User talk:DannyS712/EasyResolve

Mark a discussion as resolved

Can the respective /* ⋯ */ anchor be prepended to the edit summary? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:23, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

I'll try to figure out how to do that, but no promises --DannyS712 (talk) 09:59, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Find the heading in edit form and then do EasyResolve.summary = '/* ' + heading + ' */' + blah-blah-blah. It is not guaranteed against minor bugs like phab:T229270, but will work in 98% cases. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 14:40, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Please add this. It's really annoying when people use this script as it omits a proper edit summary. Enhancing999 (talk) 17:47, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Wrong usage

How does this work? It seems to me it marks discussions resolved even they are not resolved. Juandev (talk) 09:58, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Its just for adding the resolved template --DannyS712 (talk) 09:59, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

So somebody adds the template, or who? Juandev (talk) 19:42, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Yes, that is what the script does --DannyS712 (talk) 19:45, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Xtools autoedits

@DannyS712: Hello again!

Can you add this tool to the Xtools autoedit? This time hopefully there should be no confusion since you yourself created the tool :).Jonteemil (talk) 19:02, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Apparently someone else already asked for this - phab:T243630 DannyS712 (talk) 19:28, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Oh, it was only implemented locally on meta though. I've requested it be global now.Jonteemil (talk) 20:01, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

I don't think it should be global (and would have objected to it on meta) since its so niche --DannyS712 (talk) 20:14, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

@DannyS712: Well, it is an automatic tool that can be used globally. I don't see how its nicheness would make you don't want it to be listed as an automatic tool.Jonteemil (talk) 20:11, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

I don't think it needs to be listed in autoedits at all, but if you want to file a phab task go ahead --DannyS712 (talk) 20:15, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

@Jonteemil: The global usage is marginal. Adding it to AutoEdits will only unnecessarily slow down the tool. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:42, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Meta:Requests for deletion

@DannyS712: Any way to make the tool work for RfD too? 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:45, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Sure, will do DannyS712 (talk) 17:52, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

@DannyS712: Any updates? I don't participate in RfDs at the moment, but this would certainly be a useful feature. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:35, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, not working on this at the moment, but there aren't many discussions at RfD so its not a big priority DannyS712 (talk) 15:11, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Too few threads are marked as solved

I have suggested adding a button mark threads as solved as part of Community Wishlist/Wishes/Do not fully archive unsolved issues on Talk pages. The discussiontools used e.g. in mw: also has this feature but a button to mark threads is solved in Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons (and most users do not have this gadget installed). This makes it harder to track & solve unsolved issues.

The gadget can also be used on Commons, added a note to Template:Section resolved#See also. Prototyperspective (talk) 17:13, 26 October 2024 (UTC)