User:EGalvez (WMF)/Sandbox/Wikimedia Conference Session Notes
Appearance
Learning Day
[edit]Volunteer Engagement
[edit]Strengths | Struggles |
---|---|
|
|
Roles
[edit]New
[edit]- Internships
- Mentorships
- Financial support
- wiki project specific training (offline)
- Tutorial videos, handbooks, cheat-books
- Curiosity
- make a difference
- don't make it feel like a factory - think of ways to return dedication further than thank you notes.
- make sure there is an open door
Existing
[edit]- Professional training
- Access to expertise
- Connections
- Partnerships
- Support for grants (local & global)
- Documentation support
- organization has notability in the country
- developing skills
- fun/social
- have an emotional connection to wp already
- Document what you learn
- be responsive
Motivations
[edit]New
[edit]- Attend Annual general meeting
- Legitimate
- fresh/openness
- Connection to roots
- Personal interests attract new volunteers - new exxposure
- learn & challenge the existing group - shake up
- bring own projcts
- No vision yet
- Students learn with WEP, reinforce what they learn in school
- sharing vs knowledge vs altruism; learning, reading, writing
- Wiki Loves Monuments is very different - care more about photographs
- Provide opportunities
- Give access to resources, fund for travelling photos,
- Global underrepresentation for their culture & community; motivated to fill in gaps --> can invite new volunteers to help fill in gaps
- Money for projects
- Facilitation, connections
- interest/agenda
- Novelty enthusiasm
- Be involved, help
- feel more official
- identity "I'm a Wikipedian.."
- New, democratic , free
- Look at my edits!
Existing
[edit]- havint finished mission
- skills & resources (e.g. writing articles, content building)
- Bridge & ambassadors
- vision of how they will help
- "volunteers" is value - image of the organization is different of the organization
- cultural foundation --> "sense of community" how to measure?
- volunteers stay longer if they become paid staff?
- Career progression in organization
- Loyalty, invested
- ownership/empower
- Developing skills
- Career, life development
- Apply experiences to personal life
- Organizational changes
Strategies for Engagement
[edit]0 - 6 months
[edit]- Telling interesting wikimedia stories
- Role models
- Mentorships
- OFfline meetings
- Access to the brand wikimedia
- Swags
- Positive feedback (frequently)
- Public recognition (depending on volunteer)
- Connection to peer groups
6 mo - 1 year
[edit]- Shared power -- move up in organization
- Welcome! Frendly encouragement
- Praise --> Recognition
- Veterans being gracious
- Give them purpose
- Process for veterans to help
- Recognition in press
- Appearances at conferences
- How to help chapters groups
- Show them how to change how they edit
- Encourage them based on their work
- Mentors -> get veterans officially involed
- Give them opportunities to guide
- Online presence and connections
- Events for editors
1-2 years
[edit]- Local meet-ups
- Recognition
- Encourage to run own project 00> Funds for projects generated from community, gives a sense of ownership
- Send to conferences
- Wikipedia of month/year
- Attribution via annual reports
- Engage other NGO's via jury
- Share stories in local newspapers
- Organize unconference and engage volunteers ; session leaders & facilitators
- Mentorship matching when facing challenges
- Be thankful to those who have been around
- Send cards & verbal gratitude
- What would they tell their friends and family?
- their awards & their work
- number of articles they've written
- Good civic involvement & donating time
2+ years
[edit]- Keep providing opportunities
- Make sure people have fun
- Actively reaching out; make them feel there is a good reason to come back --> personalized
- offline - have an open-office day
- Announce frequently on the same mailing list
- It is important to meet people in person to keep volunteers engaged
- With online volunteers to need to designated times to engage them
- Make events a series
- continue to show appreciation
- Professional developing in areas they are interested in
Community Listening with Surveys
[edit]Group 1
[edit]- Think of what the results will influence
- Have questions related to your expectations
- Test the survey with people (board members, and wikipedians will help you make questions clear and distinct)
- Volunteers may question why an organization is doing a survey -- may get negative
- Feedback about the survey
- Challenged why you are spending money on this
- Posting survey to village pump and newsletter
- People compain I didn't hear, I didn't want to hear about this
- related to topics they didn't like/do not contact
- List of questions are spcific related to where there was a problem (biased in this way)
- For proper survey, need to watch out for biases
- Doing surveys about community for replication in other communities
- Publish Results: commons, WMNL, wiki-l, newsletter
- Ask communities for input about approaches in the organization (e.g. communications, conflict training, gender, that may result in offline workshop)
Group 2
[edit]- pre-testing with board/community members - set up a test dataset
- know and communicate they WHY of your surveys
- Be clear how the answers can lead to actions
- Use communicate in the right channels --> local village pump
- Don't do it too often
- Focus on questions you really need - do a check for each question
Group 3
[edit]- Need to target the people intended
- Know who to target and how - didn't know how to use site notice
- Questions must be clear and exact
- Still agenda to what you ask
- Survey by WMF years ago - questions can skew results if leading questions - leading to answers by method, including inclustion of participants - some dont want to use google surveys
- Analysis - profession - sometimes need to ask/have someone who knows what they are doing
- Double check question - ask experienced outsider - pilot with small set of people
- Not too many questions or all same type of questions
- Open-ended questions are difficult to analyze - can cause fatigue
- Need balance
- Complex language - Response bias
Community involvement
- Discussion on limit to see what we should ask from who
- Learn what questions communities need to answer
- Allow to review an document on designed draft
- Be cautious if surveys are for research in which knowing in advance may alter future answers.
Group 4
[edit]Strengths
- Understand demographics
- Getting information about interests
- Anonymity
Weaknesses
- Not enough responses
- Not representative results
- Targeting the wrong audience
Opportunities
- Close in time to an event (right timing)
- Test with a group
- Innovative and user friendly design
Threats
- Bad survey design
- Survey fatigue
- Lacking motivation and polarized answers