User talk:Jonathan de Boyne Pollard
Add topicLatest comment: 12 years ago by Jasper Deng in topic Note
Apologies...
[edit]...if it has been rough arguing with me. I have little patience when I'm physically exhausted, and I sometimes don't know that it's taking a toll on others online.--Jasper Deng (talk) 03:00, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Can we move this to a subpage of IPv6 initiative please? --MZMcBride (talk) 01:54, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Note
[edit]Look, you have to accept that while I do introduce inaccuracies, your text confuses readers and has things that are just plain wrong, like the rangeblock recommendation, local listings, and the MediaWiki technical restriction. Calling me "clueless" is not going to solve this any faster.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:19, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
- What would solve it faster, is your realizing that there's nothing to solve. You are downright wrong, and your editing has been inept, innumerate, and clueless. All this whilst shouting to all that will listen that you're correcting "factual errors". You're not correcting things at all. You're the source of factual errors, so many and with such speed using your automated-editing "Training Wheels" program that I have to revert you wholesale just to keep up. My goodness, man! You cannot even count! Jonathan de Boyne Pollard (talk) 20:13, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry, but your documentation will not be taken as official unless you change your attitude. I won't say anything more.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:22, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
- Arrogating to yourself the gatekeepership of what's official, Jasper Deng, is what is actually a bad attitude around here. And you exhibit this in the face of people who actually know what they're talking about pointing you to eight-year-old information that you should have known and suffering from your repeated onslaughts of truly basic and clueless factual errors made at inhuman speed with an automated editing device, even when it's pointed out to you several times that you're wrong and that what you're introducing your errors into in fact already pointed to the necessary information for you to determine that you were wrong before you even touched it. Jonathan de Boyne Pollard (talk) 12:36, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- Multiple editors have told you that your page has some incorrect things, and you have to stop making personal attacks or you may get an account block.--Jasper Deng (talk) 17:51, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- Telling you that you're downright wrong, and that you've been adding factual errors with an automated editing tool faster than a human being can edit is not a personal attack, unless one has a particularly self-serving definition of personal attack. And I strongly recommend that you don't do anything as foolish as block an expert contributor for correcting your repeated high-speed attempts to introduce fundamental and innumerate factual errors into a userspace guide written by that expert contributor. Jonathan de Boyne Pollard (talk) 10:41, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Please behave. Even if Jasper Deng did some mistake he's in good company (since you put twice a 144bit-long ipv6), but we're not doing homework so mistakes just need to be fixed. In silence. --Vituzzu (talk) 22:23, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
- Telling you that you're downright wrong, and that you've been adding factual errors with an automated editing tool faster than a human being can edit is not a personal attack, unless one has a particularly self-serving definition of personal attack. And I strongly recommend that you don't do anything as foolish as block an expert contributor for correcting your repeated high-speed attempts to introduce fundamental and innumerate factual errors into a userspace guide written by that expert contributor. Jonathan de Boyne Pollard (talk) 10:41, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Multiple editors have told you that your page has some incorrect things, and you have to stop making personal attacks or you may get an account block.--Jasper Deng (talk) 17:51, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- Arrogating to yourself the gatekeepership of what's official, Jasper Deng, is what is actually a bad attitude around here. And you exhibit this in the face of people who actually know what they're talking about pointing you to eight-year-old information that you should have known and suffering from your repeated onslaughts of truly basic and clueless factual errors made at inhuman speed with an automated editing device, even when it's pointed out to you several times that you're wrong and that what you're introducing your errors into in fact already pointed to the necessary information for you to determine that you were wrong before you even touched it. Jonathan de Boyne Pollard (talk) 12:36, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry, but your documentation will not be taken as official unless you change your attitude. I won't say anything more.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:22, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
- And I have now nominated it for deletion at Meta:Requests for deletion. You are welcome to voice your concerns.--Jasper Deng (talk) 22:16, 24 November 2012 (UTC)