User talk:MarcoAurelio/Archives/2010-04
 | Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in April 2010, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion or the archives index. |
Thank you
I would like to thank you this month since this is the first time the new group has been active. There are many great returning stewards, but I wanted to emphasis in this month's Steward of the Month one of the new people who may not have the same patterns, systems, and the well defined routine. Already, you are among Meta's most dedicated contributors and have already proven yourself as a well-rounded and active steward with a level of productivity that cross-wiki users should aspire to. You have been entered as the Steward of March 2010 in my Steward Recognition Project for your invaluable work. Thank you. Ottava Rima (talk) 00:34, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
- Well, I have no words so; thank you! - many things I know today have been taught to me by great users. Some of them have left, some others are still here; and I'd like to extend this recognition to all those people too. BR, — Dferg (talk) 09:25, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Desysop
I think User:EdBever is pretty active in spam areas which may not show up as admin actions? Regards --Herby talk thyme 18:03, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- Hey Herby. That list is not permanent and that's why I requested a bureaucrat to review the list; but it seems that somebody else ignored that and started messaging all of them... — Dferg (talk) 18:21, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- Great minds think alike, I just left a comment about this the same place. Finn Rindahl 18:25, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- That list is to be rechecked and nobody had to be informed of the process till that list where verified for errors. I took the data from this tool & contribs list. VVV seems to be taking care of it. Thanks and sorry, — Dferg (talk) 18:53, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- Not your fault at all Dferg, just someone (else) being a bit to eager. With "great minds" I didn't just mean me and Herby - you were included as well ;) Finn Rindahl 20:07, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, but I feel bad because I tried to help, and it became a complete mess... Regards, — Dferg (talk) 20:19, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- Not a criticism of you I assure you. I know from the past that "admin actions" can be less than obvious at times :) Thanks & regards --Herby talk thyme 08:48, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. Seems fixed now and the process can continue normally. — Dferg (talk) 11:24, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
- Not a criticism of you I assure you. I know from the past that "admin actions" can be less than obvious at times :) Thanks & regards --Herby talk thyme 08:48, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, but I feel bad because I tried to help, and it became a complete mess... Regards, — Dferg (talk) 20:19, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- Not your fault at all Dferg, just someone (else) being a bit to eager. With "great minds" I didn't just mean me and Herby - you were included as well ;) Finn Rindahl 20:07, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- That list is to be rechecked and nobody had to be informed of the process till that list where verified for errors. I took the data from this tool & contribs list. VVV seems to be taking care of it. Thanks and sorry, — Dferg (talk) 18:53, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- Great minds think alike, I just left a comment about this the same place. Finn Rindahl 18:25, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
Vandalism
Hi, need to block 72.159.150.88 from vandalism immediately. Thanks! –BruTe talk 18:38, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
- Done. Thank you for reverting & reporting. For urgent requests you can also try RFH or IRC.
- --Dferg 18:42, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks! :) –BruTe talk 18:45, 26 April 2010 (UTC)