Universal Code of Conduct/Board ratification change log/fr

Code de conduite universel

• Politique
• Directives d'application
• Comité de coordination (U4C) charte
• Présentation du projet
• Foire aux questions
• Modules de formation

The following are revisions made to the Universal Code of Conduct by the Board of Trustees during the ratification process. These changes were made to increase clarity or reinforce concepts included in the draft Code submitted on Oct. 13, 2020.

Change	Rationale
Preamble/"Why We Have .."
Added: "We are committed to ensuring that it remains so, including by embracing this Code of Conduct and revisiting for updates as needed."	The Board is intent on expressing this commitment strongly, and is committed to facilitating future revisions.
Changed: "This applies to all contributors and participants in their interaction with all contributors and participants, without distinction based on age, mental or physical disabilities, physical appearance, national, religious, ethnic and cultural background, caste, social class, wealth, language fluency, sexual orientation, gender identity, sex or career field. Nor will we distinguish based on standing, skills or accomplishments in the Wikimedia projects or movement." → "This applies to all contributors and participants in their interaction with all contributors and participants, without expectations based on age, mental or physical disabilities, physical appearance, national, religious, ethnic and cultural background, caste, social class, wealth, language fluency, sexual orientation, gender identity, sex or career field. Nor will we make exceptions based on standing, skills or accomplishments in the Wikimedia projects or movement."	Clarification d'un point de confusion autour de l'utilisation du terme "distinguer".
2.1 : Le respect mutuel
Changed "Listen and try to understand what Wikimedians of different backgrounds have to tell you." → "Écoutez et essayez de comprendre ce que les wikimédiens de différents horizons veulent vous dire."	Copyedit for clarity
Added: "All Wikimedians should assume unless evidence otherwise exists that others are here to collaboratively improve the projects, but this should not be used to justify statements with a harmful impact."	"Présumer la bonne foi" peut être utilisé pour justifier un mauvais comportement. Nous tenons à préciser que ce concept peut être utilisé de manière abusive.
Added: "During in-person meetings, we will be welcoming to everyone and we will be mindful and respectful of each others’ preferences, boundaries, sensibilities, traditions and requirements."	Les frontières sont importantes, notamment dans les contextes physiques.
3.1 Harcèlement
Changed:  "Behaviour can be considered harassment if it is beyond what a reasonable person would be expected to tolerate (given the cultural context and expectations of the people involved)." → "Un comportement peut être considéré comme du harcèlement s'il va au-delà de ce qu'une personne raisonnable serait censée tolérer dans un environnement global et interculturel".	Insistez sur le fait que, dans le cadre de projets internationaux, les pratiques locales ne doivent pas prendre le pas sur un comportement interculturel de base.
Changed: "In some cases, repeated mockery, sarcasm, or aggression may constitute insults collectively, even if individual statements would not." → "In some cases, repeated mockery, sarcasm, or aggression constitute insults collectively, even if individual statements would not."	Copyedit for clarity
Changed: "(The terms "race" and "ethnicity" are included here as prohibited ways to distinguish people. The Wikimedia movement does not endorse these terms as meaningful distinctions among people and believes that they should not be used outside of prohibiting them as the basis for personal attacks)." → "(The Wikimedia movement does not endorse "race" and "ethnicity" as meaningful distinctions among people. Their inclusion here is to mark that they are prohibited in use against others as the basis for personal attacks.)"	Copyedit for clarity
Added: "and may include contacting workplaces or friends and family members in an effort to intimidate or embarass" [to definition of harassment]	Insistez sur le fait que ce comportement n'est pas acceptable car nous savons qu'il a été utilisé comme une forme d'attaque dans le passé.
Added: "or in situations where consent cannot be communicated" [to sexual harassment]	Clarify consent cannot be assumed.
Changed: "Hounding: following a person across the project(s) and repeatedly critiquing their otherwise satisfactory work mainly with the intent to upset or discourage them. If problems are continuing after efforts to communicate and educate, communities may need to address them but not via one individual's review" → Harcèlement : suivre une personne à travers le(s) projet(s) et critiquer de manière répétée son travail, principalement dans l'intention de la contrarier ou de la décourager. Si les problèmes persistent après les efforts de communication et d'éducation, les communautés peuvent avoir besoin de les aborder par le biais des processus communautaires établis.	Le conseil d'administration reconnaît que les bénévoles jouent un rôle essentiel en s'assurant que les personnes contribuent de manière constructive aux sites. Nous tenons à préciser que le fait de harceler les gens, même pour des erreurs, n'est pas un comportement approprié. En conséquence, nous considérons comme une norme minimale qu'après les efforts initiaux pour corriger et éduquer les utilisateurs, la responsabilité de la résolution des problèmes en cours doit passer de l'individu aux processus communautaires.
3.3 Content vandalism and abuse of the projects
Changed: "The gratuitous, unjustified and decontextualized addition of symbols, images, or any kind of content with the intent to intimidate or harm others (or to impose an arbitrary scheme on content)." → "The use of symbols, images, categories, tags or other kinds of content that are intimidating or harmful to others outside of the context of encyclopedic, informational use. This includes imposing schemes on content intended to marginalize or ostracize."	Le langage n'était pas clair, surtout pour les personnes dont l'anglais n'est pas la langue maternelle. L'intention était de clarifier mais de conserver la préoccupation centrale.
3.1 Harassment
Removed: " (Note: The Wikimedia movement does not endorse "race" and "ethnicity" as meaningful distinctions among people. Their inclusion here is to mark that they are prohibited in use against others as the basis for personal attacks.)"	The language created equity issues within our community and did not meet its intended purposes of supporting a safe and inclusive environment After reviewing community sentiment on this note at the community discussion and other venues, the Board of Trustees has resolved that it be removed from the Universal Code of Conduct.