User talk:Rsk6400

Welcome to Meta!

Hello, Rsk6400. Welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Wikimedia Forum (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). Happy editing!

-- 07:59, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

A common sense request for a sincere apology

As I am by no means connected to a certain BahausFan account on the English Wikipedia and based on a completely erroneous insinuation by you that the respective user might be 'identical to them [i.e., me]' on the talk page of the Germans article (which I haven't edited at all since what happened to me on the English Wikipedia nor do I ever intend to edit again at all both in the near and distant future) on the respective version of Wikipedia, I request a common sense-based sincere apology for incorrectly mentioning me (also without my permission) and giving me a rather unwanted additional notification that I had to read when I was active on another version of Wikipedia which gave me a significant negative/unpleasant experience. All the best!

P.S. I would also like you to refrain from mentioning me ever again there given the fact that:

1) I am not able to respond to your potential messages or potential false insinuations (which can be perceived as accusations before my eyes... at the same time, these can be construed as personal attacks on someone who cannot even properly defend himself there which isn't fair at all);
2) You had incorrectly labelled me as 'them' when it was, is, and will always be 'him/he'. I am a man...
3) I am by no means connected to the English Wikipedia at the moment nor will I be anytime in the near future (I will not describe that much the reasons why this happened here on the grounds of politeness and elegance).
4) I do not have nor will I ever create additional accounts so as to edit any version of Wikipedia, all the more the English version of Wikipedia because this violates the policies, rules, and regulations of Wikipedia and I am firmly against multiple accounts regarding myself and my activity on any version of Wikipedia.
5) Personally, I have to admit that I am not a fan of Bahaus architecture but I am not against it either, so there's an additional point here why I am not that respective user. At the same time, no, I do not consider that the article on Germans on the English Wikipedia is 'very poorly' made (however, even hypothetically, there is still room for improvement there if some editors want or can do this according to their own judgement), but it is by no means my responsibility now (or ever again in the future) to cast any assessment (personal/subjective or general/objective) on that article. It can be, if you want, an attribute of your activity there or other, more knowledgable users with respect to the culture, history, art, and science of the Germans (which indeed did significant contributions in mankind's history).
6) As for labelling some of my edits 'poorly done' in the past on the English Wikipedia (thank you very much for your kindness and consideration once again), I will not judge your activity there on Wikipedia because I don't want to, I am not interested in it at all, frankly speaking, and I do not have the moral or even Christian-based right to do so, if you can hopefully understand what I mean. Nonetheless, I would like to kindly remind you that I successfully corrected a historical mistake that you did on the article regarding Germans on the English Wikipedia and that even you mentioned that part of my edits there are 'ok' (and I contributed to the article on the Germans a significant amount of edits which passed your judgement, at least in part). Therefore, this speaks volume of how 'poorly done' my activity was there and how much disrespect I faced stemming from you when I did not personally attack you, did not have this intention (and still do not have it), and you had all the admins on your side subsequently (and no, I am by no means a victim, but this what truly happened). Last but not least, I did not have a conflict with you, did not want it, still do not want it, will never want it, but, from my point of view at least, you certainly had something against me (and I am not interested what it really is, I have to admit with utmost sincerity). All the best once again! Rosenborg BK Fan (talk) 15:16, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Why don't you apologise as it is normal and common sense to do in such an inconvenience created by you? Do you think this is acceptable to do? Rosenborg BK Fan (talk) 09:16, 29 July 2024 (UTC)