| Line |
Summary |
Contributors |
Keywords
|
| Summary of discussion from 03-22 to 03-24
|
| Hostile Environment
|
| 1
|
Providing (simple) mechanisms for dispute resolutions |
GoEThe, Chico Venancio (WMF), Darwin |
Conflict resolution, civility
|
| 2
|
Immediate response to harassment and civility problems (League of Legends mechanism used as example) |
GoEThe, Kleiner |
Harassment, civility
|
| 3 |
Improve environment before reaching out to new editors |
Darwin |
New editor retention, civility
|
| Moderation of discussions
|
| 4 |
Moderation mechanisms in discussions. A way to prioritize good and helpful comments and de-emphasize bad and unhelpful ones. (Quora and Stack Overflow mentioned) |
GoEThe |
moderation, discussions, organized debate
|
| Prioritizing and improving content
|
| 5 |
Priority lists of articles by themes ("500 most important in Geography") |
HTPF |
Priority lists, content
|
| 6 |
Worry about content gaps about local content within the Portuguese Language community |
HTPF, Darwin |
Content gaps, local content, Knowledge gaps
|
| 7 |
Featured articles as barriers to newcomers, should not be priority |
Darwin |
Featured articles, newcomers, priorities
|
| 8 |
Translations as non ideal expenditure of time, translated content is normally non-local content, should not be priority. |
HTPF, GoEThe |
Translations, local content, Knowledge gaps
|
| Summary of discussion from 03-24 to 04-18
|
| Hostile Environment
|
| 9 |
We should foment more initiatives to reward editors for contributions and constructive behaviors |
TheGustavoNerd, Ultragp7 |
Gamefication, editor involvement
|
| Content Priorities and Improvements
|
| 10 |
Themes from Africa are missing in Wikipedia, the movement should incentivize writing of content and outreach of theses themes |
wu22222, O Sem Autoridade, Ultragp7 |
Content diversity, knowledge gaps, Africa
|
| 11 |
Important criteria to prioritize content: 1) universal timeless themes 2) current events and news |
Igor G.Monteiro |
Content priorities, timeless themes, current events
|
| Openness to IPs, Academic Revision of Content
|
| 12 |
There should be a formal revision process for Wikipedia articles |
pt:user:GualdimG pt:user:Tetraktys, Ultragp7(partially) |
content revision, quality
|
| 13 |
IPs (unregistered users) shound be restricted in their edits to Wikipedia |
pt:Usuário:Tetraktys |
unregistered users
|
| 14 |
All articles, specially those from IPs should have their edits verified in Wikipedia |
pt:usuário:GualdimG |
quality, content revision, unregistered users
|
| 15 |
We should captivate college students to create articles |
pt:usuário:GualdimG |
Wikipedia Education programs, colleges
|
| 16 |
We should adopt mechanisms to review all content before publishing |
wu22222, Ultragp7 |
Content review, quality
|
| Knowledge about the community
|
| 17 |
We should know our users better, know their area of contributions, as well as the time dedicated to each area. |
Igor G.Monteiro, Ultragp7 |
Knowledge about the community, time dedicated to each editing area, meta-knowledge
|
| 18 |
We should know focus area for editors and collective urgencies (long missing articles, articles in need of updating, incomplete articles) |
Igor G.Monteiro, Ultragp7 |
focus areas, meta-knowledge
|
| Other
|
| 19 |
The reader should feel well, acomplished, and updated by visitting our projects, as well as have an easy navigation. |
Igor G.Monteiro, Ultragp7 |
Reader, design, content
|
| 20 |
Editors should have the most of their time spent as useful to the projects; we should have better ways of identifying content that has a higher likelihood of staying. |
Igor G.Monteiro, Ultragp7 |
maximize usefulness, rollback, likelihood of staying
|
| 21 |
We should make Wikimedia projects more accessible to humans; articles withe better, more precise and objective writting, as well as working in en:accessibility and en:usability. |
Oxe, Ultragp7 |
accessibility, content, objectivity
|
| 22 |
We should make Wikimedia projects more accessible to machines; content should be more easily processed by computers so the acumulated knowledge of Wikipedia be available to more diverse computational uses, the already known and those yet to be invented. |
Oxe, Ultragp7 |
machine readable, machine learning, innovations
|
| 23 |
We should have more media types, imagine how interesting it would be the production of an encyclopedic video in a wiki way. |
Oxe, Ultragp7 |
Media types, video production
|
| 24 |
We should rething interactivity with reader, todays discussion about Wikipedia articles is very limited, but we have an oportunity for greater interaction and content development; we should have an Q&A system in relation to the subject of the articles. |
Oxe, Ultragp7, Darwin |
Q&A space, discussion about content, interactivity
|
