Talk:Wiki Research Ideas/Design
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Alexander Doria
transferred from User talk:Alexander Doria/First Proposal for a Wiki Journal
This is so beautiful it makes my teeth hurt. I look forward to getting Issue #0 out the door. But perhaps "The Authors" could break down into a few layers of authorship, from writing to commentary. (Perhaps the reviewers can get more visibility as well - not only as gatekeepers but as contributors of high-level commentary and annotation that shows up in the published document.) –SJ talk 23:47, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for your nice comments.
- I have added some credits to other authors. Besides, I have displaced this page here : Wiki Research Ideas/Design (and transferred your comments on the discussion page by the way…).
- Alexander Doria (talk) 12:26, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
- Nice, thanks. Now we need to brainstorm contributors to the first issue... an impressive lineup will attract future contributors. (as with the journal of tweet-length papers :) –SJ talk
- Looks nice. The Fraktur (how do you call it? Old English?) letters don't really fit. But in general it makes a good impression. I suggest a title and a subtitle, e.g.: "Knowledge now. The Journal on Wikis and Free Knowledge". Ziko (talk) 19:29, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
- Fine suggestion. I have finally chosen a more usual font. Alexander Doria (talk) 12:06, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
- Looks nice. The Fraktur (how do you call it? Old English?) letters don't really fit. But in general it makes a good impression. I suggest a title and a subtitle, e.g.: "Knowledge now. The Journal on Wikis and Free Knowledge". Ziko (talk) 19:29, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
- Nice, thanks. Now we need to brainstorm contributors to the first issue... an impressive lineup will attract future contributors. (as with the journal of tweet-length papers :) –SJ talk