose and this is different from Wikisource or Wikiquote… how? Dronebogus (talk) 18:48, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ Strong oppose. I presume you want to translate into Portuguese? I suggest checking whether pt.wikisource.org already has, or wants, such a project. Alsee (talk) 03:48, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Update: The author of this proposal has contacted me.[1] Their goal is religious conversion, and they equate support for this project with their own personal religious sect. I am now persuaded that the intentions for this proposal are incompatible with our mission, policies, and values. I do not believe participation by editors of diverse faiths would be welcome. If we ever did go forwards with a project like this we would need to do so under different leadership than the current proposal-author. Alsee (talk) 21:12, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose••Pierpao (talk) 23:25, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]