Jump to content

User talk:Jlohr (WMF)

Add topic
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki


Afrikaans | العربية | অসমীয়া | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Boarisch | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца) | български | ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ | বাংলা | བོད་ཡིག | bosanski | català | کوردی | corsu | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Zazaki | ދިވެހިބަސް | Ελληνικά | emiliàn e rumagnòl | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | Nordfriisk | Frysk | galego | Alemannisch | ગુજરાતી | עברית | हिन्दी | Fiji Hindi | hrvatski | magyar | հայերեն | interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Ido | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | ភាសាខ្មែរ | 한국어 | Qaraqalpaqsha | kar | kurdî | Limburgs | ລາວ | lietuvių | Minangkabau | македонски | മലയാളം | молдовеняскэ | Bahasa Melayu | မြန်မာဘာသာ | مازِرونی | Napulitano | नेपाली | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | Kapampangan | Norfuk / Pitkern | polski | português | português do Brasil | پښتو | Runa Simi | română | русский | संस्कृतम् | sicilianu | سنڌي | Taclḥit | සිංහල | slovenčina | slovenščina | Soomaaliga | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ꠍꠤꠟꠐꠤ | ślůnski | தமிழ் | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkmençe | Tagalog | Türkçe | татарча / tatarça | ⵜⴰⵎⴰⵣⵉⵖⵜ  | українська | اردو | oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 吴语 | 粵語 | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | +/-

Welcome to Meta!

[edit]

Hello, Jlohr (WMF). Welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Wikimedia Forum (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). Happy editing!

-- 00:32, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

User:Jlohr (WMF)

[edit]

Hi. I created a very brief user page for you here: User:Jlohr (WMF). When you have a minute, please expand it! :-) --MZMcBride (talk) 18:02, 29 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

List of arriving/departing people

[edit]

Hello, congratulations for your new responsibilities. I wonder if you might be interested in restoring some transparency about WMF staff. I think the main thing, which happens to be also the easiest to fix, is an official update of who left or arrived, similar to the staff changes reports (see also discussion). If a monthly update is too expensive, quarterly or even yearly would be better than nothing.

Moreover, I know arrivals/departures are often (or most of the times?) announced internally; do you know if there is some thinking or written guidance on when to keep such announcements private, so that I can understand the current situation? --Nemo 09:23, 14 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Wikimedia Foundation Talent & Culture Department quarterly goals, Jul–Sep 2016 (Q1 FY2016-17).pdf. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at this page. Thanks again for your cooperation. —MarcoAurelio 11:40, 10 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Re: Chief Product Officer search and job description

[edit]

Syntactically, «advocate for the Wikimedia movement, Foundation, and values» is a rather weird coordination, which makes the sentence hard to understand. Maybe it selects for people who understand it was written as a piece of code rather than an English sentence, so it stands for "Wikimedia {movement, Foundation, values}". :-)

There is some inconsistency in the usage of terms: "contributors, and readers" but then "users, contributors" (both can simply replaced by "users", unless you are using "users" with some special meaning). (There's also an apparent false dichotomy later which is very web 1.0, "content-building communities" vs. "readers".)

More seriously, can you clarify what "revenue growth" means in this context?

The experience and skills section is smoother. Nemo 20:11, 17 August 2017 (UTC)Reply