User talk:Fifelfoo
Add topicI reply wherever the conversation started. If you do the "talk back" replying method, you'll find that the conversation gets disjointed with me.
Welcome to Meta!
[edit]
Hello Fifelfoo, and welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Wikimedia Forum (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). If you would like, feel free to ask me questions on my talk page. Happy editing! Tempodivalse [talk] 00:25, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Diffs of edits in violation of consensus on en., with explanations and outcomes
[edit]| Time | Diff | Problem | Discussion | Cause | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03:13 | diff | Non-steward edit (vandal reverted) | at meta | User unaware of Steward only editing | Resolved, user now made aware of need to not conduct non-steward edits |
| 11:56 | diff | Non-steward edit (improved content) | at meta | Unaware of powers, SOPA block specifics | Resolved, user now aware of powers, need to not conduct non-steward edits |
| 07:38 | diff | Non-steward edit (improved content linkages) | at meta | Manual timezone calculation plus editor doesn't use java | Resolved, user aware of need to not conduct non-steward edits |
| 06:12 | This edit summary: "06:12 . . Nyttend (Talk contribs) changed event visibility of "(Deletion log)": hid username for 1 event (Is it possible to do RevDel when Wikipedia is engaging in blatant WP:POINT violations?)" | Editorialising edit summary without right of reply | at meta | At en. | At en. AN |
| 05:30 | diff | Non-steward edit (reverted vandalism) | at meta | Vandalism immediately prior to close, revert requested | Resolved, counselled |
Tentative analysis: two minor incompetence errors with a probable third (and we're all incompetent sometimes), plus one error of judgement in editorialising at an inappropriate moment. This is a fairly good outcome for a "picket line." All other edits so far appear to be essential maintenance, appropriate WMF blackout connected, or user space tinkering. Fifelfoo 00:26, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
More over, all of these edits would otherwise be "legitimate," if the encyclopaedia were open to general editing. None were problematic edits by themselves, but only became problematic due to the context of the blackout and site lock. Numerous other Steward edits occurred within the ambit of Steward edits that would be appropriate at any time (copyright, legal, etc.) Fifelfoo 01:54, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
Fuller discussion of this table is occurring at en. AN now that it is open to normal user editing. Fifelfoo 05:35, 19 January 2012 (UTC)