Template:IEG/Committee/Review/Score
Proposal review: scores, comments and feedback
[edit]This template was used to post aggregated feedback from the committee to a proposal's talk page (and so it still needs to work on some of the oldest IEG proposals). It has now been replaced by Template:IEG/Committee/Review/Score/2 for all new rounds of IEG.
==Aggregated feedback from the committee for ''(project name)''==
{{IEG/Committee/Review/Score
| A score=
| B score=
| C score=
| D score=
| E score=
| F score=
| G score=
| H score=
| I score=
| J score=
| K score=
| L score=
| comments=
}}
__TOC__
| Scoring criteria (see the rubric for background) | Score 1=weakest 5=strongest |
| Potential for impact | |
| (A) The project fits with the Wikimedia movement's strategic priorities | |
| (B) The project has the potential to lead to significant online impact. | |
| (C) The impact of the project can be sustained after the grant ends. | |
| (D) The project has potential to be scaled or adapted for other languages or projects. | |
| Ability to execute | |
| (E) The project has demonstrated interest from a community it aims to serve. | |
| (F) The project can be completed as scoped within 6 months with the requested funds. | |
| (G) The budget is reasonable and an efficient use of funds. | |
| (H) The individual(s) proposing the project have the required skills and experience needed to complete it. | |
| Fostering innovation and learning | |
| (I) The project has innovative potential to add new strategies and knowledge for solving important issues in the movement. | |
| (J) The risk involved in the project's size and approach is appropriately balanced with its potential gain in terms of impact. | |
| (K) The proposed measures of success are useful for evaluating whether or not the project was successful. | |
| (L) The project supports or grows the diversity of the Wikimedia movement. | |
| Comments from the committee:
This area will be comments from the committee. | |