Talk:EU policy/Consultation on a European Strategy for data

User:Abián's two cents

Section 1: General questions on the data strategy

Do you agree that the European Union needs an overarching data strategy to enable the digital transformation of the society?

• Yes ←
• No

“More data should be available for the common good, for example for improving mobility, delivering personalised medicine, reducing energy consumption and making our society greener.” To what extent do you agree with this statement?

• Strongly agree ← This is the answer best aligned with a movement for free knowledge…
• Somewhat agree
• Neutral
• Somewhat disagree
• Strongly disagree
• I don’t know / no opinion

… but let's notice the mention of "the common good", which is as critical as it is ambiguous. I think we don't want, or wouldn't benefit from, the disclosure of data that can threaten our privacy or our individual or collective security. In particular:

• Data already protected by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), in case we agree with it.
• Data that can be used to cause significant harm: data on unresolved software/hardware vulnerabilities, data on how to make weapons (soon, ordinary people could be making firearms with 3D printers or even genetically modifying viruses or bacteria in their homes), etc.
• Poor quality data (incomplete, outdated, misleading data), whose use will lead to wrong decisions and actions. By saying that more data should be available we don't mean that we support the spread of misinformation.
• Data whose publication leaves European companies at such a significant competitive disadvantage that the existence of a successful business/industrial/commercial network in Europe becomes impossible, an effect that might not be considered "the common good". This is a delicate point because it may come into apparent conflict with our purpose as a global movement for free knowledge, so we should determine where the threshold is.

What is "the common good"? Who defines it? How?

Do you think that it should be made easier for individuals to give access to existing data held about them, e.g. by online platform providers, car manufacturers, producers of wearables, voice assistants or smart home appliances, to new services providers of their choosing, in line with the GDPR?

• Yes ← But I don't know what "it should be made easier" means. For example, I may not like a platform to integrate, collect or redirect my personal data from various providers to make it "easier" for me to access the data.
• No

‘General data literacy across the EU population is currently insufficient for everyone to benefit from data-driven innovation and to become more active agents in the data economy.’ To what extent do you agree with this statement?

• Strongly agree
• Somewhat agree ← Just my opinion, please tell me if you want me to elaborate.
• Neutral
• Somewhat disagree
• Strongly disagree
• I don’t know / no opinion

‘The EU should make major investments in technologies and infrastructures that enhance data access and use, while giving individuals as well as public and private organisations full control over the data they generate.’ To what extent do you agree with this statement?

• Strongly agree
• Somewhat agree ← The EU will have to invest, but investment is no guarantee of success, nor does more investment guarantee better results. In some cases the investment will not be the key; the willingness to reach agreements, to implement the right processes, to listen to Wikimedia :-) and to many other stakeholders… will be.
• Neutral
• Somewhat disagree
• Strongly disagree
• I don’t know / no opinion

‘The development of common European data spaces should be supported by the EU in strategic industry sectors and domains of public interest (industry/manufacturing, Green Deal, mobility, health, finance, energy, agriculture, public administration, skills).’ To what extent do you agree with this statement?

• Strongly agree
• Somewhat agree ← I would choose "Strongly agree", but I find the question a little ambiguous. Data spaces should be "supported"… in what way?
• Neutral
• Somewhat disagree
• Strongly disagree
• I don’t know / no opinion

Section 2.1 - Specific questions on future actions: Data governance

‘Data governance mechanisms are needed to capture the enormous potential of data in particular for cross-sector data use.' To what extent do you agree with this statement?

• Strongly agree ← Just my opinion.
• Somewhat agree
• Neutral
• Somewhat disagree
• Strongly disagree
• I don’t know / no opinion

Public authorities should do more to make available a broader range of sensitive data for R&I purposes for the public interest, in full respect of data protection rights.' To what extent do you agree with this statement?

• Strongly agree
• Somewhat agree ← Available to whom? What does "a broader range of sensitive data" mean? How can sensitive data be made available "in full respect of data protection rights"? Under what technical privacy rules? Differential privacy? k-anonymity? Or the original data but only available to a few authorized persons?
• Neutral
• Somewhat disagree
• Strongly disagree
• I don’t know / no opinion

Do you think that law and technology should enable citizens to make available their data for the public interest, without any direct reward?

