User talk:Gordafarid

regard

For the next times, it would be better if you would first discuss such matters with me. I'm aware that you are currently unable to edit in Farsi Wikipedia, but I think you could email me in this regard, before posting on the request for checkuser. Best, Huji 22:42, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

ok, you`re right and I do apologize for that. now what`s your opinion about that? If you opposed, I take away that request. then come to my talk page in en.wiki, I need your help to biuld one persian template. thanks,--Gordafarid 23:26, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

I think we should never make specific requests, unless we have good reasons to. The users against which Spring2000 should be checked, are all the active users of Fa WP. Those you named there, although sharing a common point of view, which is against yours in some cases, are very well established users; thus, it is not a good idea to suspect them in specific.

And, it is not a good practice to add a welcome message to your own talk page, putting my signature under it. I will remove that, as I just removed the welcome message you posted on my talk which is totally unnecessary. Huji 07:51, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

0k, that`s good idea and I agree with erase welcome messages and others. but only one point about POV of them, I agree with you that they are active, but they have very express slamic POV and be express against the USA and Israel and their activition against the free and NPOV wikipedia. they against me, because I love the NPOV that u know it as well. which you say that my POV against them is correct, but u must add that they POV againest the NPOV and further the NPOV wikipedians. in this manner I suggest the checkuser them for progress the fa.wiki to a NPOV wiki, not POV of islamize or persians. I repeat this for 1000th time: we have fa.wiki, nor islamic.wiki or persian.wiki!!regards,--Gordafarid 08:35, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

I take the point you made about POV and NPOV stuff, yet do not think checkuser is the right means to address this problem. Huji 12:14, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

it maybe not addressed the problem completely, but could be a way to disturbing the POV pusher bands! do you think vice versa?!--Gordafarid 14:42, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

That is a side-effect of checkusers, perhaps, not the main effect. Checkuser is not intended to be used in those cases, although it "may" have an effect. We should address the problem with the appropriate tool Huji 19:47, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

dear gordafarid

are you active here? --Mardetanha 21:08, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi Gordi, check this out! I found this accusation of you, having socks really ridiculous! --Kaaveh Ahangar 00:16, 22 July 2008 (UTC)