From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Key:
- 1 = very weak or no alignment
- 3 = weak alignment
- 5 = passable alignment; room for significant improvement
- 7 = reasonably good alignment
- 10 = excellent alignment
| Scoring rubric
|
Score
|
(A) Impact potential
- Does it have the potential to increase gender diversity in Wikimedia projects, either in terms of content, contributors, or both?
- Does it have the potential for online impact?
- Can it be sustained, scaled, or adapted elsewhere after the grant ends?
|
|
(B) Community engagement
- Does it have a specific target community and plan to engage it often?
- Does it have community support?
|
|
(C) Ability to execute
- Can the scope be accomplished in the proposed timeframe?
- Is the budget realistic/efficient ?
- Do the participants have the necessary skills/experience?
|
|
(D) Measures of success
- Are there both quantitative and qualitative measures of success?
- Are they realistic?
- Can they be measured?
|
|
| Additional comments from the Committee:
|
