User talk:MarcoAurelio/Archives/2011-04
 | Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in April 2011, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion or the archives index. |
vec.wikipedia automatic approval
Hi! I see you added vec.wikipedia to the Bot policy/Implementation table back in August.[1] What I'd like to know is, did the project really decide to allow automatic approval somewhere? The only thing I can find is this, which states that global bots are allowed but does not mention anything about automatic approval. Bot requests for vec.wikipedia seem to still be automatically approved,[2][3] but I can't find anywhere where the community accepted that. In any case, shouldn't it be explicitly stated on the bot policy page for automatic approval to be allowed? Regards, Jafeluv 11:08, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, automatic approval must be explicity allowed. I think I remember seeing it at vecwiki but if as of today they don't, the table should note that autoaproval is not allowed. Thanks, -- Dferg ☎ talk 15:48, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks for the response. I'll update the table accordingly. Jafeluv 15:54, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Galician Wikipedia
Thanks for the notice about Bambifan. I was sure that it should be an important case, but I couldn't find any information about it. Interestingly, he attacked us just one week after finishing a 1-year block period... So it appears that he/she keeps a good record of blocking expiring times. Thanks again. If you need any help, ;) let us know. --Xabier Cid 01:18, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
Help
We are being attacked again by Pdghjig on Galician Wikipedia (aka Bambifan). Thanks! --Xabier Cid 01:47, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- Dealt with by Bsadowski1. Regards, -- Dferg ☎ talk 22:14, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
De wikipedia Española
He usado un ejemplo de una edición tuya para explicar lo que es un proxy abierto y como se actua con ello.[4]
Por otro lado te animo de gran gana que entres y lo leeas por que hay casos de bloqueos a IP's "para siempre" que son un poco controvertidos. Son alrededor de 300 casos de bloqueo hasta dentro del final del tiempo y que nadie revisará.Bloqueo de una IP para siempre en el café
Un saludo --85.57.213.224 09:50, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
- Hola 85.57.213.224, gracias por la nota. Consideraré comentar en el hilo abierto por usted en esa sección del café. Un saludo, -- Dferg ☎ talk 13:25, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Buenas tardes
Buenas tardes, monsieur Dferg. Pasaba a saludarle porque de paso le he visto, como solía ser habitual tiempos ha, en mi lista de seguimiento. Un abrazo, ;). --Góngora (T•ES) 14:12, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
- Buenas tardes Góngora. Gracias por acordarte de este pobre viejo :) Como siempre, un placer saber de tí. Alegra a uno el día. Un abrazo y gracias, -- Dferg ☎ talk 17:14, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Job done ;). Could you just please check that everything is okay ? -- Quentinv57 (talk) 09:11, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you! - Looks ok to me. -- Dferg ☎ talk 09:45, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
Administration Request
There is no active community on Sanskrit Wikipedia and even the administrators are not active. I don't think that I would be able to get enough votes. Pleas try to understand. Vibhijain 10:33, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
- I've replied at Steward requests/Permissions. -- Dferg ☎ talk 11:57, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your clarification on the spam blacklist talk page.
[5]. Thanks. --Abd 21:55, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
- You are welcome. Sorry for any inconvenience or missunderstanding I may have caused. -- Dferg ☎ talk 21:56, 30 April 2011 (UTC)