User talk:Quintinense

Blocked

block log ipblocklist crossblock luxo's unblock remove gblock contribs: +/- You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Meta due to abusing multiple accounts. "Avoiding scrutiny" (see w:Wikipedia:SOCK#Inappropriate_uses_of_alternative_accounts). Pretending to be somebody else to deceive editors and prevent them from reviewing contributions. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, and privacy violations are considered vandalism, and will not be tolerated. If you believe the block was placed in error, you may place an unblock request on your talk page using {{unblock|reason}}.

” T_ele^s (T _{@ L C S}) 15:01, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Unblock request declined This blocked user has had their unblock request reviewed by one or more administrators, who has/have reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Request reason: No use of any sock, never used more than one account to reinforce the point of view in META. I used "Marcus Luccas" when used "Marcus Luccas" in en-wiki, and as soon as I discovered on en-wiki, I started using "Quintinense" here again. This lock is retaliatory because the administrator Teles know I will vote against him next election to STEWARD. Quintinense 21:02, 25 January 2012 (UTC) Decline reason: Putting it mildly you're not yet globally locked for technical reasons. --Vituzzu 22:48, 25 January 2012 (UTC) বাংলা | English | español | français | magyar | italiano | 한국어 | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | українська | 中文 | edit

block log gblock log blocklist stalktoy guc unblock gunblock contribs: +/-