User talk:Bigbukhari
Add topicWelcome to Meta!
Hello, Bigbukhari. Welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Wikimedia Forum if you need help with something (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). Also worthwhile acquainting yourself with the functions of global user pages. Happy editing!
— Bukhari (Talk!) 17:02, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Issues with Wikigap Pakistan 2020 Results
[edit]I want to highlight a few things regarding Wikigap Pakistan 2020 results. First of all, I respect the decision taken by jury and judges but as a regular participant of Wikipedia Challenges and a Judge in “Wiki Loves South Asian Women”, I want to add my two cents.
| User | Articles | Points | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| Umeedawan | 59 | 3372 | 5 |
| Sianf(سیانف) | 81 | 3025 | 2 |
| Hania Tarik | 52 | 2390 | 1 |
| Mr. Afzal | 77 | 2603 | 4 |
| Obaid Raza | 27 | 875 | 6 |
| Suneel Malik | 9 | 650 | 3 |
User Suneel Malik with just 9 articles and 650 points stands at 3rd position and a user with 59 articles and 3372 points at position 5. Kindly, explain the criteria for such positioning. I have alead of around 1000 points over Hania Tarik and 400 over Sianf and 2700 over Suneel Malik in points.
As a data analyst, I have taken a whole day after to compile relevant data of participants and sharing it with you to analyze and compare with your data.
Wikigap Pakistan 2020 User Article Data Analysis
According to the ruleset for the competition, articles would be judged by adding bytes , references, new pages , categories, images and adding to projects to make Wikipedia data more meaningful and rich for analysis.
10+ articles of mine have more than 50 references including 5 articles with 78+ articles. I have 5articles securing around 150 points. 3 of my articles are not reviewed correctly otherwise I have one article that touched 200 points as well. I have covered the longest and lengthiest articles in the competition (5 articles with 40K plus bytes).
I would like to request to review my articles and points before finalizing the results. I am ready to provide more data and stats to support my claim.
Articles to Review again
[edit]Following 3 articles are not reviewed correctly (I made a mistake and it was overlooked as well).
ur:نرگس فخری Points: 46688 bytes=46; references(102)=102; new categories(71)=35.5; Wikiproject(1)=0.5 - Total: 184;
ur:حدیقہ کیانی (Correct Review should be Points: 48873 new bytes=48; new references(102)=; new categories(99)=49.5;
Wikiproject(1)=0.5 - Total 200;)
ur:صبا قمر (Correct Review should be Points: 46972 new bytes=46; new references(83)=83; new categories(81)=40.5;
Wikiproject(1)=0.5 - Total: 170;)
(ur:مایا علی) Article points not calculated correctly
[edit]ur:مایا علی Points: 22800 new bytes=22; references(58)=58; New Categories(28)=14; Wikiproject(1)=0.5 - Total: 94.5; Reviewed: 22+58+14+0.5=40.5 (06.12.20) Reviewed incorrectly. 22+58+14+0.5=94.5 should be total points
Not reviewed by me Bigbukhari (talk) 07:21, 7 December 2020 (UTC)