Jump to content

Talk:Stewards/Confirm/2015/Shizhao

Add topic
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Stho002

This vote was closed without warning (presumably when the running result suited those who want it closed). My comments were reverted, which is o.t.t. Even if my comments were too late to influence the result of the vote, there is no reason to add reverts to my account stats. My comments should just be left on the page (or, at worst, edited out). This once again proves just how much of a stinking cesspit of cronyism and mob rule wiki has become. And, yes, I WAS canvassed to come here and vote against Shizhao. I couldn't give a shit otherwise, but I owed someone a favour. Stho002 (talk) 00:01, 4 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

The vote was closed when Stewards/Confirm/2015 said it was going to close, a date and time which had been set for months. And unlike SE (which is a vote), the confirmations are a "!vote". PiRSquared17 (talk) 00:05, 4 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
This SHOULD HAVE BEEN a vote for Shizhao to be desysoped. As such, it should be independent of steward elections. I have been desysoped and indefinitely blocked on enWP and WS for FAR LESS "misdemeanors" than Shizhao is guilty of. Why is it so easy to remove me, but not Shizhao. For example, he put a global lock on my account, with no reasons given, even when reasons were requested by other stewards, who agreed that the lock was clearly unwarranted. You are all just a bunch of corrupt fuckwits Stho002 (talk) 00:11, 4 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
The outcome of the confirmations is still being decided, and will be released within the next few days. --Rschen7754 03:25, 4 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
So, whether or not he can stay and continue to abuse his powers turns on how many friends he has got, how many he can canvass, and how many undetected socks he has in "sleep mode". I have SUCH confidence in the outcome ... Stho002 (talk) 03:38, 4 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Late Voices Still Deserved Being Heard

[edit]
  • Remove Remove Way too controversial in zh wiki. Matthew hk (talk) 22:11, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Clearly a loose cannon who brings wiki into disrepute Stho002 (talk) 21:07, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

— The preceding unsigned comment was added by URYTOMMY (talk) 01:23 UTC, 4 March 2015 (UTC)