• Yes
• No
• I don't know / no opinion ←

This opens up obvious possibilities, but also a number of problems. For instance:

• We have to make sure that people are aware of the practical consequences and risks of donating their data when they're offered to do so. Although "the consent to the processing of such data" can "be withdrawn", people should keep in mind that their data may never disappear completely, even in cases where the law requires otherwise.
• In the context of a study (demographic, academic, public health…), if the sample has not been designed following strict statistical criteria, but only according to the people who have decided to donate their data, the results can be biased, misleading and invalid. These datasets should be distinguishable from the rest and everyone who uses these datasets should be aware of this limitation.
• If donations are not supported by processes that ensure the data is reliable and up-to-date, the donations can be counterproductive because, again, their use can lead to wrong decisions and actions.
• Ethical dilemmas related to the value of personal data and to the social and institutional legitimization of these practices. Just to mention one, everyone's personal data (an asset that even the poorest people have) would lose value, including those who don't donate their data.

I don't think Wikimedia should take a categorical affirmative or negative position on this.

Do you think there are sufficient tools and mechanisms to “donate” your data?

• Yes
• No
• I don't know / no opinion ← I don't think Wikimedia should take a categorical affirmative or negative position on this.

‘Such intermediaries [data marketplaces/brokers] are useful enablers of the data economy.’ To what extent do you agree with this statement?

• Strongly agree
• Somewhat agree
• Neutral
• Somewhat disagree ← This question is controversial. Probably, as a free knowledge movement, we prefer data to be freely accessible than to be bought and sold almost clandestinely by some companies, but we can't say that buying and selling data is bad by definition, and other answers with proper justifications would seem equally valid to me. By the way, I wouldn't say that data marketplaces are "novel"…
• Strongly disagree
• I don’t know / no opinion

Section 2.2 - Specific questions on future actions: identification of high-value datasets

"The establishment of a list of high-value datasets, to be made available free of charge, without restrictions and via APIs, is a good way to ensure that public sector data has a positive impact on the EU's economy and society." To what extent do you agree with this statement?

• Strongly agree
• Somewhat agree ← Only if, once again, these datasets are kept up to date and, in general, their quality is guaranteed.
• Neutral
• Somewhat disagree
• Strongly disagree
• I don’t know / no opinion

Apart from the potential to generate socio-economic benefits, please indicate the relevance of the following additional factors to be taken into account when selecting datasets for the future list of high value datasets

For each please indicate: Very relevant; Relevant; Neutral; Not relevant; Not relevant at all; I don't know / no opinion

• The re-use of the dataset would increase if it was provided free of charge. Relevant / Very relevant
• The dataset belongs to a thematic area in which there are few EU-level requirements for opening up data. Neutral / Relevant
• The re-use of the dataset would increase if its availability under uniform conditions was ensured across the entire EU. Relevant / Very relevant
• The re-use of the dataset would increase if it was available via an application programming interface (API). Relevant / Very relevant
• If other factors: please specify

Please indicate the relevance of each of the other arrangements indicated below to improve the re-usability of specific high-value datasets.

For each please indicate: Very relevant; Relevant; Neutral; Not relevant; Not relevant at all; I don't know / no opinion

• Licensing and other terms applicable to re-use. Relevant / Very relevant
• Standardised formats of data and metadata. Very relevant
• Possibility of user feedback. Relevant / Very relevant
• Specific technical arrangements for dissemination. I don't know / no opinion, too ambiguous
• If other arrangements, please specify:

EU programmes may provide funding to enhance the availability and re-use of high-value datasets across Europe. For each of the following activities, please indicate how relevant it is to support them.

For each please indicate: Very relevant; Relevant; Neutral; Not relevant; Not relevant at all; I don't know / no opinion

• Improving the quality (e.g. machine-readability) and interoperability of the data/metadata. Relevant / Very relevant
• Ensuring sustainable data provision via application programming interfaces (APIs). Relevant / Very relevant
• Engaging with re-users (promoting the data, co-defining use-cases). Relevant / Very relevant
• If other activities, please specify:

According to your experience and the expected potential of concrete datasets, indicate up to three specific datasets that should be listed in each of the thematic categories of high-value datasets, as referred to in Article 13(1) of the Open Data Directive

• Geospatial:
• Earth observation and environment:
• Meteorological:
• Statistics:
• Companies and company ownership:
• Mobility:

Unfortunately, I have to save this question for when I have some more time. --abián 14:50, 4 May 2020 (UTC)