Jump to content

Talk:Association of Inclusionist Wikipedians/Arguments

Add topic
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Silly arguments from deletion page, moved to talk

[edit]
Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion
Translate please?
Only an inclusionist wouldn't understand it.
Because deletionists use their awkward language(s). Too bad.
  • The proliferation of mediocrity is never its own excuse, and the absence of good information does not obviate the need for that information. Geogre 16:55, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
What???
Only an inclusionist wouldn't understand it.
Because deletionists use their awkward language(s). Too bad.
  • Wikipedia is not Google JFWT@lk 20:00, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Wikipedia should replace Google.
...
And keep out all the bad results/articles.
There is no bad information - use "Inappropriate" instead. Move it then
  • Roses are red/violets are blue/in Soviet Wikipedia/bad article delete you. --Slowking Man
Translate please?
Only an inclusionist wouldn't understand.
Because deletionists use their awkward language(s). Too bad.
  • Wikipedia is not Chewing Tobacco, and Other Surreal Essays.
What are you talking about???
Inclusionists wouldn't know.
Yeah, because it's written in Moron language, a special language for deletionists.
Translate this alien language, please.
Everyone knows it except inclusionists.
Yeah, because it's written in Moron language, a special language for deletionists.
So what?

Inclusionist 03:17, 5 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Some general arguments

[edit]
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  • Do I care for article in particular, (even if) Not really much right now, I (or any other editor) may spend various hours of research time for improving articles that I don't care but others may care
  • Do I find the article useful, It may be useful for some other people interested in the area, I (or any other editor) also may care about the info in the future if I (they) get interested, moreover verifiable list articles useful in general, if the article doesn't hurt anyone or violate policy actually
  • Do deleting the article helps anyone on earth, (if and generally) Simply no.
  • Can the article will be improved in the future, (if and generally) Yes.
  • Can the article will be improved easier in the future if we not delete it, Certainly Yes.

I recently used these arguments in a deletion review. They may be helpful. Kasaalan 11:24, 17 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Association_of_Inclusionist_Wikipedians/Arguments&oldid=1520100"