Talk:Requests for comment/Account creation logs

RfC format

Meta RfCs aren't used for surveys. Please reformat this into a section giving some background context, a section explaining a specific policy proposal or topic for discussion, and then a section for discussion. – Ajraddatz (talk) 03:34, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

• @Ajraddatz: I intend this to be an RfC, not a survey. I provide a link to background information at the top of the page, and discussion sections are included under each question. --Pine^✉

  Thanks; that makes things a bit more clear. I've added section headings for easier navigation. – Ajraddatz (talk) 05:23, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

• @Ajraddatz: the section headings look good to me. Thanks. --Pine^✉ 05:25, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

• Excellent, glad they're ok. If you have some time, my final suggestion is that you flesh out the background section a bit more. Give more summary of the discussion and the perspectives given. I imagine there are other (lazy) people like me who don't want to read through a mail list archive :-) – Ajraddatz (talk) 05:30, 31 January 2018 (UTC)