Talk:Requests for comment/Closure of old RFCs
Add topicLatest comment: 8 years ago by MarcoAurelio in topic Timeout
Timeout
[edit]{{edit request}} Please close this RfC as "make it so (unanimous)". After that folks are entitled to close long dead RfCs as "stalled" or "no consensus" as specified in this RfC. –Be..anyone 💩 04:17, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- "Unanimous" is not entirely true, there is a tiny exception ;-) I would like to know what exactly speaks against what I have written there and makes this RfC necessary. --Vogone (talk) 14:06, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- Nobody without Admin rights is entitled to clean-up this zoo at the moment, and a more relaxed "everything goes" procedure as on, say, commons, where I closed some RfCs, might be unsuited here. –Be..anyone 💩 05:19, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
- Non-admins are generally more than welcome to close RfCs. The reason is more important than the person IMO. Ajraddatz (talk) 06:11, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
- Nobody without Admin rights is entitled to clean-up this zoo at the moment, and a more relaxed "everything goes" procedure as on, say, commons, where I closed some RfCs, might be unsuited here. –Be..anyone 💩 05:19, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Update: "make it so (almost unanimous rough consensus)". –Be..anyone 💩 05:21, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
- Closed. —MarcoAurelio 17:40, 17 April 2016 (UTC)