This page is for discussions related to Universal Code of Conduct/Enforcement draft guidelines review/ko.

Please remember to:

Sign posts using the four tildes (~~~~)
Remain civil and polite during discussions.
Place new comments below in existing sections or start a new section.

Discussion navigation:

For general discussion about the UCoC project: Talk:Universal Code of Conduct/Project
For enquiries about the UCoC Coordinating Committee: Talk:Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee
For discussions about UCoC training: Talk:Universal Code of Conduct/Training
For enquiries about the UCoC policy: foundationwiki:Policy talk:Universal Code of Conduct
For enquiries about the UCoC Enforcement Guidelines policy: foundation:Policy talk:Universal Code of Conduct/Enforcement guidelines
For a list of all historical discussions: Universal Code of Conduct/Discussions

한국어 토론은 한국어 위키백과에서 주로 진행되고 있습니다만, 한국어 위키백과에 방문하기 어려울 경우 여기에 의견을 남겨주셔도 됩니다.--YKo (WMF) (talk) 12:41, 17 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Universal Code of Conduct/Enforcement draft guidelines review

A Note from the Drafting Committee: Please keep in mind that the UCoC Enforcement Guidelines outlined in this document are iterative, and will continuously be evaluated and evolve with community feedback, along with the Universal Code of Conduct. The committee has also provided questions for the community to think about in regards to this draft.

'Overview'

'Preventive work (articles 1 and 2 UCOC)'

'Responsive work (article 3 UCOC)'

'Principles for processing and filing of reported cases'

'Providing resources for processing cases'

'Types of violations and enforcement mechanism / groups'

'Recommendations for the reporting and processing tool'

'Recommendations for local enforcement structures'

'Recommendations for how to process appeals'

Open questions for the Community

Escalation: Where do the complaints go, what instance/body/judge is supposed to process them.

Regulations for appeal (after the previous question "Where do the complaints go" has been answered).

Should the U4C committee also decide individual cases or process appeals?

When should someone be able to initiate an appeal for a UCoC violation?

What kinds of behavior or evidence would we want to see before granting an appeal?

Who should handle the appeals process?

How often should someone be allowed to appeal a UCoC violation decision?

To what extent should individual Wikimedia projects be allowed to decide how they enforce the UCoC?

How will people be chosen for the U4C committee?

Our current recommended list of users include, but are not limited to: CheckUsers, oversighters, bureaucrats, administrators of local projects, arbitration committee members, Wikimedia Foundation employees, Affiliates, etc.

Should an interim committee be formed while the "U4C" committee is being created?

Should global conduct committees, such as the Technical Code of Conduct committee, be merged into the proposed U4C?

General comments

번역을 돕고 싶으세요? 아직 번역되지 않은 메시지를 번역해 보세요.